Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Autoregressive Models in Vision: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.05902 v2 pith:DL7TW56R submitted 2024-11-08 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords modelsautoregressivevisiongenerationcomputerdiverseincludingrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autoregressive modeling has been a huge success in the field of natural language processing (NLP). Recently, autoregressive models have emerged as a significant area of focus in computer vision, where they excel in producing high-quality visual content. Autoregressive models in NLP typically operate on subword tokens. However, the representation strategy in computer vision can vary in different levels, i.e., pixel-level, token-level, or scale-level, reflecting the diverse and hierarchical nature of visual data compared to the sequential structure of language. This survey comprehensively examines the literature on autoregressive models applied to vision. To improve readability for researchers from diverse research backgrounds, we start with preliminary sequence representation and modeling in vision. Next, we divide the fundamental frameworks of visual autoregressive models into three general sub-categories, including pixel-based, token-based, and scale-based models based on the representation strategy. We then explore the interconnections between autoregressive models and other generative models. Furthermore, we present a multifaceted categorization of autoregressive models in computer vision, including image generation, video generation, 3D generation, and multimodal generation. We also elaborate on their applications in diverse domains, including emerging domains such as embodied AI and 3D medical AI, with about 250 related references. Finally, we highlight the current challenges to autoregressive models in vision with suggestions about potential research directions. We have also set up a Github repository to organize the papers included in this survey at: https://github.com/ChaofanTao/Autoregressive-Models-in-Vision-Survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Unified Low-level Foundation Model for Enhancing Pathology Image Quality

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A prompt-guided diffusion model pretrained on 190 million pathology patches outperforms task-specific models across most restoration and virtual staining benchmarks.

  2. A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that catalogs and categorizes training-free LLM alignment methods into pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding, with a limited experimental comparison on one model.

  3. A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes vision-language-action models for autonomous driving into four stages, compares over 20 systems, and catalogs datasets, benchmarks, and open challenges.

  4. Multimodal Generative AI with Autoregressive LLMs for Human Motion Understanding and Generation: A Way Forward

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey paper reviews multimodal generative AI and autoregressive LLMs for text-driven human motion generation, with comparative tables of models, datasets, and metrics.

Pith tools