Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15359 v1 pith:OW5EYNAN submitted 2024-10-20 cs.AI

A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models

classification cs.AI
keywords hallucinationlvlmslanguagelargemodelsvisualcorrectiongeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) enhances user interaction and enriches user experience by integrating visual modality on the basis of the Large Language Models (LLMs). It has demonstrated their powerful information processing and generation capabilities. However, the existence of hallucinations has limited the potential and practical effectiveness of LVLM in various fields. Although lots of work has been devoted to the issue of hallucination mitigation and correction, there are few reviews to summary this issue. In this survey, we first introduce the background of LVLMs and hallucinations. Then, the structure of LVLMs and main causes of hallucination generation are introduced. Further, we summary recent works on hallucination correction and mitigation. In addition, the available hallucination evaluation benchmarks for LVLMs are presented from judgmental and generative perspectives. Finally, we suggest some future research directions to enhance the dependability and utility of LVLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.