Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying the Corpus Bias Problem in Automatic Music Transcription Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04737 v1 pith:6W27IB7S submitted 2024-08-08 cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS

Quantifying the Corpus Bias Problem in Automatic Music Transcription Systems

classification cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS
keywords musicsystemsautomaticbiascorpusdistributionmusicalperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Automatic Music Transcription (AMT) is the task of recognizing notes in audio recordings of music. The State-of-the-Art (SotA) benchmarks have been dominated by deep learning systems. Due to the scarcity of high quality data, they are usually trained and evaluated exclusively or predominantly on classical piano music. Unfortunately, that hinders our ability to understand how they generalize to other music. Previous works have revealed several aspects of memorization and overfitting in these systems. We identify two primary sources of distribution shift: the music, and the sound. Complementing recent results on the sound axis (i.e. acoustics, timbre), we investigate the musical one (i.e. note combinations, dynamics, genre). We evaluate the performance of several SotA AMT systems on two new experimental test sets which we carefully construct to emulate different levels of musical distribution shift. Our results reveal a stark performance gap, shedding further light on the Corpus Bias problem, and the extent to which it continues to trouble these systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.