Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rethinking Randomized Smoothing from the Perspective of Scalability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.12608 v2 pith:LNPJVZUY submitted 2023-12-19 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords randomizedsmoothingadversarialattacksdefensesempiricalexistinglearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models have demonstrated remarkable success across diverse domains but remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Empirical defense mechanisms often fail, as new attacks constantly emerge, rendering existing defenses obsolete, shifting the focus to certification-based defenses. Randomized smoothing has emerged as a promising technique among notable advancements. This study reviews the theoretical foundations and empirical effectiveness of randomized smoothing and its derivatives in verifying machine learning classifiers from a perspective of scalability. We provide an in-depth exploration of the fundamental concepts underlying randomized smoothing, highlighting its theoretical guarantees in certifying robustness against adversarial perturbations and discuss the challenges of existing methodologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools