Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Estimating the prevalance of indirect effects and other spillovers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.03969 v3 pith:CF7VUGPZ submitted 2023-09-07 stat.ME

Estimating the prevalance of indirect effects and other spillovers

classification stat.ME
keywords effectsindirectsettingstreatmentaffectedassumptionsestimationexperiment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In settings where interference between units is possible, we define the prevalence of indirect effects to be the number of units who are affected by the treatment of others. This quantity does not fully identify an indirect effect, but may be used to show whether such effects are widely prevalent. Given a randomized experiment with binary-valued outcomes, methods are presented for conservative point estimation and one-sided interval estimation. No assumptions beyond randomization of treatment are required, allowing for usage in settings where models or assumptions on interference might be questionable. To show asymptotic coverage of our intervals in settings not covered by existing results, we provide a central limit theorem that combines local dependence and sampling without replacement. Consistency and minimax properties of the point estimator are shown as well. The approach is demonstrated on an experiment in which students were treated for a highly transmissible parasitic infection, for which we find that a significant fraction of students were affected by the treatment of schools other than their own.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.