The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2404.02204 · v1 · pith:CSU3JJLS · submitted 2024-04-02 · cs.CL · cs.LG

Emergent Abilities in Reduced-Scale Generative Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:CSU3JJLSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords modelslanguagedatasizeemergentparameterssimplifiedability
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large language models can solve new tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. This ability, also known as in-context learning (ICL), is considered an emergent ability and is primarily seen in large language models with billions of parameters. This study investigates if such emergent properties are strictly tied to model size or can be demonstrated by smaller models trained on reduced-scale data. To explore this, we simplify pre-training data and pre-train 36 causal language models with parameters varying from 1 million to 165 million parameters. We show that models trained on this simplified pre-training data demonstrate enhanced zero-shot capabilities across various tasks in simplified language, achieving performance comparable to that of pre-trained models six times larger on unrestricted language. This suggests that downscaling the language allows zero-shot learning capabilities to emerge in models with limited size. Additionally, we find that these smaller models pre-trained on simplified data demonstrate a power law relationship between the evaluation loss and the three scaling factors: compute, dataset size, and model size.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reward-Free Code Alignment from Pretrained or Fine-Tuned LLM: Unpacking the Trade-offs for Code Generation

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Empirical study on five LLMs finds pretrained-to-aligned paths yield bigger gains over baseline than finetuned-to-aligned paths, though absolute accuracy remains lower for pretrained starts.