REVIEW 3 cited by
Lunar References Systems, Frames and Time-scales in the context of the ESA Programme Moonlight
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Lunar reference systems represent a fundamental aspect of lunar exploration. This paper presents a review of the topic in the context of the ESA lunar programme, MoonLight. This paper describes the current state of the art in the definition of the lunar reference frame and introduces TCL, a lunar time scale based on IAU resolutions. It also proposes several possible implementations of this time scale for orbiting and ground-based clocks. Finally, it provides an assessment of the improvement of the lunar reference frame that would result from the addition of lunar retro-reflectors on the Moon surface and the use of orbiter altimetry. This document is an appendix dedicated to lunar reference system definition of a more global document dedicated to the presentation of new concepts in orbit determination and time synchronization of a lunar radio navigation system.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Earth-baseline VLBI restores the observability of a lunar surface station in joint orbit-and-clock determination
Internal lunar ranging leaves a six-dimensional rigid-body datum defect; Earth-baseline VLBI restores absolute station observability for sparse constellations and only sharpens the CRLB for rich ones, closing at three...
-
The International Lunar Reference System
ILuRF2026 combines DE430, INPOP21a, and EPM2021 into the first International Lunar Reference Frame, with LLR residual RMS of 1.7–3.6 cm.
-
Relativistic Time Modeling for Lunar Positioning Navigation and Timing
A master's thesis that validates TCL formulations, maps lunar surface clock drift at ±15 ns/day, and finds Moonlight-type orbiters run about 1.99 µs/day faster than lunar surface clocks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.