Pith. sign in

REVIEW

XEQ Scale for Evaluating XAI Experience Quality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10662 v4 pith:O4BWNYTN submitted 2024-07-15 cs.AI cs.HC

XEQ Scale for Evaluating XAI Experience Quality

classification cs.AI cs.HC
keywords scaleevaluatingexperienceexperiencesexplanationsqualityuser-centredvalidation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to improve the transparency of autonomous decision-making through explanations. Recent literature has emphasised users' need for holistic "multi-shot" explanations and personalised engagement with XAI systems. We refer to this user-centred interaction as an XAI Experience. Despite advances in creating XAI experiences, evaluating them in a user-centred manner has remained challenging. In response, we developed the XAI Experience Quality (XEQ) Scale. XEQ quantifies the quality of experiences across four dimensions: learning, utility, fulfilment and engagement. These contributions extend the state-of-the-art of XAI evaluation, moving beyond the one-dimensional metrics frequently developed to assess single-shot explanations. This paper presents the XEQ scale development and validation process, including content validation with XAI experts, and discriminant and construct validation through a large-scale pilot study. Our pilot study results offer strong evidence that establishes the XEQ Scale as a comprehensive framework for evaluating user-centred XAI experiences.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.