Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Determining the Tactical Challenge of Scenarios to Efficiently Test Automated Driving Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.02599 v2 pith:N7BVYEO4 submitted 2024-04-03 cs.SE cs.RO

classification cs.SEcs.RO
keywords challengescenariostestrelevantscenarioanalyzingautomatedchallenging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The selection of relevant test scenarios for the scenario-based testing and safety validation of automated driving systems (ADSs) remains challenging. An important aspect of the relevance of a scenario is the challenge it poses for an ADS. Existing methods for calculating the challenge of a scenario aim to express the challenge in terms of a metric value. Metric values are useful to select the least or most challenging scenario. However, they fail to provide human-interpretable information on the cause of the challenge which is critical information for the efficient selection of relevant test scenarios. Therefore, this paper presents the Challenge Description Method that mitigates this issue by analyzing scenarios and providing a description of their challenge in terms of the minimum required lane changes and their difficulty. Applying the method to different highway scenarios showed that it is capable of analyzing complex scenarios and providing easy-to-understand descriptions that can be used to select relevant test scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools