Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Benefits and Risks of Transductive Approaches for AI Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12011 v1 pith:5LTU4IJG submitted 2024-06-17 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords holdoutfairnesssetsimbalancedlearningtrainingtransductiveaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, transductive learning methods, which leverage holdout sets during training, have gained popularity for their potential to improve speed, accuracy, and fairness in machine learning models. Despite this, the composition of the holdout set itself, particularly the balance of sensitive sub-groups, has been largely overlooked. Our experiments on CIFAR and CelebA datasets show that compositional changes in the holdout set can substantially influence fairness metrics. Imbalanced holdout sets exacerbate existing disparities, while balanced holdouts can mitigate issues introduced by imbalanced training data. These findings underline the necessity of constructing holdout sets that are both diverse and representative.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools