Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.13207 v3 pith:PO4SGFVW submitted 2024-04-19 cs.IR cs.LG

STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases

classification cs.IR cs.LG
keywords retrievalqueriesstarktextualbenchmarkrelationalbasescomplex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Answering real-world complex queries, such as complex product search, often requires accurate retrieval from semi-structured knowledge bases that involve blend of unstructured (e.g., textual descriptions of products) and structured (e.g., entity relations of products) information. However, many previous works studied textual and relational retrieval tasks as separate topics. To address the gap, we develop STARK, a large-scale Semi-structure retrieval benchmark on Textual and Relational Knowledge Bases. Our benchmark covers three domains: product search, academic paper search, and queries in precision medicine. We design a novel pipeline to synthesize realistic user queries that integrate diverse relational information and complex textual properties, together with their ground-truth answers (items). We conduct rigorous human evaluation to validate the quality of our synthesized queries. We further enhance the benchmark with high-quality human-generated queries to provide an authentic reference. STARK serves as a comprehensive testbed for evaluating the performance of retrieval systems driven by large language models (LLMs). Our experiments suggest that STARK presents significant challenges to the current retrieval and LLM systems, highlighting the need for more capable semi-structured retrieval systems. The benchmark data and code are available on https://github.com/snap-stanford/STaRK.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. WorkSurface-Bench: Benchmarking Enterprise Agents on Multi-Surface Knowledge Routing

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    WorkSurface-Bench measures surface routing separately from answer correctness and finds near-perfect routing still leaves 25–44% answer errors across four LLM backbones.