Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Practical Guidelines for Cell Segmentation Models Under Optical Aberrations in Microscopy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08549 v2 pith:6LNMCPSZ submitted 2024-04-12 eess.IV cs.CVphysics.bio-ph

classification eess.IVcs.CVphysics.bio-ph
keywords cellsegmentationaberrationsimagesundermodelsopticalmicroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cell segmentation is essential in biomedical research for analyzing cellular morphology and behavior. Deep learning methods, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have revolutionized cell segmentation by extracting intricate features from images. However, the robustness of these methods under microscope optical aberrations remains a critical challenge. This study evaluates cell image segmentation models under optical aberrations from fluorescence and bright field microscopy. By simulating different types of aberrations, including astigmatism, coma, spherical aberration, trefoil, and mixed aberrations, we conduct a thorough evaluation of various cell instance segmentation models using the DynamicNuclearNet (DNN) and LIVECell datasets, representing fluorescence and bright field microscopy cell datasets, respectively. We train and test several segmentation models, including the Otsu threshold method and Mask R-CNN with different network heads (FPN, C3) and backbones (ResNet, VGG, Swin Transformer), under aberrated conditions. Additionally, we provide usage recommendations for the Cellpose 2.0 Toolbox on complex cell degradation images. The results indicate that the combination of FPN and SwinS demonstrates superior robustness in handling simple cell images affected by minor aberrations. In contrast, Cellpose 2.0 proves effective for complex cell images under similar conditions. Furthermore, we innovatively propose the Point Spread Function Image Label Classification Model (PLCM). This model can quickly and accurately identify aberration types and amplitudes from PSF images, assisting researchers without optical training. Through PLCM, researchers can better apply our proposed cell segmentation guidelines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools