Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem with Permutation-Aware Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.02939 v1 pith:PSCJYCYL submitted 2023-05-04 quant-ph cs.ET

Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem with Permutation-Aware Synthesis

classification quant-ph cs.ET
keywords mappingcircuitblockblocksgatesqubitapproachaverage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose a novel hierarchical qubit mapping and routing algorithm. First, a circuit is decomposed into blocks that span an identical number of qubits. In the second stage permutation-aware synthesis (PAS), each block is optimized and synthesized in isolation. In the third stage a permutation-aware mapping (PAM) algorithm maps the blocks to the target device based on the information from the second stage. Our approach is based on the following insights: (1) partitioning the circuit into blocks is beneficial for qubit mapping and routing; (2) with PAS, any block can implement an arbitrary input-output qubit mapping that reduces the gate count; and (3) with PAM, for two adjacent blocks we can select input-output permutations that optimize each block together with the amount of communication required at the block boundary. Whereas existing mapping algorithms preserve the original circuit structure and only introduce "minimal" communication via inserting SWAP or bridge gates, the PAS+PAM approach can additionally change the circuit structure and take full advantage of hardware-connectivity. Our experiments show that we can produce better-quality circuits than existing mapping algorithms or commercial compilers (Qiskit, TKET, BQSKit) with maximum optimization settings. For a combination of benchmarks we produce circuits shorter by up to 68% (18% on average) fewer gates than Qiskit, up to 36% (9% on average) fewer gates than TKET, and up to 67% (21% on average) fewer gates than BQSKit. Furthermore, the approach scales, and it can be seamlessly integrated into any quantum circuit compiler or optimization infrastructure.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.