Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Low-Rank Continual Personalization of Diffusion Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.04891 v3 pith:YVUHEXNW submitted 2024-10-07 cs.LG

Low-Rank Continual Personalization of Diffusion Models

classification cs.LG
keywords adaptersmodelscontinualmergingmethodstechniquesapproachconsecutive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent personalization methods for diffusion models, such as Dreambooth and LoRA, allow fine-tuning pre-trained models to generate new concepts. However, applying these techniques across consecutive tasks in order to include, e.g., new objects or styles, leads to a forgetting of previous knowledge due to mutual interference between their adapters. In this work, we tackle the problem of continual customization under a rigorous regime with no access to past tasks' adapters. In such a scenario, we investigate how different adapters' initialization and merging methods can improve the quality of the final model. To that end, we evaluate the naive continual fine-tuning of customized models and compare this approach with three methods for consecutive adapters' training: sequentially merging new adapters, merging orthogonally initialized adapters, and updating only relevant task-specific weights. In our experiments, we show that the proposed techniques mitigate forgetting when compared to the naive approach. In our studies, we show different traits of selected techniques and their effect on the plasticity and stability of the continually adapted model. Repository with the code is available at https://github.com/luk-st/continual-lora.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Style Similarity Scores Fail: Diagnosing Raw CSD Cosine in Artist-Style Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Raw CSD cosine similarity produces negative discrimination gaps for many artists and does not support absolute style-fidelity interpretation, but CSLS readout on frozen backbones reduces failures and improves AUC.

  2. When Style Similarity Scores Fail: Diagnosing Raw CSD Cosine in Artist-Style Evaluation

    cs.CV 2026-05 accept novelty 6.0

    Raw CSD cosine is not a calibrated absolute style score for many artists; a discrimination-gap diagnostic flags the failures and CSLS on the frozen backbone corrects most of them.