Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning: Examining Current Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09856 v1 pith:3SW7GDK2 submitted 2023-11-16 cs.LG cs.DCcs.GT

classification cs.LGcs.DCcs.GT
keywords approachesdatacontributioncurrentevaluationfairfederatedlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has seen increasing interest in cases where entities want to collaboratively train models while maintaining privacy and governance over their data. In FL, clients with private and potentially heterogeneous data and compute resources come together to train a common model without raw data ever leaving their locale. Instead, the participants contribute by sharing local model updates, which, naturally, differ in quality. Quantitatively evaluating the worth of these contributions is termed the Contribution Evaluation (CE) problem. We review current CE approaches from the underlying mathematical framework to efficiently calculate a fair value for each client. Furthermore, we benchmark some of the most promising state-of-the-art approaches, along with a new one we introduce, on MNIST and CIFAR-10, to showcase their differences. Designing a fair and efficient CE method, while a small part of the overall FL system design, is tantamount to the mainstream adoption of FL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools