Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Uncertainty-Aware Perceiver

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02433 v1 pith:PSADTMJ2 submitted 2024-02-04 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords perceiverperformancethreeuncertainty-awarearchitecturalmodelsperceiversuncertainty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Perceiver makes few architectural assumptions about the relationship among its inputs with quadratic scalability on its memory and computation time. Indeed, the Perceiver model outpaces or is competitive with ResNet-50 and ViT in terms of accuracy to some degree. However, the Perceiver does not take predictive uncertainty and calibration into account. The Perceiver also generalizes its performance on three datasets, three models, one evaluation metric, and one hyper-parameter setting. Worst of all, the Perceiver's relative performance improvement against other models is marginal. Furthermore, its reduction of architectural prior is not substantial; is not equivalent to its quality. Thereby, I invented five mutations of the Perceiver, the Uncertainty-Aware Perceivers, that obtain uncertainty estimates and measured their performance on three metrics. Experimented with CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, the Uncertainty-Aware Perceivers make considerable performance enhancement compared to the Perceiver.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools