Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Prospecting for Pluripotency in Metamaterial Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14980 v1 pith:D2QXMWQD submitted 2024-06-21 cond-mat.soft

Prospecting for Pluripotency in Metamaterial Design

classification cond-mat.soft
keywords designmetamaterialscombinatorialoptimizationpluripotentdeformationsdesignsdirect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

From self-assembly and protein folding to combinatorial metamaterials, a key challenge in material design is finding the right combination of interacting building blocks that yield targeted properties. Such structures are fiendishly difficult to find; not only are they rare, but often the design space is so rough that gradients are useless and direct optimization is hopeless. Here, we design ultra rare combinatorial metamaterials capable of multiple desired deformations by introducing a two-fold strategy that avoids the drawbacks of direct optimization. We first combine convolutional neural networks with genetic algorithms to prospect for metamaterial designs with a potential for high performance. In our case, these metamaterials have a high number of spatially extended modes; they are pluripotent. Second, we exploit this library of pluripotent designs to generate metamaterials with multiple target deformations, which we finally refine by strategically placing defects. Our pluripotent, multishape metamaterials would be impossible to design through trial-and-error or standard optimization. Instead, our data-driven approach is systematic and ideally suited to tackling the large and intractable combinatorial problems that are pervasive in material science.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.