Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Entanglement groups

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.06437 v3 pith:JXQX55XA submitted 2023-07-12 quant-ph

Entanglement groups

classification quant-ph
keywords entanglementgroupsactingconstructedlocalotherpartsrefer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We propose to define entanglement in terms of local unitary transformations acting on some parts of a system that can be undone by local unitary transformations acting on other parts. This leads to a characterization of entanglement in terms of groups. We refer to these as entanglement groups, and we refer to this notion as $g$-entanglement. We discuss the physical meaning of entanglement groups and contrast $g$-entanglement with other, more conventional definitions of entanglement. For pure states, entanglement groups are constructed as certain quotients of the stabilizer group and its subgroups. For mixed states, entanglement groups can be constructed from stabilizers of the purification. We analyze the structure of entanglement groups, show that they have properties which correspond to monogamy of entanglement, and explore the restrictions placed by separability. We show that $g$-entanglement underlies several well-known quantum tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.