REVIEW 3 cited by
Reproducibility of predictive networks for mouse visual cortex
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Reproducibility of predictive networks for mouse visual cortex
read the original abstract
Deep predictive models of neuronal activity have recently enabled several new discoveries about the selectivity and invariance of neurons in the visual cortex. These models learn a shared set of nonlinear basis functions, which are linearly combined via a learned weight vector to represent a neuron's function. Such weight vectors, which can be thought as embeddings of neuronal function, have been proposed to define functional cell types via unsupervised clustering. However, as deep models are usually highly overparameterized, the learning problem is unlikely to have a unique solution, which raises the question if such embeddings can be used in a meaningful way for downstream analysis. In this paper, we investigate how stable neuronal embeddings are with respect to changes in model architecture and initialization. We find that $L_1$ regularization to be an important ingredient for structured embeddings and develop an adaptive regularization that adjusts the strength of regularization per neuron. This regularization improves both predictive performance and how consistently neuronal embeddings cluster across model fits compared to uniform regularization. To overcome overparametrization, we propose an iterative feature pruning strategy which reduces the dimensionality of performance-optimized models by half without loss of performance and improves the consistency of neuronal embeddings with respect to clustering neurons. This result suggests that to achieve an objective taxonomy of cell types or a compact representation of the functional landscape, we need novel architectures or learning techniques that improve identifiability. We will make our code available at publication time.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Beyond Neural Activity Prediction: Probing Latent Representations in Mouse V1 Digital Twins
V1 digital twins with different architectures but comparable neural prediction accuracy differ in linear probe performance, latent-unit tuning, and hidden-layer eigenspectra.
-
Decoding Alignment without Encoding Alignment: A critique of similarity analysis in neuroscience
Decoding alignment metrics can remain high and unchanged even when encoding manifold topology is causally altered, so they do not imply similar function or computation across neural populations.
-
Beyond Neural Activity Prediction: Probing Latent Representations in Mouse V1 Digital Twins
V1 digital twins with comparable neural prediction accuracy differ in linear probe performance, unit tuning, and hidden-layer eigenspectra.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.