pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.08739 · v2 · pith:NATOKERNnew · submitted 2024-07-11 · 💻 cs.CV

MAVIS: Mathematical Visual Instruction Tuning with an Automatic Data Engine

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords visualmathematicaldatainstructionmavismavis-captionmllmsmodel
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The mathematical capabilities of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remain under-explored with three areas to be improved: visual encoding of math diagrams, diagram-language alignment, and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. This draws forth an urgent demand for an effective training paradigm and a large-scale, comprehensive dataset with detailed CoT rationales, which is challenging to collect and costly to annotate manually. To tackle this issue, we propose MAVIS, a MAthematical VISual instruction tuning pipeline for MLLMs, featuring an automatic data engine to efficiently create mathematical visual datasets. We design the data generation process to be entirely independent of human intervention or GPT API usage, while ensuring the diagram-caption correspondence, question-answer correctness, and CoT reasoning quality. With this approach, we curate two datasets, MAVIS-Caption (558K diagram-caption pairs) and MAVIS-Instruct (834K visual math problems with CoT rationales), and propose four progressive stages for training MLLMs from scratch. First, we utilize MAVIS-Caption to fine-tune a math-specific vision encoder (CLIP-Math) through contrastive learning, tailored for improved diagram visual encoding. Second, we also leverage MAVIS-Caption to align the CLIP-Math with a large language model (LLM) by a projection layer, enhancing vision-language alignment in mathematical domains. Third, we adopt MAVIS-Instruct to perform the instruction tuning for robust problem-solving skills, and term the resulting model as MAVIS-7B. Fourth, we apply Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to enhance the CoT capabilities of our model, further refining its step-wise reasoning performance. Code and data will be released at https://github.com/ZrrSkywalker/MAVIS

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are Tools Always Beneficial? Learning to Invoke Tools Adaptively for Dual-Mode Multimodal LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    AutoTool uses reinforcement learning with dual-mode rewards to train multimodal LLMs to adaptively choose between tool-assisted and text-centric reasoning, yielding accuracy and efficiency gains on V* and POPE benchmarks.

  2. MICo-150K: A Comprehensive Dataset Advancing Multi-Image Composition

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MICo-150K is a new 150K-image dataset with 7 tasks, a De&Re real-image subset, MICo-Bench, and Weighted-Ref-VIEScore metric that improves AI models for generating consistent composites from arbitrary numbers of refere...

  3. LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2024-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave unifies multi-image, video, and 3D capabilities in large multimodal models via a new 1.18M-sample interleaved dataset and benchmark, achieving leading results across those tasks while preserving ...

  4. MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?

    cs.CV 2024-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    MathVerse is a benchmark that tests multi-modal LLMs on visual math by providing each problem in six versions with progressively less diagram and text information to measure true visual understanding.

  5. Are Tools Always Beneficial? Learning to Invoke Tools Adaptively for Dual-Mode Multimodal LLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AutoTool uses dual-mode RL to let MLLMs adaptively choose tool use or text-only reasoning, reporting 21.8% accuracy gain on V* and 44.9% efficiency gain on POPE versus baselines.

  6. InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    InternVL3-78B sets a new open-source SOTA of 72.2 on MMMU via native joint multimodal pre-training, V2PE, MPO, and test-time scaling while remaining competitive with proprietary models.

  7. MathFlow: Enhancing the Perceptual Flow of MLLMs for Visual Mathematical Problems

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MathFlow decouples perception and inference stages in MLLMs for visual math, with a dedicated perception model delivering gains on the FlowVerse benchmark when paired with existing reasoners.

  8. Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    Mixed Preference Optimization with the MMPR dataset boosts multimodal CoT reasoning, lifting InternVL2-8B to 67.0 accuracy on MathVista (+8.7 points) and matching the 76B model.

  9. NoisyGRPO: Incentivizing Multimodal CoT Reasoning via Noise Injection and Bayesian Estimation

    cs.CV 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NoisyGRPO is an RL framework that perturbs visual inputs with Gaussian noise for exploration and computes trajectory advantages via Bayesian posterior fusion of noise prior and reward likelihood to improve multimodal ...

  10. DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understanding

    cs.CV 2024-12 accept novelty 5.0

    DeepSeek-VL2 is a series of MoE vision-language models using dynamic tiling and latent attention that reach competitive or state-of-the-art results on VQA, OCR, document understanding and grounding with 1.0B to 4.5B a...

  11. Vision-EKIPL: External Knowledge-Infused Policy Learning for Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Vision-EKIPL injects high-quality actions from external models into RL training to expand exploration and raise the reasoning ceiling of MLLMs, reporting up to 5% gains on the Reason-RFT-CoT benchmark.

  12. Artificial Intelligence for Mathematical Reasoning: An Integrated Survey of Language Models, Neuro-symbolic Systems, and Verified Discovery

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An integrated survey organizing AI mathematical reasoning into informal, formal, discovery, and technique axes while cataloging benchmarks and assessing failure modes.

  13. Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.