Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Performance Assessment of Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: Challenges and Directions for Materials' Surfaces

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04217 v2 pith:ZX45ICKE submitted 2024-03-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.comp-ph

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.dis-nnphysics.comp-ph
keywords materialsmodelsmlipsuniversaluipsavailablebulkdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are one of the main techniques in the materials science toolbox, able to bridge ab initio accuracy with the computational efficiency of classical force fields. This allows simulations ranging from atoms, molecules, and biosystems, to solid and bulk materials, surfaces, nanomaterials, and their interfaces and complex interactions. A recent class of advanced MLIPs, which use equivariant representations and deep graph neural networks, is known as universal models. These models are proposed as foundational models suitable for any system, covering most elements from the periodic table. Current universal MLIPs (UIPs) have been trained with the largest consistent dataset available nowadays. However, these are composed mostly of bulk materials' DFT calculations. In this article, we assess the universality of all openly available UIPs, namely MACE, CHGNet, and M3GNet, in a representative task of generalization: calculation of surface energies. We find that the out-of-the-box foundational models have significant shortcomings in this task, with errors correlated to the total energy of surface simulations, having an out-of-domain distance from the training dataset. Our results show that while UIPs are an efficient starting point for fine-tuning specialized models, we envision the potential of increasing the coverage of the materials space towards universal training datasets for MLIPs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing classical and machine learning force fields for modeling deformation of solid sorbents relevant for direct air capture

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    No tested force field, classical or machine-learned, achieves the 0.1 eV accuracy target for adsorption energies in deformable MOFs relevant to direct air capture.

Pith tools