Is visual explanation with Grad-CAM more reliable for deeper neural networks? a case study with automatic pneumothorax diagnosis
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SLKWVFWArecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
While deep learning techniques have provided the state-of-the-art performance in various clinical tasks, explainability regarding their decision-making process can greatly enhance the credence of these methods for safer and quicker clinical adoption. With high flexibility, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) has been widely adopted to offer intuitive visual interpretation of various deep learning models' reasoning processes in computer-assisted diagnosis. However, despite the popularity of the technique, there is still a lack of systematic study on Grad-CAM's performance on different deep learning architectures. In this study, we investigate its robustness and effectiveness across different popular deep learning models, with a focus on the impact of the networks' depths and architecture types, by using a case study of automatic pneumothorax diagnosis in X-ray scans. Our results show that deeper neural networks do not necessarily contribute to a strong improvement of pneumothorax diagnosis accuracy, and the effectiveness of GradCAM also varies among different network architectures.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.