Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Building Living Software Systems with Generative & Agentic AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.01768 v1 pith:ASIDSHPV submitted 2024-08-03 cs.SE

Building Living Software Systems with Generative & Agentic AI

classification cs.SE
keywords softwaresystemsgenerativelivingagenticcomputinghumancreate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is an opinion paper that looks at the future of computing in the age of Generative \& Agentic AI. Current software systems are static and inflexible, leading to significant challenges in translating human goals into computational actions. "Living software systems" powered by generative AI offer a solution to this fundamental problem in computing. Traditional software development involves multiple layers of imperfect translation, from business requirements to code, resulting in rigid systems that struggle to adapt to changing user needs and contexts. Generative AI, particularly large language models, can serve as a universal translator between human intent and computer operations. This approach enables the creation of more flexible, context-aware systems that can dynamically evolve to meet user goals. Two pathways for implementing living software systems are explored: using generative AI to accelerate traditional software development, and leveraging agentic AI to create truly adaptive systems. New skills like Prompt Engineering are necessary. By reimagining software as a living, adaptable entity, we can create computing interfaces that are more intuitive, powerful, and responsive to human needs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Far Are We from Generating Missing Modalities with Foundation Models?

    cs.MM 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Evaluates 42 variants of foundation models across three formalized paradigms for missing modality reconstruction, identifies shortfalls in semantic extraction and validation, and introduces an agentic framework that r...

  2. Exploring Individual Factors in the Adoption of LLMs for Specific Software Engineering Purposes

    cs.SE 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Survey of 188 engineers using SEM finds that UTAUT2 constructs influence LLM adoption differently across five SE purposes, with some factors showing negative effects when examined in isolation.