Towards Safety and Helpfulness Balanced Responses via Controllable Large Language Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:C5WJPCKWrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
As large language models (LLMs) become easily accessible nowadays, the trade-off between safety and helpfulness can significantly impact user experience. A model that prioritizes safety will cause users to feel less engaged and assisted while prioritizing helpfulness will potentially cause harm. Possible harms include teaching people how to build a bomb, exposing youth to inappropriate content, and hurting users' mental health. In this work, we propose to balance safety and helpfulness in diverse use cases by controlling both attributes in LLM. We explore training-free and fine-tuning methods that do not require extra human annotations and analyze the challenges of controlling safety and helpfulness in LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate that our method can rewind a learned model and unlock its controllability.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Addressing Over-Refusal in LLMs with Competing Rewards
SEAR trains one LLM via adversarial process rewards to explore harmful reasoning paths but flip to safe outputs, reducing over-refusal while preserving safety.
-
Evolving and Detecting Multi-Turn Deception using Geometric Signatures
Multi-objective genetic prompt optimization creates multi-turn deceptive datasets validated by humans, then detected with 0.89 recall using angular coverage, distance ratio, and linearity features in embeddings.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.