pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.12130 · v2 · pith:E432ANWZnew · submitted 2024-01-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Emergent Chaos-Like Dynamics of Spin-Orbit Torque-Driven Magnetic Transitions

Lisa-Marie Kern , Kai Litzius , Victor Deinhart , Michael Schneider , Christopher Klose , Kathinka Gerlinger , Riccardo Battistelli , Daniel Metternich
show 7 more authors
Dieter Engel Christian M. G\"unther Meng-Jie Huang Katja H\"oflich Felix B\"uttner Stefan Eisebitt Bastian Pfau
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 04:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-orbit torqueskyrmion dynamicsx-ray holographymagnetic phase transitiontopological instabilitypicosecond fluctuationstransient chaos
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-orbit torques drive skyrmions through a transient chaotic instability before reaching stable states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that spin-orbit torque control of magnetic skyrmions, normally viewed as deterministic, actually produces a short-lived regime of instability on picosecond timescales. Using time-resolved x-ray holography at a specially engineered defect site, the authors capture real-space evolution showing fluctuations, domain disorder, and skyrmion creation or loss before the system settles. This matters for nanoscale magnetic devices because it shows that reliable final outcomes can coexist with hidden transient complexity during actuation. The work identifies a dynamic phase transition separating ordered motion from this unstable window and demonstrates a method to observe such fast processes directly.

Core claim

SOT actuation in Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya materials produces a dynamic phase transition into a transient instability regime characterized by picosecond-scale fluctuations, strong domain disorder, topological instabilities, and skyrmion shedding, observed for the first time with pump-probe x-ray holography; the system then relaxes into reproducible final states.

What carries the argument

The dynamic phase transition separating coherent SOT-driven motion from transient instability, isolated by high-resolution pump-probe x-ray holography at an anisotropy-engineered defect.

Load-bearing premise

The high-resolution imaging at the engineered defect site captures the true intrinsic SOT dynamics without dominant contributions from measurement artifacts or sample variations.

What would settle it

High-resolution time-resolved images under identical conditions that show only smooth coherent motion with no picosecond fluctuations or skyrmion shedding would falsify the transient instability claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.12130 by Bastian Pfau, Christian M. G\"unther, Christopher Klose, Daniel Metternich, Dieter Engel, Felix B\"uttner, Kai Litzius, Kathinka Gerlinger, Katja H\"oflich, Lisa-Marie Kern, Meng-Jie Huang, Michael Schneider, Riccardo Battistelli, Stefan Eisebitt, Victor Deinhart.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observing SOT-driven magnetisation dynamics in simulation and experiment. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Systematic modelling of magnetisation dynamics. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time-resolved imaging of magnetisation dynamics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transiently chaotic SOT dynamics. a Time-resolved imaging results at µ0Hz = 78 mT. The dynamics is restricted to the dot, and the averaged magnetisation contrast reduces towards the end of the pulse. b Two simulation runs with identical initial state but slightly different current density with difference ∆jx/jx = 0.4%. c–e Analysis of the dynamic textures in the two simulation runs relative to the initial … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin-orbit torques (SOTs) are widely used to control magnetization in nanoscale electric systems and are typically assumed to drive skyrmion nucleation and motion in a deterministic manner, especially in materials with strong Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Here, using time-resolved holography-based x-ray microscopy supported by micromagnetic simulations, we reveal that on nano- to picosecond timescales the actual dynamics can deviate strikingly from this expectation by producing transient regimes of chaos-like behavior. By exploiting deterministic skyrmion generation at an anisotropy-engineered defect and implementing a high-resolution pump-probe scheme, we directly track the magnetization evolution in real space. This approach uncovers a dynamic phase transition that separates coherent SOT-driven motion from a regime of transient instability characterized by picosecond-scale fluctuations, strong domain disorder, topological instabilities, and skyrmion shedding, experimentally observed here for the first time. During SOT actuation, the system briefly enters this instability regime, showing short-lived chaos-like behavior, yet it reliably relaxes into robust and reproducible final states. Our results demonstrate a powerful methodology for accessing time-averaged nano- to picosecond dynamics in magnetic systems and reveal a previously hidden layer of transient, topologically rich behavior underlying nominally deterministic skyrmion control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved x-ray holography observations of SOT-driven magnetization dynamics in a system with an anisotropy-engineered defect for deterministic skyrmion nucleation. It claims to identify a dynamic phase transition separating coherent SOT motion from a transient instability regime featuring picosecond-scale fluctuations, strong domain disorder, topological instabilities, and skyrmion shedding; this regime is said to be experimentally observed for the first time. The system is reported to relax reliably into reproducible final states despite the transient behavior, with supporting micromagnetic simulations.

Significance. If the transient instability is shown to be intrinsic rather than an averaging artifact, the work would establish a new layer of complex, topologically rich dynamics underlying nominally deterministic SOT control on ultrafast timescales. The high-resolution pump-probe methodology could enable broader studies of time-resolved magnetic phenomena in spintronic systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the observed picosecond fluctuations, domain disorder, and skyrmion shedding represent an intrinsic dynamic phase transition (rather than pump-probe averaging artifacts) is load-bearing but rests on the untested premise that the high-resolution scheme plus anisotropy defect fully suppresses cycle-to-cycle jitter; no quantitative controls, number of averaged cycles, or error analysis on reconstructed images are provided to address this.
minor comments (1)
  1. The phrase 'chaos-like behavior' is used without a precise operational definition or quantitative metric (e.g., correlation decay or sensitivity to initial conditions); a brief clarification would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting this important point regarding the distinction between intrinsic dynamics and potential experimental artifacts. We address the concern as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the observed picosecond fluctuations, domain disorder, and skyrmion shedding represent an intrinsic dynamic phase transition (rather than pump-probe averaging artifacts) is load-bearing but rests on the untested premise that the high-resolution scheme plus anisotropy defect fully suppresses cycle-to-cycle jitter; no quantitative controls, number of averaged cycles, or error analysis on reconstructed images are provided to address this.

    Authors: The high-resolution pump-probe scheme combined with the anisotropy-engineered defect is intended to ensure deterministic behavior, and the manuscript shows that the system relaxes to reproducible final states. However, we acknowledge that explicit quantitative details on averaging and error analysis would better support the claim against averaging artifacts. In the revised version, we will add this information, including the number of cycles averaged per time point and error bars or standard deviations in the image reconstructions, to demonstrate that the fluctuations are above the experimental noise floor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in observational study

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of magnetic dynamics via pump-probe x-ray holography supported by micromagnetic simulations. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps exist in the provided text. Claims rest on direct measurement and independent simulation comparison rather than any self-referential reduction. This matches the default expectation for non-circular experimental work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is experimental; the abstract introduces no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new postulated entities. The claim rests on the validity of the x-ray microscopy technique and standard micromagnetic modeling assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5825 in / 1094 out tokens · 25193 ms · 2026-05-24T04:31:29.942838+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hellman, A

    F. Hellman, A. Hoffmann, Y. Tserkovnyak, G. S. Beach, E. E. Fullerton, C. Leighton, A. H. MacDonald, D. C. Ralph, D. A. Arena, H. A. D¨ urr,et al., Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 025006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, et al. , Roadmap of spin–orbit torques, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 57, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 1213 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Baumgartner, K

    M. Baumgartner, K. Garello, J. Mendil, C. O. Avci, E. Grimaldi, C. Murer, J. Feng, M. Gabureac, C. Stamm, Y. Acremann, et al. , Spatially and time-resolved magne- tization dynamics driven by spin–orbit torques, Nature Nanotechnology 12, 980 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Krizakova, M

    V. Krizakova, M. Perumkunnil, S. Couet, P. Gam- bardella, and K. Garello, Spin-orbit torque switching of magnetic tunnel junctions for memory applications, Jour- nal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 562, 169692 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Caretta, M

    L. Caretta, M. Mann, F. B¨ uttner, K. Ueda, B. Pfau, C. M. G¨ unther, P. Hessing, A. Churikova, C. Klose, M. Schneider, et al. , Fast current-driven domain walls and small skyrmions in a compensated ferrimagnet, Na- ture Nanotechnology 13, 1154 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    C. O. Avci, E. Rosenberg, L. Caretta, F. B¨ uttner, M. Mann, C. Marcus, D. Bono, C. A. Ross, and G. S. Beach, Interface-driven chiral magnetism and current- driven domain walls in insulating magnetic garnets, Na- ture Nanotechnology 14, 561 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Fulara, M

    H. Fulara, M. Zahedinejad, R. Khymyn, A. Awad, S. Muralidhar, M. Dvornik, and J. ˚Akerman, Spin-orbit torque–driven propagating spin waves, Science Advances 7 5, eaax8467 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Demidov, S

    V. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, A. Anane, V. Cros, and S. Demokritov, Spin–orbit-torque magnonics, Journal of Applied Physics 127, 170901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    S. Woo, K. Litzius, B. Kr¨ uger, M.-Y. Im, L. Caretta, K. Richter, M. Mann, A. Krone, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand, et al. , Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets, Nature Materials 15, 501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    B¨ uttner, I

    F. B¨ uttner, I. Lemesh, M. Schneider, B. Pfau, C. M. G¨ unther, P. Hessing, J. Geilhufe, L. Caretta, D. Engel, B. Kr¨ uger,et al. , Field-free deterministic ultrafast cre- ation of magnetic skyrmions by spin–orbit torques, Na- ture Nanotechnology 12, 1040 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Legrand, D

    W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, N. Reyren, K. Garcia, C. Moutafis, C. Moreau-Luchaire, S. Collin, K. Bouze- houane, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Room-temperature current-induced generation and motion of sub-100 nm skyrmions, Nano Letters 17, 2703 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    S.-H. Yang, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and S. S. P. Parkin, Chiral spintronics, Nature Reviews Physics3, 328 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nature nanotechnology 8, 152 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Litzius, I

    K. Litzius, I. Lemesh, B. Kr¨ uger, P. Bassirian, L. Caretta, K. Richter, F. B¨ uttner, K. Sato, O. A. Tretiakov, J. F¨ orster,et al. , Skyrmion hall effect revealed by di- rect time-resolved x-ray microscopy, Nature Physics 13, 170 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Litzius, J

    K. Litzius, J. Leliaert, P. Bassirian, D. Rodrigues, S. Kromin, I. Lemesh, J. Zazvorka, K.-J. Lee, J. Mulk- ers, N. Kerber, et al. , The role of temperature and drive current in skyrmion dynamics, Nature Electronics 3, 30 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    S. Woo, K. M. Song, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Y. Zhou, X. Liu, M. Weigand, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, M.-C. Park, et al., Deterministic creation and deletion of a single mag- netic skyrmion observed by direct time-resolved x-ray mi- croscopy, Nature Electronics 1, 288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    L.-M. Kern, B. Pfau, V. Deinhart, M. Schneider, C. Klose, K. Gerlinger, S. Wittrock, D. Engel, I. Will, C. M. G¨ unther, R. Liefferink, J. H. Mentink, S. Wintz, M. Weigand, M.-J. Huang, R. Battistelli, D. Metter- nich, F. B¨ uttner, K. H¨ oflich, and S. Eisebitt, Determinis- tic generation and guided motion of magnetic skyrmions by focused He +-ion irradi...

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Everschor-Sitte, M

    K. Everschor-Sitte, M. Sitte, T. Valet, A. Abanov, and J. Sinova, Skyrmion production on demand by homoge- neous dc currents, New Journal of Physics 19, 092001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Moreau-Luchaire, C

    C. Moreau-Luchaire, C. Moutafis, N. Reyren, J. Sam- paio, C. Vaz, N. Van Horne, K. Bouzehouane, K. Gar- cia, C. Deranlot, P. Warnicke, et al. , Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature, Nature Nan- otechnology 11, 444 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials 2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    B¨ uttner, C

    F. B¨ uttner, C. Moutafis, M. Schneider, B. Kr¨ uger, C. G¨ unther, J. Geilhufe, C. v. K. Schmising, J. Mo- hanty, B. Pfau, S. Schaffert, et al. , Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures, Nature Physics 11, 225 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Jiang, P

    W. Jiang, P. Upadhyaya, W. Zhang, G. Yu, M. B. Jungfleisch, F. Y. Fradin, J. E. Pearson, Y. Tserkovnyak, K. L. Wang, O. Heinonen, et al. , Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles, Science 349, 283 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Finizio, K

    S. Finizio, K. Zeissler, S. Wintz, S. Mayr, T. Weßels, A. J. Huxtable, G. Burnell, C. H. Marrows, and J. Raabe, De- terministic field-free skyrmion nucleation at a nanoengi- neered injector device, Nano Letters 19, 7246 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    S. Woo, K. M. Song, H.-S. Han, M.-S. Jung, M.-Y. Im, K.-S. Lee, K. S. Song, P. Fischer, J.-I. Hong, J. W. Choi, et al. , Spin-orbit torque-driven skyrmion dynamics re- vealed by time-resolved x-ray microscopy, Nature Com- munications 8, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Gerlinger, B

    K. Gerlinger, B. Pfau, F. B¨ uttner, M. Schneider, L.-M. Kern, J. Fuchs, D. Engel, C. M. G¨ unther, M. Huang, I. Lemesh, et al., Application concepts for ultrafast laser- induced skyrmion creation and annihilation, Applied Physics Letters 118, 192403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Lemesh, K

    I. Lemesh, K. Litzius, M. B¨ ottcher, P. Bassirian, N. Ker- ber, D. Heinze, J. Z´ azvorka, F. B¨ uttner, L. Caretta, M. Mann, et al. , Current-induced skyrmion generation through morphological thermal transitions in chiral fer- romagnetic heterostructures, Advanced Materials 30, 1805461 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    J. Yun, Y. Zuo, J. Mao, M. Chang, S. Zhang, J. Liu, and L. Xi, Lowering critical current density for spin-orbit torque induced magnetization switching by ion irradia- tion, Applied Physics Letters 115, 032404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Dunne, C

    P. Dunne, C. Fowley, G. Hlawacek, J. Kurian, G. Atch- eson, S. Colis, N. Teichert, B. Kundys, M. Venkatesan, J. Lindner, et al., Helium ion microscopy for reduced spin orbit torque switching currents, Nano Letters 20, 7036 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Battistelli, D

    R. Battistelli, D. Metternich, M. Schneider, L.-M. Kern, K. Litzius, J. Fuchs, C. Klose, K. Gerlinger, K. Bagschik, C. G¨ unther, W. Engel, C. Ropers, S. Eisebitt, B. Pfau, F. B¨ uttner, and S. Zayko, Coherent x-ray magnetic imag- ing with 5 nm resolution, Optica (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    R. Juge, K. Bairagi, K. G. Rana, J. Vogel, M. Sall, D. Mailly, V. T. Pham, Q. Zhang, N. Sisodia, M. Fo- erster, et al., Helium ions put magnetic skyrmions on the track, Nano Letters 21, 2989 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Masell, D

    J. Masell, D. R. Rodrigues, B. F. McKeever, and K. Everschor-Sitte, Spin-transfer torque driven motion, deformation, and instabilities of magnetic skyrmions at high currents, Physical Review B 101, 214428 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    S. M. Mohseni, S. Sani, J. Persson, T. A. Nguyen, S. Chung, Y. Pogoryelov, P. Muduli, E. Iacocca, A. Ek- lund, R. Dumas, et al. , Spin torque–generated magnetic droplet solitons, Science 339, 1295 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Bonetti, R

    S. Bonetti, R. Kukreja, Z. Chen, F. Maci` a, J. M. Hern` andez, A. Eklund, D. Backes, J. Frisch, J. Katine, G. Malm, S. Urazhdin, A. D. Kent, J. St¨ ohr, H. Ohldag, and H. A. D¨ urr, Direct observation and imaging of a spin- wave soliton with p-like symmetry, Nature Communica- tions 6, 8889 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    T´ el and Y.-C

    T. T´ el and Y.-C. Lai, Chaotic transients in spatially ex- tended systems, Physics Reports 460, 245 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    E. A. Montoya, S. Perna, Y.-J. Chen, J. A. Katine, M. d’Aquino, C. Serpico, and I. N. Krivorotov, Magne- tization reversal driven by low dimensional chaos in a nanoscale ferromagnet, Nature Communications 10, 543 (2019). 8

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    L. Shen, J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, X. Liu, G. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, Current-induced dynamics and chaos of antiferromagnetic bimerons, Physical Re- view Letters 124, 037202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    L. Liu, W. Chen, and Y. Zheng, Emergent mechanics of magnetic skyrmions deformed by defects, Physical Re- view Letters 131, 246701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Woo and G

    S. Woo and G. S. Beach, Control of propagating spin- wave attenuation by the spin-hall effect, Journal of Ap- plied Physics 122, 093901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    A. V. Chumak, P. Kabos, M. Wu, C. Abert, C. Adel- mann, A. Adeyeye, J. ˚Akerman, F. G. Aliev, A. Anane, A. Awad, et al., Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin- wave computing, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 58, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Williame, A

    J. Williame, A. Difini Accioly, D. Rontani, M. Scia- manna, and J.-V. Kim, Chaotic dynamics in a macrospin spin-torque nano-oscillator with delayed feedback, Ap- plied Physics Letters 114, 232405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    W. L. Ditto, K. Murali, and S. Sinha, Chaos computing: ideas and implementations, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engi- neering Sciences 366, 653 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    M. W. Daniels, A. Madhavan, P. Talatchian, A. Mizrahi, and M. D. Stiles, Energy-efficient stochastic computing with superparamagnetic tunnel junctions, Physical Re- view Applied 13, 034016 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Talatchian, M

    P. Talatchian, M. W. Daniels, A. Madhavan, M. R. Pu- fall, E. Ju´ e, W. H. Rippard, J. J. McClelland, and M. D. Stiles, Mutual control of stochastic switching for two electrically coupled superparamagnetic tunnel junctions, Physical Review B 104, 054427 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Eisebitt, J

    S. Eisebitt, J. L¨ uning, W. Schlotter, M. L¨ orgen, O. Hell- wig, W. Eberhardt, and J. St¨ ohr, Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by x-ray spectro-holography, Nature 432, 885 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Deinhart, L.-M

    V. Deinhart, L.-M. Kern, J. N. Kirchhof, S. Juer- gensen, J. Sturm, E. Krauss, T. Feichtner, S. Kovalchuk, M. Schneider, D. Engel, et al. , The patterning toolbox fib-o-mat: Exploiting the full potential of focused helium ions for nanofabrication, Beilstein Journal of Nanotech- nology 12, 304 (2021). 9 IFFT hologram sample b x rays synchronisation t repet...

    work page 2021