REVIEW 10 cited by
COIG-CQIA: Quality is All You Need for Chinese Instruction Fine-tuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Remarkable progress on English instruction tuning has facilitated the efficacy and reliability of large language models (LLMs). However, there remains a noticeable gap in instruction tuning for Chinese, where the complex linguistic features pose significant challenges. Existing datasets, generally distilled from English-centric LLMs, are not well-aligned with Chinese users' interaction patterns. To bridge this gap, we introduce COIG-CQIA, a new Chinese instruction tuning dataset derived from various real-world resources and undergoing rigorous human verification. We conduct extensive experiments on COIG-CQIA, and compare them with strong baseline models and datasets. The experimental results show that models trained on COIG-CQIA achieve highly competitive performance in diverse benchmarks. Additionally, our findings offer several insights for designing effective Chinese instruction-tuning datasets and data-mixing strategies. Our dataset are available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/m-a-p/COIG-CQIA.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Chumor 2.0: Towards Benchmarking Chinese Humor Understanding
Chumor is a new Chinese humor explanation benchmark where LLMs perform near chance (best accuracy 60.3%) and well below human accuracy (78.3%).
-
Improving Natural Language Understanding for LLMs via Large-Scale Instruction Synthesis
A large synthetic instruction corpus with guidelines, preference rules, and format variants improves LLM performance on five NLU benchmarks by an average of 3.1%.
-
Mono-InternVL-1.5: Towards Cheaper and Faster Monolithic Multimodal Large Language Models
A monolithic multimodal LLM that cuts pre-training data by 58% and first-token latency by up to 69% while matching or beating its predecessor on 15 benchmarks.
-
CCI4.0: A Bilingual Pretraining Dataset for Enhancing Reasoning in Large Language Models
A new 35 TB bilingual pretraining dataset with 4.5 billion chain-of-thought templates is described, but the evidence for its benefits is marginal, confounded, and contradicted by the paper's own tables.
-
Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training
Reinforcing the two experts most correlated with thinking tokens improves reasoning accuracy and efficiency in MoE large reasoning models, with gains of up to 10 points on AIME benchmarks.
-
A Plug-and-Play Method for Improving Imperceptibility and Capacity in Practical Generative Text Steganography
FreStega adjusts language model token probabilities at decoding time, using entropy-based temperature and target-domain token frequency alignment, improving steganalysis resistance and increasing embedding rate by abo...
-
Small Language Model as Data Prospector for Large Language Model
SuperNUGGETS uses small language models and a refined 100-example test set to pick instruction data, matching the quality of the LLM-based NUGGETS at far lower cost.
-
GMAI-VL & GMAI-VL-5.5M: A Large Vision-Language Model and A Comprehensive Multimodal Dataset Towards General Medical AI
GMAI-VL-5.5M is a new 5.5M-sample medical image-text dataset built from 219 datasets via GPT-4o annotation-guided generation, and GMAI-VL is a three-stage LLaVA-style model reporting SOTA numbers, though the evaluatio...
-
Educational-Psychological Dialogue Robot Based on Multi-Agent Collaboration
A multi-agent dialogue system for education and psychological counseling, with benchmark results only for the educational component.
-
Loki's Dance of Illusions: A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models
A survey of LLM hallucination research that formalizes hallucination types and argues, via incompleteness and undecidability arguments, that hallucinations cannot be fully eliminated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.