Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LogLM: From Task-based to Instruction-based Automated Log Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09352 v2 pith:EP4WLZNG submitted 2024-10-12 cs.SE cs.CL

classification cs.SEcs.CL
keywords analysismodeltaskstrainingapproachescomplexloglmpairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic log analysis is essential for the efficient Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of software systems, providing critical insights into system behaviors. However, existing approaches mostly treat log analysis as training a model to perform an isolated task ( e.g., anomaly detection, log parsing, etc.) using task-specific log-label pairs. These task-based approaches are inflexible in generalizing to complex scenarios, depend on task-specific training data, and cost significantly when deploying multiple models. In this paper, we propose an instruction-based training approach that transforms log-label pairs from multiple tasks and domains into a unified format of instruction-response pairs. Our trained model, LogLM, can follow complex user instructions and generalize better across different tasks, thereby increasing flexibility and reducing the dependence on task-specific training data. By integrating major log analysis tasks into a single model, our approach also relieves model deployment burden. Experimentally, LogLM outperforms existing approaches across five log analysis capabilities, and exhibits strong generalization abilities on complex instructions and unseen tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Language Models Generate Observability-Aware Code?

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI coding agents produce microservice systems where only 4.95–13.99% of injected faults generate explicit fault signals in logs, revealing a semantic observability gap that lightweight guidance only partially addresses.

  2. Adapting Large Language Models to Log Analysis with Interpretable Domain Knowledge

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    SuperLog, a LLaMA-2-7B model continually pre-trained on an LLM-generated natural-language QA corpus about logs, claims state-of-the-art results on four log analysis tasks.

  3. Adaptive Root Cause Localization for Microservice Systems with Multi-Agent Recursion-of-Thought

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    RCLAgent, a multi-agent recursion-of-thought system, reports Recall@1 of 71-90% on AIOps 2022 subsets from one trace, beating the Recall@10 of graph-based methods that need many requests.

  4. A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic survey that categorizes LLM-based AIOps research into four dimensions: data sources, tasks, methods, and evaluation, claiming to be the first comprehensive such overview.

Pith tools