Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Composable Interventions for Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.06483 v2 pith:JMRPCMEU submitted 2024-07-09 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords interventionslanguagemodelmodelscomposabilitycomposablecompressiondifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Test-time interventions for language models can enhance factual accuracy, mitigate harmful outputs, and improve model efficiency without costly retraining. But despite a flood of new methods, different types of interventions are largely developing independently. In practice, multiple interventions must be applied sequentially to the same model, yet we lack standardized ways to study how interventions interact. We fill this gap by introducing composable interventions, a framework to study the effects of using multiple interventions on the same language models, featuring new metrics and a unified codebase. Using our framework, we conduct extensive experiments and compose popular methods from three emerging intervention categories -- Knowledge Editing, Model Compression, and Machine Unlearning. Our results from 310 different compositions uncover meaningful interactions: compression hinders editing and unlearning, composing interventions hinges on their order of application, and popular general-purpose metrics are inadequate for assessing composability. Taken together, our findings showcase clear gaps in composability, suggesting a need for new multi-objective interventions. All of our code is public: https://github.com/hartvigsen-group/composable-interventions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Steering Language Model Refusal with Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Boosting one SAE 'refusal' feature in Phi-3 Mini and Llama 3.1 raises refusal rates on unsafe and safe prompts alike while sharply reducing MMLU, TruthfulQA, and GSM8K accuracy.

Pith tools