Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17583 v1 pith:IMNAQHKA submitted 2024-05-27 cs.LG

Understanding Forgetting in Continual Learning with Linear Regression

classification cs.LG
keywords forgettingtheoreticallearninglinearregressiontasksanalysiscontinual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Continual learning, focused on sequentially learning multiple tasks, has gained significant attention recently. Despite the tremendous progress made in the past, the theoretical understanding, especially factors contributing to catastrophic forgetting, remains relatively unexplored. In this paper, we provide a general theoretical analysis of forgetting in the linear regression model via Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) applicable to both underparameterized and overparameterized regimes. Our theoretical framework reveals some interesting insights into the intricate relationship between task sequence and algorithmic parameters, an aspect not fully captured in previous studies due to their restrictive assumptions. Specifically, we demonstrate that, given a sufficiently large data size, the arrangement of tasks in a sequence, where tasks with larger eigenvalues in their population data covariance matrices are trained later, tends to result in increased forgetting. Additionally, our findings highlight that an appropriate choice of step size will help mitigate forgetting in both underparameterized and overparameterized settings. To validate our theoretical analysis, we conducted simulation experiments on both linear regression models and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Results from these simulations substantiate our theoretical findings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much is Brain Data Worth for Machine Learning?

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Brain data is worth a variable number of task samples depending on task-brain alignment, noise levels, and latent dimension, with conditions under which it also improves robustness to test distribution shift.

  2. Benign Overfitting in Adversarial Training for Vision Transformers

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Adversarial training on simplified Vision Transformers achieves benign overfitting with near-zero robust loss and generalization error when signal-to-noise ratio and perturbation budget meet specific conditions.

  3. SLE-FNO: Single-Layer Extensions for Task-Agnostic Continual Learning in Fourier Neural Operators

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SLE-FNO achieves zero forgetting and strong plasticity-stability balance in continual learning for FNO surrogate models of pulsatile blood flow by adding minimal single-layer extensions across four out-of-distribution tasks.