Structural Similarities Between Language Models and Neural Response Measurements
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:DBJWXLARrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have complicated internal dynamics, but induce representations of words and phrases whose geometry we can study. Human language processing is also opaque, but neural response measurements can provide (noisy) recordings of activation during listening or reading, from which we can extract similar representations of words and phrases. Here we study the extent to which the geometries induced by these representations, share similarities in the context of brain decoding. We find that the larger neural language models get, the more their representations are structurally similar to neural response measurements from brain imaging. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/coastalcph/brainlm}.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Value Benchmarks: Measuring Value-Structure Alignment in Large Language Models via Symmetric Q-Sorts
Introduces a Q-sort protocol using human reference factors to quantify LLM value-structure alignment via Procrustes similarity and RSA correlations, revealing cross-family heterogeneity and localized misalignments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.