Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Financial misstatement detection: a realistic evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.17457 v1 pith:6FFAQOSP submitted 2023-05-27 cs.CL cs.LGq-fin.CP

classification cs.CLcs.LGq-fin.CP
keywords evaluationmisstatementfinancialrealistictaskconsidersdetectionframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work, we examine the evaluation process for the task of detecting financial reports with a high risk of containing a misstatement. This task is often referred to, in the literature, as ``misstatement detection in financial reports''. We provide an extensive review of the related literature. We propose a new, realistic evaluation framework for the task which, unlike a large part of the previous work: (a) focuses on the misstatement class and its rarity, (b) considers the dimension of time when splitting data into training and test and (c) considers the fact that misstatements can take a long time to detect. Most importantly, we show that the evaluation process significantly affects system performance, and we analyze the performance of different models and feature types in the new realistic framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools