REVIEW 2 cited by
Building Living Software Systems with Generative & Agentic AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Building Living Software Systems with Generative & Agentic AI
read the original abstract
This paper is an opinion paper that looks at the future of computing in the age of Generative \& Agentic AI. Current software systems are static and inflexible, leading to significant challenges in translating human goals into computational actions. "Living software systems" powered by generative AI offer a solution to this fundamental problem in computing. Traditional software development involves multiple layers of imperfect translation, from business requirements to code, resulting in rigid systems that struggle to adapt to changing user needs and contexts. Generative AI, particularly large language models, can serve as a universal translator between human intent and computer operations. This approach enables the creation of more flexible, context-aware systems that can dynamically evolve to meet user goals. Two pathways for implementing living software systems are explored: using generative AI to accelerate traditional software development, and leveraging agentic AI to create truly adaptive systems. New skills like Prompt Engineering are necessary. By reimagining software as a living, adaptable entity, we can create computing interfaces that are more intuitive, powerful, and responsive to human needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How Far Are We from Generating Missing Modalities with Foundation Models?
Evaluates 42 variants of foundation models across three formalized paradigms for missing modality reconstruction, identifies shortfalls in semantic extraction and validation, and introduces an agentic framework that r...
-
Exploring Individual Factors in the Adoption of LLMs for Specific Software Engineering Purposes
Survey of 188 engineers using SEM finds that UTAUT2 constructs influence LLM adoption differently across five SE purposes, with some factors showing negative effects when examined in isolation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.