Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Solving Max-3SAT Using QUBO Approximation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15891 v1 pith:LUKGFTQD submitted 2024-09-24 quant-ph

Solving Max-3SAT Using QUBO Approximation

classification quant-ph
keywords qubomax-3satexactquantumrepresentationsapproximationannealercontemporary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As contemporary quantum computers do not possess error correction, any calculation performed by these devices can be considered an involuntary approximation. To solve a problem on a quantum annealer, it has to be expressed as an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). In this work, we thus study whether systematically approximating QUBO representations of the MAX-3SAT problem can improve the solution quality when solved on contemporary quantum hardware, compared to using exact, non-approximated QUBO representations. For a MAX-3SAT instance consisting of a 3SAT formula with n variables and m clauses, we propose a method of systematically creating approximate QUBO representations of dimension (n x n), which is significantly smaller than the QUBO matrices of any exact, non-approximated MAX-3SAT QUBO transformation. In an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that using our QUBO approximations for solving MAX-3SAT problems on D-Wave's quantum annealer Advantage_System6.4 can yield better results than using state-of-the-art exact QUBO transformations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using naive QUBO approximation methods, based on removing values from exact (n+m)x(n+m)-dimensional QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT instances is ineffective.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.