Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cross-Modal Learning of Housing Quality in Amsterdam

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08915 v1 pith:OGBYCZUR submitted 2024-03-13 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords imagesaerialfeaturesqualityamsterdamflickrground-levelhousing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In our research we test data and models for the recognition of housing quality in the city of Amsterdam from ground-level and aerial imagery. For ground-level images we compare Google StreetView (GSV) to Flickr images. Our results show that GSV predicts the most accurate building quality scores, approximately 30% better than using only aerial images. However, we find that through careful filtering and by using the right pre-trained model, Flickr image features combined with aerial image features are able to halve the performance gap to GSV features from 30% to 15%. Our results indicate that there are viable alternatives to GSV for liveability factor prediction, which is encouraging as GSV images are more difficult to acquire and not always available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools