pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.05215 · v1 · pith:VNYUVQMDnew · submitted 2024-09-08 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Synthetic Tabular Data Generation for Class Imbalance and Fairness: A Comparative Study

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords classdatagroupimbalancestabulargenerationimbalancemodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Due to their data-driven nature, Machine Learning (ML) models are susceptible to bias inherited from data, especially in classification problems where class and group imbalances are prevalent. Class imbalance (in the classification target) and group imbalance (in protected attributes like sex or race) can undermine both ML utility and fairness. Although class and group imbalances commonly coincide in real-world tabular datasets, limited methods address this scenario. While most methods use oversampling techniques, like interpolation, to mitigate imbalances, recent advancements in synthetic tabular data generation offer promise but have not been adequately explored for this purpose. To this end, this paper conducts a comparative analysis to address class and group imbalances using state-of-the-art models for synthetic tabular data generation and various sampling strategies. Experimental results on four datasets, demonstrate the effectiveness of generative models for bias mitigation, creating opportunities for further exploration in this direction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can Synthetic Data be Fair and Private? A Comparative Study of Synthetic Data Generation and Fairness Algorithms

    cs.LG 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DECAF synthetic data generator best balances privacy and fairness while fairness pre-processing improves outcomes more on synthetic data than real data, though at some cost to predictive accuracy.