Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

Towards Large-Scale Training of Pathology Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15217 v1 pith:LEGEXGT4 submitted 2024-03-24 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords pathologyevaluationimagesmodelstrainingvariousdownstreamfoundation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Driven by the recent advances in deep learning methods and, in particular, by the development of modern self-supervised learning algorithms, increased interest and efforts have been devoted to build foundation models (FMs) for medical images. In this work, we present our scalable training pipeline for large pathology imaging data, and a comprehensive analysis of various hyperparameter choices and training techniques for building pathology FMs. We release and make publicly available the first batch of our pathology FMs (https://github.com/kaiko-ai/towards_large_pathology_fms) trained on open-access TCGA whole slide images, a commonly used collection of pathology images. The experimental evaluation shows that our models reach state-of-the-art performance on various patch-level downstream tasks, ranging from breast cancer subtyping to colorectal nuclear segmentation. Finally, to unify the evaluation approaches used in the field and to simplify future comparisons of different FMs, we present an open-source framework (https://github.com/kaiko-ai/eva) designed for the consistent evaluation of pathology FMs across various downstream tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Robust Foundation Models for Digital Pathology

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PathoROB shows that all 20 evaluated pathology foundation models encode medical center information and that lower robustness correlates with larger downstream performance drops.

  2. Current Pathology Foundation Models are unrobust to Medical Center Differences

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ten pathology foundation models encode medical center identity more strongly than cancer type in their embeddings, according to a new Robustness Index.

  3. GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash: Efficient Pathology Foundation Models for Whole-Slide and Tumor Microenvironment Analysis

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Distilled, Apache-2.0-licensed GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash models deliver most of the original models' accuracy at a fraction of the compute and memory.

  4. Atlas 2 -- Foundation models for clinical deployment

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Atlas 2 and its distilled variants set new average state-of-the-art results across 80 pathology benchmarks, with larger robustness margins over prior models.

  5. Reusable specimen-level inference in computational pathology

    eess.IV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SpinPath packages pretrained specimen-level pathology models with Python and browser inference tools and benchmarks them on an external breast cancer metastasis dataset.

  6. Atlas: A Novel Pathology Foundation Model by Mayo Clinic, Charit\'e, and Aignostics

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Atlas, a 632M-parameter ViT pathology model trained on 1.2M multi-stain slides, achieves a 61.9 percent average on 21 public benchmarks, the best among seven leading foundation models.

  7. Are the Latent Representations of Foundation Models for Pathology Invariant to Rotation?

    eess.IV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rotated pathology image patches produce more similar latent representations in models that used rotation augmentation during self-supervised training.

  8. A Survey on Computational Pathology Foundation Models: Datasets, Adaptation Strategies, and Evaluation Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic literature review of computational pathology foundation models that catalogs datasets, SSL adaptation strategies, and evaluation tasks into taxonomies.

Pith tools