pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.09391 · v3 · submitted 2024-10-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Geometric indicators of local plasticity in glasses measured by scanning small-beam diffraction

Amelia C. Y. Liu , Huyen Pham , Arabinda Bera , Timothy C. Petersen , Timothy W. Sirk , Stephen T. Mudie , Rico F. Tabor , Juan Nunez-Iglesias
show 2 more authors
Alessio Zaccone Matteo Baggioli
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords glassesplasticityBurgers vectordiffractiondeformationcentrosymmetrylocal strain
0
0 comments X

The pith

The continuous Burgers vector from pre- and post-deformation diffraction reliably marks local plastic events in glasses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether geometric quantities extracted from small-beam diffraction can serve as proxies for plastic deformation in glasses, which lack the periodic reference lattice that makes the Burgers vector straightforward in crystals. It shows that coordinated changes in local centrosymmetry flag plastic events, while the continuous Burgers vector and quadrupolar strain derived from measured distortions before and after deformation quantify the slip. A sympathetic reader would care because this approach offers a diffraction-based route to locate and characterize defects in disordered solids without assuming crystallinity. If the mapping holds, it extends the defect concept beyond periodic materials and supplies a practical experimental handle on how glasses yield under load.

Core claim

Glasses lack periodicity and thus a well-defined reference state, yet measurable structural parameters can still be obtained from diffraction. Co-ordinated transformations in the centrosymmetry of local particle arrangements are a strong marker of plastic events. Determining the local distortions corresponding to these plastic events requires measurements before and after deformation. Two geometric indicators can be derived from these distortions: the continuous Burgers vector and the quadrupolar strain. The Burgers vector emerges as a robust and sensitive metric for understanding local structural transformations due to mechanical deformation, even in disordered glasses.

What carries the argument

The continuous Burgers vector, obtained by integrating local distortions measured by scanning small-beam diffraction before and after deformation.

If this is right

  • Coordinated centrosymmetry changes serve as an independent marker that plastic events have occurred.
  • Quadrupolar strain extracted from the same distortions provides a second geometric descriptor of local slip.
  • The Burgers vector remains sensitive to the direction and magnitude of slip even when the underlying structure is disordered.
  • Scanning small-beam diffraction can therefore locate and characterize plastic events in glasses without requiring a crystalline reference state.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same before-and-after diffraction protocol could be applied to other amorphous solids such as metallic glasses or polymers to test whether the Burgers vector remains diagnostic.
  • If the continuous Burgers vector correlates with energy dissipation, it could guide models that predict where shear bands will nucleate under varying strain rates.
  • Extending the measurement to include temperature or strain-rate dependence would show whether the indicator remains robust when thermal activation competes with mechanical slip.

Load-bearing premise

Diffraction parameters measured before and after deformation can be converted into a continuous Burgers vector that faithfully captures plastic events even though glasses have no reference lattice.

What would settle it

Compare the continuous Burgers vector values extracted from diffraction against the actual particle displacements tracked in the same glass sample by direct imaging or molecular-dynamics simulation; mismatch in magnitude or direction at known plastic sites would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

The notion of defects in crystalline phases of matter has been extremely powerful for understanding crystal growth, deformation and melting. Many of these discontinuities in the periodic order of crystals are well described by the Burgers vector, derived from the particle displacements, which encapsulates the direction and magnitude of slip relative to the undeformed state. Since the reference structure of the crystal is known a priori, the Burgers vector can be determined experimentally using both imaging and diffraction methods to measure the final lattice distortion, and thus infer the particle displacements. Glasses have structures that lack the periodicity of crystals, and thus a well-defined reference state. Yet, measurable structural parameters can still be obtained from diffraction from a glass. Here we examine the usefulness of these parameters to probe deformation in glasses. We find that co-ordinated transformations in the centrosymmetry of local particle arrangements are a strong marker of plastic events. For a glass, determining the local distortions corresponding to these plastic events requires measurements before and after deformation. We investigate two geometric indicators that can be derived from these distortions, namely the continuous Burgers vector and the quadrupolar strain. We find that the Burgers vector again emerges as a robust and sensitive metric for understanding local structural transformations due to mechanical deformation, even in disordered glasses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines geometric indicators of local plasticity in glasses via scanning small-beam diffraction. It identifies coordinated changes in centrosymmetry of local particle arrangements as markers of plastic events and derives two metrics from before-and-after local distortion measurements: a continuous Burgers vector and quadrupolar strain. The central claim is that the continuous Burgers vector emerges as a robust and sensitive metric for local structural transformations due to mechanical deformation, even in the absence of a reference lattice.

Significance. If the robustness of the continuous Burgers vector holds under explicit tests, the work would offer a concrete bridge between defect concepts in crystals and deformation mechanisms in amorphous solids, potentially enabling quantitative tracking of plastic events via diffraction without assuming periodicity. The before-and-after measurement protocol is a clear strength for isolating deformation-induced changes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Method of vector construction] The abstract states that the continuous Burgers vector 'emerges as robust' from local distortions measured before and after deformation, yet the construction of this vector from the distortion field necessarily requires an integration path or averaging length scale. No demonstration is provided that the reported vector magnitude and direction remain stable under variation of these analysis parameters (e.g., probe size or path choice), which is load-bearing for the claim that the metric faithfully captures plastic events in a structure lacking a reference lattice.
  2. [Results on centrosymmetry and strain indicators] The claim that centrosymmetry transformations are a 'strong marker' of plastic events is presented without quantitative comparison to alternative structural indicators or to the quadrupolar strain metric; the relative sensitivity and specificity of the Burgers vector versus these alternatives is therefore not established in the reported data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'again' in 'the Burgers vector again emerges,' but the manuscript does not cite or compare to prior continuous-Burgers-vector definitions in glasses; a brief reference to the relevant literature would clarify the novelty.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the local distortion field and the precise definition of the continuous Burgers vector should be introduced with an equation in the methods section to allow readers to reproduce the integration procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding metric robustness and quantitative validation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Method of vector construction] The abstract states that the continuous Burgers vector 'emerges as robust' from local distortions measured before and after deformation, yet the construction of this vector from the distortion field necessarily requires an integration path or averaging length scale. No demonstration is provided that the reported vector magnitude and direction remain stable under variation of these analysis parameters (e.g., probe size or path choice), which is load-bearing for the claim that the metric faithfully captures plastic events in a structure lacking a reference lattice.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tests of invariance to integration path and averaging length scale (including probe size) are necessary to substantiate the robustness claim for a non-periodic structure. The methods section outlines the vector construction from the measured distortion field, but the manuscript does not include systematic variation tests. In the revised manuscript we will add this analysis, demonstrating stability of magnitude and direction across a range of path choices and probe sizes using the before-and-after diffraction datasets. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on centrosymmetry and strain indicators] The claim that centrosymmetry transformations are a 'strong marker' of plastic events is presented without quantitative comparison to alternative structural indicators or to the quadrupolar strain metric; the relative sensitivity and specificity of the Burgers vector versus these alternatives is therefore not established in the reported data.

    Authors: The manuscript identifies coordinated centrosymmetry changes through direct spatial correlation with plastic events extracted from the strain field. We acknowledge that this leaves the relative performance unquantified. In revision we will add a quantitative comparison section, including metrics such as correlation strength and classification performance of centrosymmetry, continuous Burgers vector, and quadrupolar strain against the same set of deformation-induced events. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; metrics derived directly from before/after diffraction data without reduction to fits or self-citations.

full rationale

The provided abstract and text describe geometric indicators (centrosymmetry, continuous Burgers vector, quadrupolar strain) obtained from measured local distortions before and after deformation. No equations, self-citations, or ansatzes are quoted that would make any reported metric equivalent to its inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions about diffraction from disordered media and the interpretation of centrosymmetry as a plasticity marker; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Diffraction patterns from a glass encode local particle arrangements sufficiently to extract centrosymmetry and distortion measures that track plastic events.
    Invoked when the abstract states that 'measurable structural parameters can still be obtained from diffraction from a glass' and that these can mark plastic events.
  • domain assumption Measurements before and after deformation allow inference of local distortions corresponding to plastic events even without a periodic reference state.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the requirement for determining local distortions in glasses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1358 out tokens · 19838 ms · 2026-05-23T19:29:28.396773+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    Cottrell, A.H.: Dislocations and Plastic Flow in Crystals. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    work page 1961

  2. [2]

    Burgers, J.M.: Geometrical considerations concerning the structural irregularities to be assumed in a crystal. Proc. Phys. Soc. 52, 23–33 (1940)

    work page 1940

  3. [3]

    Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter, vol

    Kleinert, H.: Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter. Gauge Fields in Condensed Matter, vol. v. 2. World Scientific, Singapore and Teaneck, N.J. (1989)

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    Mechanics of Elastic and Inelastic Solids, vol

    Mura, T.: Micromechanics of Defects in Solids. Mechanics of Elastic and Inelastic Solids, vol. v. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands ; Boston, Massachusetts (1987)

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Oxford University Press, USA (2002)

    Nye, J.F.: Physical Properties Of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Oxford University Press, USA (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (2020)

    Cantor, B.: The Equations of Materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Ultramicroscopy 74(3), 131–146 (1998)

    H¨ ytch, M.J., Snoeck, E., Kilaas, R.: Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from hrem micrographs. Ultramicroscopy 74(3), 131–146 (1998)

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    Wheeler, J., Mariani, E., Piazolo, S., Prior, D.J., Trimby, P., Drury, M.R.: The weighted burgers vector: a new quantity for constraining dislocation densities and types using electron backscatter diffraction on 2D sections through crystalline materials. J. Microscopy 233, 482–494 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Cloete J., T.E., F., H.: Computation of Burgers vectors from elastic strain and lattice rotation data. Proc. R. Soc. A. 478, 20210909 (2022) 20

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Kleman, M., Friedel, J.: Disclinations, dislocations, and continuous defects: A reappraisal. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 61–115 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Chaudhari, P., Levi, A., Steinhardt, P.: Edge and screw dislocations in an amorphous solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1517–1520 (1979)

    work page 1979

  12. [12]

    Zaccone, A.: Theory of Disordered Solids: From Atomistic Dynamics to Mechanical, Vibrational, and Thermal Properties vol. 1015. Springer, Cham (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Baggioli, M., Kriuchevskyi, I., Sirk, T.W., Zaccone, A.: Plasticity in amorphous solids is mediated by topological defects in the displacement field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 015501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Baggioli, M., Landry, M., Zaccone, A.: Deformations, relaxation, and broken symmetries in liquids, solids, and glasses: A unified topological field theory. Phys. Rev. E 105, 024602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Eshelby, J.D.: The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc. R. Soc. London A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 241, 376–396 (1957)

    work page 1957

  16. [16]

    Europhysics Letters 145(2), 26002 (2024)

    Kumar, A., Procaccia, I.: Elasticity, plasticity and screening in amorphous solids: A short review. Europhysics Letters 145(2), 26002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Lemaˆ ıtre, A., Mondal, C., Moshe, M., Procaccia, I., Roy, S., Screiber-Re’em, K.: Anomalous elasticity and plastic screening in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. E 104, 024904 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Asaro, R., Lubarda, V.: Mechanics of Solids and Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Desmarchelier, P., Fajardo, S., Falk, M.L.: Topological characterization of rearrangements in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. E 109, 053002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Nature Communications 14(1), 2955 (2023)

    Wu, Z.W., Chen, Y., Wang, W.-H., Kob, W., Xu, L.: Topology of vibrational modes predicts plastic events in glasses. Nature Communications 14(1), 2955 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    PNAS Nexus 3(9), 315 (2024)

    Bera, A., Baggioli, M., Petersen, T.C., Liu, A.C.Y., Zaccone, A.: Clustering of negative topological charges precedes plastic failure in 3D glasses. PNAS Nexus 3(9), 315 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06494 (2024) 21

    Vaibhav, V., Bera, A., Liu, A.C., Baggioli, M., Keim, P., Zaccone, A.: Experimental identification of topological defects in 2D colloidal glass. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06494 (2024) 21

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20631 (2024)

    Bera, A., Zaccone, A., Baggioli, M.: Hedgehog topological defects in 3D amorphous solids. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20631 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Nature Communications 14(1), 2956 (2023)

    Baggioli, M.: Topological defects reveal the plasticity of glasses. Nature Communications 14(1), 2956 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Journal of Statistical Physics 123, 415–453 (2006)

    Lemaˆ ıtre, A., Maloney, C.: Sum rules for the quasi-static and visco-elastic response of disordered solids at zero temperature. Journal of Statistical Physics 123, 415–453 (2006)

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Physical Review E 74(1), 016118 (2006)

    Maloney, C.E., Lemaitre, A.: Amorphous systems in athermal, quasistatic shear. Physical Review E 74(1), 016118 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Physical Review B 93(9), 094204 (2016)

    Milkus, R., Zaccone, A.: Local inversion-symmetry breaking controls the boson peak in glasses and crystals. Physical Review B 93(9), 094204 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Physical Review B 83(18), 184205 (2011)

    Zaccone, A., Scossa-Romano, E.: Approximate analytical description of the nonaffine response of amorphous solids. Physical Review B 83(18), 184205 (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Scientific reports 6(1), 18724 (2016)

    Schlegel, M., Brujic, J., Terentjev, E., Zaccone, A.: Local structure controls the nonaffine shear and bulk moduli of disordered solids. Scientific reports 6(1), 18724 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Journal of Physics: Materials 3(4), 044002 (2020)

    Bøjesen, E.D., Petersen, T.C., Martin, A.V., Weyland, M., Liu, A.C.Y.: Statistical measures of angu- lar correlations in amorphous materials from electron nano-diffraction in the scanning/transmission electron microscope. Journal of Physics: Materials 3(4), 044002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Science Advances 8(11), 0681 (2022)

    Liu, A.C.Y., Bojesen, E.D., Tabor, R.F., Mudie, S.T., Zaccone, A., Harrowell, P., Petersen, T.C.: Local symmetry predictors of mechanical stability in glasses. Science Advances 8(11), 0681 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Liu, A.C.Y., Neish, M.J., Stokol, G., Buckley, G.A., Smillie, L.A., Jonge, M.D., Ott, R.T., Kramer, M.J., Bourgeois, L.: Systematic mapping of icosahedral short-range order in a melt-spun Zr 36Cu64 metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 205505 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    Ding, T.C.P.J., Gammer, C., Ozdol, B., Ophus, C., Asta, M., Ritchie, R.O., Minor, A.M.: Direct measurement of nanostructural change during in situ deformation of a bulk metallic glass. Nat. Commun. 10, 2445 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Advances in Physics 58(5), 449–563 (2009) 22

    Bowick, M.J., Giomi, L.: Two-dimensional matter: order, curvature and defects. Advances in Physics 58(5), 449–563 (2009) 22

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Nature communications 7(1), 12385 (2016)

    Wei, X.-K., Jia, C.-L., Sluka, T., Wang, B.-X., Ye, Z.-G., Setter, N.: N´ eel-like domain walls in ferroelectric Pb (Zr, Ti) O 3 single crystals. Nature communications 7(1), 12385 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Acta Materialia 218, 117232 (2021)

    Xu, S., Pons, J., Santamarta, R., Karaman, I., Benafan, O., Noebe, R.D.: Strain glass state in Ni-rich Ni-Ti-Zr shape memory alloys. Acta Materialia 218, 117232 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Philosophical Magazine 90(1-4), 141–157 (2010)

    Ren, X., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., Fan, G., Otsuka, K., Suzuki, T., Ji, Y., Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Hou, S., Ding, X.: Strain glass in ferroelastic systems: Premartensitic tweed versus strain glass. Philosophical Magazine 90(1-4), 141–157 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Sarkar, S., Ren, X., Otsuka, K.: Evidence for strain glass in the ferroelastic-martensitic system Ti50−xNi50+x. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 205702 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    : Structural and topological nature of plasticity in sheared granular materials

    Cao, Y., Li, J., Kou, B., Xia, C., Li, Z., Chen, R., Xie, H., Xiao, T., Kob, W., Hong, L., et al. : Structural and topological nature of plasticity in sheared granular materials. Nature communications 9(1), 2911 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Tectonophysics 60(1), 89–105 (1979)

    Fry, N.: Random point distributions and strain measurement in rocks. Tectonophysics 60(1), 89–105 (1979)

    work page 1979

  41. [41]

    Cao, X., Nicolas, A., Trimcev, D., Rosso, A.: Soft modes and strain redistribution in continuous models of amorphous plasticity: the Eshelby paradigm, and beyond? Soft Matter 14, 3640–3651 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Hieronymus-Schmidt, V., R¨ osner, H., Wilde, G., Zaccone, A.: Shear banding in metallic glasses described by alignments of Eshelby quadrupoles. Phys. Rev. B 95, 134111 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Nature communications 10(1), 2445 (2019)

    Pekin, T.C., Ding, J., Gammer, C., Ozdol, B., Ophus, C., Asta, M., Ritchie, R.O., Minor, A.M.: Direct measurement of nanostructural change during in situ deformation of a bulk metallic glass. Nature communications 10(1), 2445 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Hentschel, H.G.E., Kumar, A., Procaccia, I., Roy, S.: The Eshelby problem in amorphous solids (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Physics Reports 560, 1–75 (2015)

    Royall, C.P., Williams, S.R.: The role of local structure in dynamical arrest. Physics Reports 560, 1–75 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Inverse Problems 31(4), 045005 23 (2015)

    Lionheart, W.R., Withers, P.J.: Diffraction tomography of strain. Inverse Problems 31(4), 045005 23 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Inverse Problems 37(1), 015003 (2020)

    Tovey, R., Johnstone, D.N., Collins, S.M., Lionheart, W.R., Midgley, P.A., Benning, M., Sch¨ onlieb, C.-B.: Scanning electron diffraction tomography of strain. Inverse Problems 37(1), 015003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Science 358(6366), 1033– 1037 (2017)

    Cubuk, E.D., Ivancic, R.J.S., Schoenholz, S.S., Strickland, D.J., Basu, A., Davidson, Z.S., Fontaine, J., Hor, J.L., Huang, Y.-R., Jiang, Y., Keim, N.C., Koshigan, K.D., Lefever, J.A., Liu, T., Ma, X.- G., Magagnosc, D.J., Morrow, E., Ortiz, C.P., Rieser, J.M., Shavit, A., Still, T., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Nordstrom, K.N., Arratia, P.E., Carpick, R.W., Durian...

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Grest, G.S., Kremer, K.: Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys. Rev. A 33, 3628–3631 (1986)

    work page 1986

  50. [50]

    Journal of Computational Physics 117(1), 1–19 (1995)

    Plimpton, S.: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 117(1), 1–19 (1995)

    work page 1995

  51. [51]

    Kriuchevskyi, I., Palyulin, V.V., Milkus, R., Elder, R.M., Sirk, T.W., Zaccone, A.: Scaling up the lattice dynamics of amorphous materials by orders of magnitude. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024108 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Sofroniew, N., Lambert, T., Evans, K., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Bokota, G., Winston, P., Pe˜ na-Castellanos, G., Yamauchi, K., Bussonnier, M., Doncila Pop, D., Can Solak, A., Liu, Z., Wadhwa, P., Burt, A., Buckley, G., Sweet, A., Migas, L., Hilsenstein, V., Gaifas, L., Bragantini, J., Rodr´ ıguez-Guerra, J., Mu˜ noz, H., Freeman, J., Boone, P., Lowe, A., Gohlk...

    work page

  53. [53]

    Liu, A.C.Y., Tabor, R.F., Jonge, M.D., Mudie, S.T., Petersen, T.C.: Favored local structures in amor- phous colloidal packings measured by microbeam x-ray diffraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(39), 10344–10349 (2017)

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    Liu, A.C.Y., Tabor, R.F., Bourgeois, L., Jonge, M.D., Mudie, S.T., Petersen, T.C.: Calculation of projected bond-orientational order parameters to quantify local symmetries from transmission diffraction data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Acta Cryst

    Liu, A.C.Y., Lumpkin, G.R., Petersen, T.C., Etheridge, J., Bourgeois, L.: Interpretation of angular 24 symmetries in electron nanodiffraction patterns from thin amorphous specimens. Acta Cryst. A 71, 473–482 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    J Microsc

    Villert, S., Maurice, C., Wyon, C., Fortunier, R.: Accuracy assessment of elastic strain measurement by ebsd. J Microsc. 233, 290–301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    before” and (B) “after

    Britton, T.B., Wilkinson, A.J.: High resolution electron backscatter diffraction measurements of elastic strain variations in the presence of larger lattice rotations. Ultramicroscopy114, 82–95 (2012) 25 Appendix A Extended data Fig. S.1 Stress-strain curve (pink lines) from the simulated glass from the range of strain values studied 0.00 ≤ γ ≤ 0.25. Gree...

    work page 2012