Pith

open record

sign in

arxiv: 2305.12056 · v2 · pith:SRU6RG4W · submitted 2023-05-20 · stat.ML · cs.LG· math.OC

Uniform-in-Time Wasserstein Stability Bounds for (Noisy) Stochastic Gradient Descent

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SRU6RG4Wrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification stat.ML cs.LGmath.OC
keywords boundsstabilityalgorithmsdifferentlossesconvexnoisenon-convex
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Algorithmic stability is an important notion that has proven powerful for deriving generalization bounds for practical algorithms. The last decade has witnessed an increasing number of stability bounds for different algorithms applied on different classes of loss functions. While these bounds have illuminated various properties of optimization algorithms, the analysis of each case typically required a different proof technique with significantly different mathematical tools. In this study, we make a novel connection between learning theory and applied probability and introduce a unified guideline for proving Wasserstein stability bounds for stochastic optimization algorithms. We illustrate our approach on stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and we obtain time-uniform stability bounds (i.e., the bound does not increase with the number of iterations) for strongly convex losses and non-convex losses with additive noise, where we recover similar results to the prior art or extend them to more general cases by using a single proof technique. Our approach is flexible and can be generalizable to other popular optimizers, as it mainly requires developing Lyapunov functions, which are often readily available in the literature. It also illustrates that ergodicity is an important component for obtaining time-uniform bounds -- which might not be achieved for convex or non-convex losses unless additional noise is injected to the iterates. Finally, we slightly stretch our analysis technique and prove time-uniform bounds for SGD under convex and non-convex losses (without additional additive noise), which, to our knowledge, is novel.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.