Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.01158 v1 pith:GLJM54YC submitted 2024-02-02 cs.CL

LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning

classification cs.CL
keywords detectiontextllmsai-generatedinstructionllm-detectormethodsentence-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT and other general large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success, but they have also raised concerns about the misuse of AI-generated texts. Existing AI-generated text detection models, such as based on BERT and RoBERTa, are prone to in-domain over-fitting, leading to poor out-of-domain (OOD) detection performance. In this paper, we first collected Chinese text responses generated by human experts and 9 types of LLMs, for which to multiple domains questions, and further created a dataset that mixed human-written sentences and sentences polished by LLMs. We then proposed LLM-Detector, a novel method for both document-level and sentence-level text detection through Instruction Tuning of LLMs. Our method leverages the wealth of knowledge LLMs acquire during pre-training, enabling them to detect the text they generate. Instruction tuning aligns the model's responses with the user's expected text detection tasks. Experimental results show that previous methods struggle with sentence-level AI-generated text detection and OOD detection. In contrast, our proposed method not only significantly outperforms baseline methods in both sentence-level and document-level text detection but also demonstrates strong generalization capabilities. Furthermore, since LLM-Detector is trained based on open-source LLMs, it is easy to customize for deployment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hidden Human-Like Nature of Machine-Generated Texts: Theory and Detection Enhancement

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Reveals hidden human-like spans in machine-generated texts that raise detection complexity and proposes a stacked enhancement framework with hard-EM optimization to improve detectors across LLMs.