Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Analysis Between SciTokens, Verifiable Credentials, and Smart Contracts: Novel Approaches for Authentication and Secure Access to Scientific Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13422 v1 pith:7ID5PGSH submitted 2023-08-28 cs.CR cs.CYcs.IR

classification cs.CRcs.CYcs.IR
keywords accessdatascientificanalysiscomparativeapproachesauthenticationcontracts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Managing and exchanging sensitive information securely is a paramount concern for the scientific and cybersecurity community. The increasing reliance on computing workflows and digital data transactions requires ensuring that sensitive information is protected from unauthorized access, tampering, or misuse. This research paper presents a comparative analysis of three novel approaches for authenticating and securing access to scientific data: SciTokens, Verifiable Credentials, and Smart Contracts. The aim of this study is to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of each approach from trust, revocation, privacy, and security perspectives. We examine the technical features and privacy and security mechanisms of each technology and provide a comparative synthesis with the proposed model. Through our analysis, we demonstrate that each technology offers unique advantages and limitations, and the integration of these technologies can lead to more secure and efficient solutions for authentication and access to scientific data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools