Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Field-level cosmological model selection: field-level simulation-based inference for Stage IV cosmic shear can distinguish dynamical dark energy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10616 v1 pith:GOH3N7R2 submitted 2024-10-14 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM

Field-level cosmological model selection: field-level simulation-based inference for Stage IV cosmic shear can distinguish dynamical dark energy

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
keywords darkenergymodelcomparisonfield-levelinferencecosmicdynamical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a framework that for the first time allows Bayesian model comparison to be performed for field-level inference of cosmological models. We achieve this by taking a simulation-based inference (SBI) approach using neural likelihood estimation, which we couple with the learned harmonic mean estimator in order to compute the Bayesian evidence for model comparison. We apply our framework to mock Stage IV cosmic shear observations to assess its effectiveness at distinguishing between various models of dark energy. If the recent DESI results that provided exciting hints of dynamical dark energy were indeed the true underlying model, our analysis shows Stage IV cosmic shear surveys could definitively detect dynamical dark energy. We also perform traditional power spectrum likelihood-based inference for comparison, which we find is not able to distinguish between dark energy models, highlighting the enhanced constraining power for model comparison of our field-level SBI approach.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantifying Weighted Morphological Content of Large-Scale Structures via Simulation-Based Inference

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulation-based inference on Big Sobol Sequence halos at z=0.5 shows CMD+MFs improves σ8 and Ωm precision by ~27% over MFs alone and outperforms PS by ~45% in mass-selected samples at matched scales.

  2. Increasing the sensitivity of full-shape galaxy clustering measurements in configuration-space with three-point statistics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Forecasts show that line-of-sight dependent 3PCF tightens sigma_8 constraints by a factor of 5 over 2PCF alone for Roman ELG and DESI LRG samples on scales <80 Mpc/h using AbacusSummit simulations.