LLM-RadJudge: Achieving Radiologist-Level Evaluation for X-Ray Report Generation
read the original abstract
Evaluating generated radiology reports is crucial for the development of radiology AI, but existing metrics fail to reflect the task's clinical requirements. This study proposes a novel evaluation framework using large language models (LLMs) to compare radiology reports for assessment. We compare the performance of various LLMs and demonstrate that, when using GPT-4, our proposed metric achieves evaluation consistency close to that of radiologists. Furthermore, to reduce costs and improve accessibility, making this method practical, we construct a dataset using LLM evaluation results and perform knowledge distillation to train a smaller model. The distilled model achieves evaluation capabilities comparable to GPT-4. Our framework and distilled model offer an accessible and efficient evaluation method for radiology report generation, facilitating the development of more clinically relevant models. The model will be further open-sourced and accessible.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs
CogAlign uses hierarchical supervised fine-tuning on clinical cognition data plus counterfactual RL to align MLLMs with expert diagnostic pathways and enforce causal lesion grounding for GI endoscopy diagnosis.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.