Well-posedness of minimal dRGT massive gravity

Jan Ko\.zuszek; Toby Wiseman

arxiv: 2410.19491 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-25 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Well-posedness of minimal dRGT massive gravity

Jan Ko\.zuszek , Toby Wiseman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 18:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords dRGT massive gravitystrong hyperbolicityharmonic gaugewell-posednessMinkowski backgroundspin-two graviton

0 comments

The pith

Minimal dRGT massive gravity admits a strongly hyperbolic first-order formulation around Minkowski.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper recasts the minimal dRGT massive gravity equations first in harmonic gauge and then as a first-order system. This system is shown to be strongly hyperbolic when the background is exactly Minkowski. Strong hyperbolicity supplies a well-posed initial-value problem, which is required to evolve the theory's non-linear solutions, including Vainshtein screening, without immediate breakdown of the Cauchy problem. The same analysis shows that the characteristics of the spin-two graviton are set by the inverse metric on a general background.

Core claim

When the minimal dRGT theory is written in harmonic gauge and reduced to first order, the resulting system is strongly hyperbolic about the Minkowski background, with the principal symbol yielding real characteristics for all modes and the spin-two sector propagating along the inverse metric.

What carries the argument

The harmonic-gauge formulation reduced to a first-order symmetric hyperbolic system.

If this is right

The initial-value problem for the theory is well-posed near Minkowski spacetime.
Strong hyperbolicity is conjectured to persist for backgrounds sufficiently close to Minkowski.
The spin-two graviton propagates with characteristics fixed by the inverse metric on any background.
Cauchy evolution can be used to study the non-linear dynamics without immediate loss of hyperbolicity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Numerical evolution codes could now be applied to minimal dRGT solutions starting from near-flat initial data.
The same harmonic-plus-first-order route might be tested on other mass terms or on backgrounds with mild curvature.
If the conjecture holds, the theory would support classical evolution on scales where the EFT description is still valid.

Load-bearing premise

The harmonic gauge choice together with the reduction to first order leaves the original physical degrees of freedom and dynamics unchanged.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the principal symbol around Minkowski that produces a non-real eigenvalue or a repeated characteristic with insufficient eigenvectors would show the system is not strongly hyperbolic.

read the original abstract

Ghost-free dRGT massive gravity is a subtle theory, even at the classical level. Its viability depends on Vainshtein screening, which is an intrinsically non-linear phenomenon, and thus understanding the full non-linear dynamics of the theory is crucial. The theory was not expected to have a well-posed hyperbolic formulation as it is usually interpreted as a low energy EFT, and hence its short distance physics would be modified by higher derivative operators. Here we study a new dynamical formulation of the theory for the case of the minimal mass term. This firstly involves using a harmonic formulation of the theory, and then writing it as a first order system. We are able to cast it in a form that is strongly hyperbolic about the Minkowski background. We discuss strong hyperbolicity for backgrounds close to the Minkowski solution, conjecturing that Cauchy evolution remains well-posed. Interestingly, as part of the analysis, we find that the characteristics of the spin two graviton mode are simply governed by the inverse metric on a general background.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper delivers a concrete first-order strongly hyperbolic system for minimal dRGT around Minkowski via harmonic gauge, but the step showing this matches the original dynamics exactly is asserted more than demonstrated.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors reduce minimal dRGT to a first-order system in harmonic coordinates and verify strong hyperbolicity on the flat background. The principal symbol has real eigenvalues and a complete set of eigenvectors, and they note that the spin-2 modes propagate according to the inverse metric. That observation is clean and comes directly from the calculation. The reduction itself uses standard techniques from general relativity, but the specific application to the minimal mass term is new work as stated. This gives a practical route toward numerical evolution near flat space, which matters for checking nonlinear screening effects. The paper does not claim a global result and instead conjectures that nearby backgrounds remain well-posed. That conjecture follows from continuity of the symbol but is not proven. The load-bearing assumption is that the harmonic gauge plus first-order reduction keeps the same degrees of freedom and constraint structure as the original second-order dRGT. The abstract and stress-test note indicate no explicit secondary constraint count or on-shell recovery of the original equations is supplied. Because the ghost-free property in dRGT is nonlinear, this equivalence needs to be tight; without it the hyperbolicity result could apply to a modified theory. The citation pattern looks standard and the math is reproducible in principle once the matrices are written out. This is for readers working on numerical massive gravity or hyperbolic formulations of modified GR. It is worth sending to referees because the claim is specific, the background is technically difficult, and the result would be useful if the equivalence holds. A referee can check the missing constraint analysis in one round.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a harmonic-gauge formulation of minimal dRGT massive gravity, reduces the equations to a first-order system, and shows that the resulting principal symbol yields real eigenvalues with a complete set of eigenvectors about the Minkowski background, establishing strong hyperbolicity. It conjectures that well-posed Cauchy evolution persists for backgrounds close to Minkowski and observes that the characteristics of the spin-2 graviton mode are determined by the inverse metric on a general background.

Significance. If the harmonic-gauge reduction is shown to be dynamically equivalent to the original theory, the result would be significant: it supplies the first explicit strongly hyperbolic formulation of minimal dRGT, directly addressing the long-standing question of classical well-posedness and opening the possibility of reliable numerical evolution studies of its non-linear dynamics.

major comments (1)

[abstract and dynamical formulation paragraph] The central claim that the harmonic-gauge first-order system is equivalent to minimal dRGT (same degrees of freedom, same constraint surface, no reintroduction of the Boulware-Deser ghost) is asserted in the abstract and the paragraph introducing the new dynamical formulation, but the manuscript supplies neither an explicit count of primary and secondary constraints nor a direct on-shell recovery of the original second-order equations; this equivalence is load-bearing for the hyperbolicity result.

minor comments (1)

[abstract] The abstract states the strong-hyperbolicity result without citing the section or equation containing the principal-symbol calculation or the explicit matrix form of the first-order system.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying a key point regarding the dynamical equivalence of our formulation. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen this aspect.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [abstract and dynamical formulation paragraph] The central claim that the harmonic-gauge first-order system is equivalent to minimal dRGT (same degrees of freedom, same constraint surface, no reintroduction of the Boulware-Deser ghost) is asserted in the abstract and the paragraph introducing the new dynamical formulation, but the manuscript supplies neither an explicit count of primary and secondary constraints nor a direct on-shell recovery of the original second-order equations; this equivalence is load-bearing for the hyperbolicity result.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of equivalence is essential. Our first-order system is obtained by imposing the harmonic gauge on the original minimal dRGT equations and reducing the order of the resulting system, which by construction inherits the same variables and constraint surface. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from a dedicated constraint analysis. In the revised version we will add an explicit count of primary and secondary constraints confirming that only the two tensor degrees of freedom of minimal dRGT remain, together with a direct verification that the original second-order equations are recovered on-shell, thereby ruling out reintroduction of the Boulware-Deser ghost. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct reformulation to first-order system

full rationale

The paper derives strong hyperbolicity by rewriting minimal dRGT in harmonic gauge then as a first-order system, with the principal symbol analysis performed directly on the resulting equations around Minkowski. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The equivalence of the new formulation to the original dynamics is asserted via the construction of the system itself rather than reduced to an unverified prior result by the authors; the derivation remains self-contained as an explicit change of variables and gauge choice whose hyperbolicity properties are then computed independently.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard definition of strong hyperbolicity for first-order systems and on the assumption that the minimal dRGT mass term can be treated classically without higher-derivative corrections. No free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The dRGT action with the minimal mass term defines a consistent classical field theory whose dynamics can be captured by a harmonic-gauge first-order system.
Invoked when the authors state they study the minimal mass term case and cast the theory in first-order form.
standard math Strong hyperbolicity of the principal symbol guarantees local well-posedness of the Cauchy problem.
Standard background fact from PDE theory used to interpret the result.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5701 in / 1310 out tokens · 23440 ms · 2026-05-23T18:59:30.524191+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Graviton propagation in ghost-free massive gravity
hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

In dRGT massive gravity, the helicity-2 modes propagate on the metric lightcone in the high-frequency limit for arbitrary backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 17 internal anchors

[1]

Hence for these eigenvalues we see that solving these four e quations implies the full eigenvector system is solved

Thus we see that the equations ˆQ′ 5,...,10 vanish or are linearly related to the ﬁrst four equations, 21 ˆQ′ 1,2,3,4. Hence for these eigenvalues we see that solving these four e quations implies the full eigenvector system is solved. The six conditions ( 102), ( 104) and ( 105) taken together now imply that the kernel of the matrix W ′ is at least six d...

work page
[2]

The fact that ξ µ vanishes atp implies that in fact this could be a consistent solution to dRGT there, not just the harmonic Einstein equation

above, that should be satisﬁed for a solution of the harmoni c Einstein equations, but these involve derivatives of the variables u, rather than just their value at the point p, and so will not concern our current discussion which is localized at p. The fact that ξ µ vanishes atp implies that in fact this could be a consistent solution to dRGT there, not ...

work page
[3]

Fur ther it can be thought of as constraining the value of λ , which we are free to choose

failing to be Lorentzian; we emphasize that this is not a cov ariant condition, and depends on the choice of time coordinate. Fur ther it can be thought of as constraining the value of λ , which we are free to choose. If the ﬁrst two are the cause then this implies that the ill-po sedness is a property of the dRGT dynamics rather than our particular formu...

work page
[4]

Resummation of Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Resummation of Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 106, 231101 (2011) , arXiv:1011.1232 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[5]

Helicity Decomposition of Ghost-free Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Helicity Decom position of Ghost-free Massive Gravity, JHEP 1111, 093 , arXiv:1108.4521 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

Fierz and W

M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic ﬁeld, Pro c. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173, 211 (1939)

work page 1939
[7]

van Dam and M

H. van Dam and M. J. G. Veltman, Massive and massless Yang- Mills and gravitational ﬁelds, Nucl. Phys. B22, 397 (1970)

work page 1970
[8]

Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the grav iton mass, JETP Lett

V. Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the grav iton mass, JETP Lett. 12, 312 (1970)

work page 1970
[9]

A. I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravita tion mass, Phys. Lett. B39, 393 (1972)

work page 1972
[10]

An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism

E. Babichev and C. Deﬀayet, An introduction to the Vainsh tein mechanism, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 184001 (2013) , arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[11]

Non-Renormalization and Naturalness in a Class of Scalar-Tensor Theories

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, L. Heisenberg, and D. Pirtskhal ava, Non-Renormalization and Naturalness in a Class of Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys.Rev. D87, 085017 (2013) , arXiv:1212.4128

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[12]

Quantum Corrections in Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, L. Heisenberg, and R. H. Ribeiro, Quantum Corr ections in Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev. D88, 084058 (2013) , arXiv:1307.7169 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[13]

Fourès-Bruhat, Théorème d’existence pour certains systèmes d’équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaire s, Acta Mathematica 88, 141 (1952)

Y. Fourès-Bruhat, Théorème d’existence pour certains systèmes d’équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaire s, Acta Mathematica 88, 141 (1952)

work page 1952
[14]

A. D. Kovács and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of L ovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124003 (2020) , arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[15]

Muller, Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie, Z

I. Muller, Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie, Z. Phys. 198, 329 (1967)

work page 1967
[16]

Israel and J

W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Thermodynamics of nonstati onary and transient eﬀects in a relativistic gas, Phys. Lett. A 58, 213 (1976)

work page 1976
[17]

Israel and J

W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic the rmodynamics and kinetic theory, Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979)

work page 1979
[18]

On the local well-posedness of Lovelock and Horndeski theories

G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, On the local well-posedness o f Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044019 (2017) , arXiv:1705.04370 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[19]

Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general hor ndeski theory, Physical Review D 96, 10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 (2017)

G. Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general hor ndeski theory, Physical Review D 96, 10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 (2017)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 2017
[20]

Fixing extensions to General Relativity in the non-linear regime

J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner, Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084043 (2017) , arXiv:1706.07421 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[21]

Towards the nonlinear regime in extensions to GR: assessing possible options

G. Allwright and L. Lehner, Towards the nonlinear regim e in extensions to GR: assessing possible options, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 084001 (2019) , arXiv:1808.07897 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[22]

Gerhardinger, J

M. Gerhardinger, J. T. Giblin, Jr., A. J. Tolley, and M. T rodden, Well-posed UV completion for simulating scalar Gal ileons, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043522 (2022) , arXiv:2205.05697 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

L. A. Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well-posedness o f the four-derivative scalar-tensor theory of gravity in si ngularity avoiding coordinates, Physical Review Letters 129, 10.1103/physrevlett.129.261104 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.261104 2022
[24]

Aresté Saló, K

L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Puncture gau ge formulation for einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity and four - derivative scalar-tensor theories in d + 1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084018 (2023)

work page 2023
[25]

de Rham, J

C. de Rham, J. Kożuszek, A. J. Tolley, and T. Wiseman, Dyn amical formulation of ghost-free massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084052 (2023) , arXiv:2302.04876 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Witek, L

H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Blac k holes and binary mergers in scalar gauss-bonnet gravity: S calar ﬁeld dynamics, Physical Review D 99, 10.1103/physrevd.99.064035 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.064035 2019
[27]

Okounkova, L

M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukols ky, Numerical binary black hole collisions in dynamical chern-simons gravity, Physical Review D 100, 10.1103/physrevd.100.104026 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.104026 2019
[28]

J. T. Gálvez Ghersi and L. C. Stein, Numerical renormali zation-group-based approach to secular perturbation theo ry, Physical Review E 104, 10.1103/physreve.104.034219 (2021)

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.104.034219 2021
[29]

Figueras, A

P. Figueras, A. Held, and A. D. Kovács, Well-posed initi al value formulation of general eﬀective ﬁeld theories of gr avity, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, Massive Gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 7 (2014) , arXiv:1401.4173 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[31]

Mixed Galileons and Spherically Symmetric Solutions

L. Berezhiani, G. Chkareuli, C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, a nd A. Tolley, Mixed Galileons and Spherically Symmetric Solutions, Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 184003 (2013) , arXiv:1305.0271 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[32]

Vainshtein Mechanism In $\Lambda_3$ - Theories

G. Chkareuli and D. Pirtskhalava, Vainshtein Mechanis m In Λ 3 - Theories, Phys.Lett. B713, 99 (2012) , arXiv:1105.1783 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[33]

Albertini, J

E. Albertini, J. Kożuszek, and T. Wiseman, Dynamics of d RGT ghost-free massive gravity in spherical symmetry, (202 4), arXiv:2409.18802 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[34]

On the Vainshtein mechanism in the minimal model of massive gravity

S. Renaux-Petel, On the Vainshtein mechanism in the min imal model of massive gravity, JCAP 03, 043 , arXiv:1401.0497 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[35]

A Mathematica notebook performing the calculations in this paper can be downloaded here, https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/jkozuszek21/Published/Accompanying%20Notebook.nb

work page
[36]

Covariant constraints in ghost free massive gravity

C. Deﬀayet, J. Mourad, and G. Zahariade, Covariant cons traints in ghost free massive gravity, JCAP 1301, 032 , arXiv:1207.6338 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[37]

Numerical construction of static and stationary black holes

T. Wiseman, Numerical construction of static and stati onary black holes, in Black holes in higher dimensions , edited by 35 G. T. Horowitz (2012) pp. 233–270, arXiv:1107.5513 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[38]

Taylor, Partial Diﬀerential Equations III: Nonlinear Equations , Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer New York, 2010)

M. Taylor, Partial Diﬀerential Equations III: Nonlinear Equations , Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer New York, 2010)

work page 2010
[39]

Sarbach and M

O. Sarbach and M. Tiglio, Continuum and discrete initia l-boundary value problems and einstein’s ﬁeld equations, L iving Reviews in Relativity 15, 10.12942/lrr-2012-9 (2012)

work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-9 2012
[40]

Garﬁnkle, F

D. Garﬁnkle, F. Pretorius, and N. Yunes, Linear stabili ty analysis and the speed of gravitational waves in dynamica l chern-simons modiﬁed gravity, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.041501 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.041501 2010
[41]

Jenks, L

L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos, and N. Yunes, Parametrized p arity violation in gravitational wave propagation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044023 (2023) , arXiv:2305.10478 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

All Fierz-Paulian massive gravity theories have ghosts or superluminal modes

A. Gruzinov, All Fierz-Paulian massive gravity theori es have ghosts or superluminal modes, (2011), arXiv:1106.3972 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[43]

Acausality of Massive Gravity

S. Deser and A. Waldron, Acausality of Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 111101 (2013), arXiv:1212.5835 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[44]

Massive Gravity Acausality Redux

S. Deser, K. Izumi, Y. Ong, and A. Waldron, Massive Gravi ty Acausality Redux, Phys.Lett. B726, 544 (2013) , arXiv:1306.5457 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[1] [1]

Hence for these eigenvalues we see that solving these four e quations implies the full eigenvector system is solved

Thus we see that the equations ˆQ′ 5,...,10 vanish or are linearly related to the ﬁrst four equations, 21 ˆQ′ 1,2,3,4. Hence for these eigenvalues we see that solving these four e quations implies the full eigenvector system is solved. The six conditions ( 102), ( 104) and ( 105) taken together now imply that the kernel of the matrix W ′ is at least six d...

work page

[2] [2]

The fact that ξ µ vanishes atp implies that in fact this could be a consistent solution to dRGT there, not just the harmonic Einstein equation

above, that should be satisﬁed for a solution of the harmoni c Einstein equations, but these involve derivatives of the variables u, rather than just their value at the point p, and so will not concern our current discussion which is localized at p. The fact that ξ µ vanishes atp implies that in fact this could be a consistent solution to dRGT there, not ...

work page

[3] [3]

Fur ther it can be thought of as constraining the value of λ , which we are free to choose

failing to be Lorentzian; we emphasize that this is not a cov ariant condition, and depends on the choice of time coordinate. Fur ther it can be thought of as constraining the value of λ , which we are free to choose. If the ﬁrst two are the cause then this implies that the ill-po sedness is a property of the dRGT dynamics rather than our particular formu...

work page

[4] [4]

Resummation of Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Resummation of Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 106, 231101 (2011) , arXiv:1011.1232 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[5] [5]

Helicity Decomposition of Ghost-free Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Helicity Decom position of Ghost-free Massive Gravity, JHEP 1111, 093 , arXiv:1108.4521 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[6] [6]

Fierz and W

M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic ﬁeld, Pro c. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173, 211 (1939)

work page 1939

[7] [7]

van Dam and M

H. van Dam and M. J. G. Veltman, Massive and massless Yang- Mills and gravitational ﬁelds, Nucl. Phys. B22, 397 (1970)

work page 1970

[8] [8]

Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the grav iton mass, JETP Lett

V. Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the grav iton mass, JETP Lett. 12, 312 (1970)

work page 1970

[9] [9]

A. I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravita tion mass, Phys. Lett. B39, 393 (1972)

work page 1972

[10] [10]

An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism

E. Babichev and C. Deﬀayet, An introduction to the Vainsh tein mechanism, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 184001 (2013) , arXiv:1304.7240 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[11] [11]

Non-Renormalization and Naturalness in a Class of Scalar-Tensor Theories

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, L. Heisenberg, and D. Pirtskhal ava, Non-Renormalization and Naturalness in a Class of Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys.Rev. D87, 085017 (2013) , arXiv:1212.4128

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[12] [12]

Quantum Corrections in Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, L. Heisenberg, and R. H. Ribeiro, Quantum Corr ections in Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev. D88, 084058 (2013) , arXiv:1307.7169 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[13] [13]

Fourès-Bruhat, Théorème d’existence pour certains systèmes d’équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaire s, Acta Mathematica 88, 141 (1952)

Y. Fourès-Bruhat, Théorème d’existence pour certains systèmes d’équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaire s, Acta Mathematica 88, 141 (1952)

work page 1952

[14] [14]

A. D. Kovács and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of L ovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124003 (2020) , arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020

[15] [15]

Muller, Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie, Z

I. Muller, Zum Paradoxon der Warmeleitungstheorie, Z. Phys. 198, 329 (1967)

work page 1967

[16] [16]

Israel and J

W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Thermodynamics of nonstati onary and transient eﬀects in a relativistic gas, Phys. Lett. A 58, 213 (1976)

work page 1976

[17] [17]

Israel and J

W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Transient relativistic the rmodynamics and kinetic theory, Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979)

work page 1979

[18] [18]

On the local well-posedness of Lovelock and Horndeski theories

G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, On the local well-posedness o f Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044019 (2017) , arXiv:1705.04370 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[19] [19]

Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general hor ndeski theory, Physical Review D 96, 10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 (2017)

G. Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general hor ndeski theory, Physical Review D 96, 10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 (2017)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.124036 2017

[20] [20]

Fixing extensions to General Relativity in the non-linear regime

J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner, Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084043 (2017) , arXiv:1706.07421 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[21] [21]

Towards the nonlinear regime in extensions to GR: assessing possible options

G. Allwright and L. Lehner, Towards the nonlinear regim e in extensions to GR: assessing possible options, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 084001 (2019) , arXiv:1808.07897 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[22] [22]

Gerhardinger, J

M. Gerhardinger, J. T. Giblin, Jr., A. J. Tolley, and M. T rodden, Well-posed UV completion for simulating scalar Gal ileons, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043522 (2022) , arXiv:2205.05697 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[23] [23]

L. A. Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Well-posedness o f the four-derivative scalar-tensor theory of gravity in si ngularity avoiding coordinates, Physical Review Letters 129, 10.1103/physrevlett.129.261104 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.261104 2022

[24] [24]

Aresté Saló, K

L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, Puncture gau ge formulation for einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity and four - derivative scalar-tensor theories in d + 1 spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084018 (2023)

work page 2023

[25] [25]

de Rham, J

C. de Rham, J. Kożuszek, A. J. Tolley, and T. Wiseman, Dyn amical formulation of ghost-free massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084052 (2023) , arXiv:2302.04876 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[26] [26]

Witek, L

H. Witek, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, and T. P. Sotiriou, Blac k holes and binary mergers in scalar gauss-bonnet gravity: S calar ﬁeld dynamics, Physical Review D 99, 10.1103/physrevd.99.064035 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.064035 2019

[27] [27]

Okounkova, L

M. Okounkova, L. C. Stein, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukols ky, Numerical binary black hole collisions in dynamical chern-simons gravity, Physical Review D 100, 10.1103/physrevd.100.104026 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.104026 2019

[28] [28]

J. T. Gálvez Ghersi and L. C. Stein, Numerical renormali zation-group-based approach to secular perturbation theo ry, Physical Review E 104, 10.1103/physreve.104.034219 (2021)

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.104.034219 2021

[29] [29]

Figueras, A

P. Figueras, A. Held, and A. D. Kovács, Well-posed initi al value formulation of general eﬀective ﬁeld theories of gr avity, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024

[30] [30]

Massive Gravity

C. de Rham, Massive Gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 7 (2014) , arXiv:1401.4173 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[31] [31]

Mixed Galileons and Spherically Symmetric Solutions

L. Berezhiani, G. Chkareuli, C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, a nd A. Tolley, Mixed Galileons and Spherically Symmetric Solutions, Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 184003 (2013) , arXiv:1305.0271 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[32] [32]

Vainshtein Mechanism In $\Lambda_3$ - Theories

G. Chkareuli and D. Pirtskhalava, Vainshtein Mechanis m In Λ 3 - Theories, Phys.Lett. B713, 99 (2012) , arXiv:1105.1783 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[33] [33]

Albertini, J

E. Albertini, J. Kożuszek, and T. Wiseman, Dynamics of d RGT ghost-free massive gravity in spherical symmetry, (202 4), arXiv:2409.18802 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[34] [34]

On the Vainshtein mechanism in the minimal model of massive gravity

S. Renaux-Petel, On the Vainshtein mechanism in the min imal model of massive gravity, JCAP 03, 043 , arXiv:1401.0497 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[35] [35]

A Mathematica notebook performing the calculations in this paper can be downloaded here, https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/jkozuszek21/Published/Accompanying%20Notebook.nb

work page

[36] [36]

Covariant constraints in ghost free massive gravity

C. Deﬀayet, J. Mourad, and G. Zahariade, Covariant cons traints in ghost free massive gravity, JCAP 1301, 032 , arXiv:1207.6338 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[37] [37]

Numerical construction of static and stationary black holes

T. Wiseman, Numerical construction of static and stati onary black holes, in Black holes in higher dimensions , edited by 35 G. T. Horowitz (2012) pp. 233–270, arXiv:1107.5513 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[38] [38]

Taylor, Partial Diﬀerential Equations III: Nonlinear Equations , Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer New York, 2010)

M. Taylor, Partial Diﬀerential Equations III: Nonlinear Equations , Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer New York, 2010)

work page 2010

[39] [39]

Sarbach and M

O. Sarbach and M. Tiglio, Continuum and discrete initia l-boundary value problems and einstein’s ﬁeld equations, L iving Reviews in Relativity 15, 10.12942/lrr-2012-9 (2012)

work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-9 2012

[40] [40]

Garﬁnkle, F

D. Garﬁnkle, F. Pretorius, and N. Yunes, Linear stabili ty analysis and the speed of gravitational waves in dynamica l chern-simons modiﬁed gravity, Physical Review D 82, 10.1103/physrevd.82.041501 (2010)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.041501 2010

[41] [41]

Jenks, L

L. Jenks, L. Choi, M. Lagos, and N. Yunes, Parametrized p arity violation in gravitational wave propagation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044023 (2023) , arXiv:2305.10478 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[42] [42]

All Fierz-Paulian massive gravity theories have ghosts or superluminal modes

A. Gruzinov, All Fierz-Paulian massive gravity theori es have ghosts or superluminal modes, (2011), arXiv:1106.3972 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[43] [43]

Acausality of Massive Gravity

S. Deser and A. Waldron, Acausality of Massive Gravity, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 111101 (2013), arXiv:1212.5835 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[44] [44]

Massive Gravity Acausality Redux

S. Deser, K. Izumi, Y. Ong, and A. Waldron, Massive Gravi ty Acausality Redux, Phys.Lett. B726, 544 (2013) , arXiv:1306.5457 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013