pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.08154 · v3 · submitted 2024-11-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Fast Sampling of Protein Conformational Dynamics

Michael A. Sauer , Souvik Mondal , Brandon Neff , Sthitadhi Maiti , Matthias Heyden This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords protein conformational dynamicscollective variablesenhanced samplinglow-frequency vibrationsmolecular dynamicsfree energy surfacesconformational ensembles
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified low-frequency vibration analysis supplies collective variables that accelerate sampling of protein conformational transitions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that low-frequency vibrations can be isolated accurately in proteins and used as collective variables to speed up molecular dynamics simulations of slow conformational changes. Standard approaches to identifying these vibrations relied on approximations that break down at low frequencies, limiting their usefulness for enhanced sampling. If the modification works, it produces reproducible collective variables that let researchers map free energy surfaces and generate conformational ensembles on timescales short enough for routine high-throughput use. Protein function often depends on these dynamical transitions rather than static structures alone, so faster sampling addresses a key gap between structure prediction and functional understanding.

Core claim

The authors modify a recently introduced vibration analysis that remains accurate at low frequencies, apply it to five proteins of varying complexity, and obtain collective variables that reproducibly enhance sampling of conformational transitions and associated free energy surfaces on timescales compatible with high-throughput applications, thereby enabling efficient generation of protein conformational ensembles.

What carries the argument

The modified vibration analysis that isolates low-frequency modes without low-frequency approximations, used to define collective variables for enhanced sampling in molecular dynamics.

If this is right

  • Collective variables from the analysis remain reproducible across independent runs and different proteins.
  • Enhanced sampling with these variables produces converged free energy surfaces on timescales suitable for high-throughput work.
  • The approach works across proteins of varying size and complexity.
  • Conformational ensembles can be generated efficiently enough to support downstream prediction tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Conformational ensembles produced this way could supply training data for models that predict dynamics in addition to static structures.
  • The same vibration-based collective variables might be tested on other biomolecules such as nucleic acids or protein complexes.
  • Integration into existing simulation workflows could allow routine use without custom code for each new protein.

Load-bearing premise

The modification to the vibration analysis keeps it accurate at low frequencies even though standard approximations are invalid there.

What would settle it

Applying the derived collective variables in enhanced sampling runs on any of the five tested proteins and finding no consistent reduction in the time needed to converge the same free energy surface relative to standard methods or other collective variables.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08154 by Brandon Neff, Matthias Heyden, Michael A. Sauer, Souvik Mondal, Sthitadhi Maiti.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Visualization of anharmonic low-frequency vibra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Box and whisker plots for each system illustrate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Free energy surfaces and statistical errors obtained from 20 replica simulations for each system. (A) FESs as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Protein function does not solely depend on structure but often relies on dynamical transitions between distinct conformations. Despite this fact, our ability to characterize or predict protein dynamics is substantially less developed compared to state-of-the-art protein structure prediction. Molecular simulations provide unique opportunities to study protein dynamics, but the timescales associated with conformational changes generate substantial challenges. Enhanced sampling algorithms with collective variables can greatly reduce the computational cost of sampling slow processes. However, defining collective variables suitable to enhance sampling of protein conformational transitions is non-trivial. Low-frequency vibrations have long been considered as promising candidates for collective variable but their identification so far relied on assumptions inherently invalid at low frequencies. We recently introduced an analysis of molecular vibrations that does not rely on such approximations and remains accurate at low frequencies. Here, we modified this approach to efficiently isolate low-frequency vibrations in proteins and applied it to a set of five proteins of varying complexity. We demonstrate that our approach is not only highly reproducible but results in collective variables that consistently enhance sampling of protein conformational transitions and associated free energy surfaces on timescales compatible with high throughput applications. This enables the efficient generation of protein conformational ensembles, which will be key for future prediction algorithms aiming beyond static protein structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to modify a recently introduced vibration analysis (accurate at low frequencies without invalid approximations) to isolate collective variables (CVs) from low-frequency modes in proteins. Applied to five proteins of varying complexity, the method is reported to be highly reproducible and to consistently enhance sampling of conformational transitions and associated free energy surfaces on timescales compatible with high-throughput applications, enabling efficient generation of conformational ensembles.

Significance. If the modified analysis is shown to remain accurate at low frequencies and the resulting CVs demonstrably improve sampling over baselines, the work would offer a general, computationally efficient route to protein conformational ensembles. This addresses a recognized gap between static structure prediction and dynamics, with potential impact on downstream prediction algorithms. The reproducibility emphasis is a positive feature if backed by quantitative metrics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Methods description of modified analysis] The central claim rests on the modified vibration analysis remaining accurate in the low-frequency regime relevant to conformational transitions (abstract, paragraph on prior limitations). No specific validation, error metrics, or comparison to exact low-frequency calculations is described to confirm this accuracy, which is load-bearing for the assertion that the CVs enhance sampling.
  2. [Results section on application to five proteins] The results on five proteins assert 'consistent' enhancement and 'highly reproducible' outcomes, yet the abstract (and if absent from full text) provides no quantitative results, error analysis, baseline comparisons, or details on how reproducibility was measured. This leaves the enhancement claim unsupported by the data presented.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Add a dedicated subsection detailing the exact modifications to the vibration analysis (e.g., algorithmic changes, implementation) to allow independent reproduction.
  2. [Figures] Ensure all figures include clear labels for the proteins studied, the CVs used, and quantitative sampling metrics (e.g., transition rates or free-energy convergence).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments. We agree that additional quantitative validation and metrics would improve the clarity of the claims and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods description of modified analysis] The central claim rests on the modified vibration analysis remaining accurate in the low-frequency regime relevant to conformational transitions (abstract, paragraph on prior limitations). No specific validation, error metrics, or comparison to exact low-frequency calculations is described to confirm this accuracy, which is load-bearing for the assertion that the CVs enhance sampling.

    Authors: The modification builds directly on our previously validated low-frequency vibration analysis. However, we acknowledge that the current manuscript does not include new explicit error metrics for the modified version in the low-frequency regime. We will add a validation subsection in the Methods or Results, including comparisons to exact calculations on small systems and error metrics, to support the accuracy claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on application to five proteins] The results on five proteins assert 'consistent' enhancement and 'highly reproducible' outcomes, yet the abstract (and if absent from full text) provides no quantitative results, error analysis, baseline comparisons, or details on how reproducibility was measured. This leaves the enhancement claim unsupported by the data presented.

    Authors: The full text includes detailed results with figures demonstrating the sampling enhancement for each of the five proteins, including free energy surfaces and transition sampling compared to unbiased simulations. Reproducibility was assessed via multiple independent runs. To make this more explicit, we will update the abstract with key quantitative metrics (e.g., speedup factors, RMSD values) and add a paragraph in Results detailing the error analysis and reproducibility protocol with standard deviations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior vibration analysis; central claims independent

full rationale

The abstract references the authors' recent introduction of a low-frequency vibration analysis as the foundation for the current modification and application to five proteins. This is a minor self-citation that is not load-bearing, as the reported enhancement of conformational sampling and free energy surfaces is positioned as an empirical demonstration rather than a direct consequence of the prior result alone. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggling patterns appear in the derivation chain described.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based solely on abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Low-frequency vibrations identified without low-frequency-invalid approximations can serve as effective collective variables for conformational sampling
    Implicit in the abstract's framing of the method's promise and results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5749 in / 1200 out tokens · 40165 ms · 2026-05-23T17:32:15.581016+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. High-Throughput Computation of Anharmonic Low-Frequency Protein Vibrations

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Coarse-graining all-atom MD trajectories enables efficient FRESEAN mode analysis to extract anharmonic low-frequency protein vibrations at minimal computational cost.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A matrix of mass-weighted time velocity cross correla- tion functions was computed for all coarse-grained de- grees of freedom with a maximum correlation time of 2 ps

    rotated into a reference coordinate system based on the crystal structure; and 2) coarse-grained into beads (1 bead for glycines, two beads for each other amino acid). A matrix of mass-weighted time velocity cross correla- tion functions was computed for all coarse-grained de- grees of freedom with a maximum correlation time of 2 ps. We time-symmetrized e...

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    [44-45,51-52] radius of gyration radius of gyration computed with all protein atoms HIV-1 Pr flap distance distance between C α-atoms of G51 in each monomer flap RMSD RMSD of residues I50-G52 in both monomers MCL-1 S255-T226 distance between C α-atoms of residues S225 and T226 interdomain angle angle between C α-atoms of residues S225, D241, T226 RBP twis...

    work page

  3. [3]

    [99-100,236-237,258-259]

    work page

  4. [4]

    [108-109,230-231,269-270],

    work page

  5. [5]

    [108-231,269-271] hinge angle angle between COMs of 3 groups of residues:

    work page

  6. [6]

    [101-107,232-235,260-268]

    work page

  7. [7]

    Closed" and

    [108-231,269-271] KRAS G12-T35 distance between C α-atoms of residues G12 and T35 T35-G60 distance between C α-atoms of residues T35 and G60 TABLE S2. Geometric Variables for Analysis FIG. S10. Visualization of geometric collective variables (distances and angles shown as colored cylinders with spherical end points) used for the analysis of enhanced sampl...

    work page

  8. [8]

    A. W. Senior, R. Evans, J. Jumper, J. Kirkpatrick, L. Sifre, T. Green, C. Qin, A. Žídek, A. W. Nelson, A. Bridgland, et al., Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature577, 706 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Jumper, R

    J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Figurnov, O. Ronneberger, K. Tunyasuvunakool, R. Bates, A. Žídek, A. Potapenko, et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold, Nature596, 583 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    M. Gao, D. Nakajima An, J. M. Parks, and J. Skolnick, Af2complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning, Nat. Commun.13, 1744 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Abramson, J

    J. Abramson, J. Adler, J. Dunger, R. Evans, T. Green, A. Pritzel, O. Ronneberger, L. Willmore, A. J. Ballard, J. Bambrick, et al., Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3, Nature630, 493 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Z. Lin, H. Akin, R. Rao, B. Hie, Z. Zhu, W. Lu, N. Smetanin, R. Verkuil, O. Kabeli, Y. Shmueli, A. Dos Santos Costa, M. Fazel-Zarandi, T. Sercu, S. Candido, and A. Rives, Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model, Science379, 1123 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    M. Baek, F. DiMaio, I. Anishchenko, J. Dauparas, S. Ovchinnikov, G. R. Lee, J. Wang, Q. Cong, L. N. Kinch, R. D. Schaeffer, C. Milán, H. Park, C. Adams, C. R. Glassman, A. DeGiovanni, J. H. Pereira, A. V. Rodrigues, A. A. van Dijk, A. C. Ebrecht, D. J. Opperman, T. Sagmeister, C. Buhlheller, T. Pavkov-Keller, M. K. Rathinaswamy, U. Dalwadi, C. K. Yip, J. ...

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Humphreys, R

    R.Krishna, J.Wang, W.Ahern, P.Sturmfels, P.Venkatesh, I.Kalvet, G.R.Lee, F.S.Morey-Burrows, I.Anishchenko, I.R. Humphreys, R. McHugh, D. Vafeados, X. Li, G. A. Sutherland, A. Hitchcock, C. N. Hunter, A. Kang, E. Brackenbrough, A. K. Bera, M. Baek, F. DiMaio, and D. Baker, Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with rosettafold all-atom, Science 384,...

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    J. L. Watson, D. Juergens, N. R. Bennett, B. L. Trippe, J. Yim, H. E. Eisenach, W. Ahern, A. J. Borst, R. J. Ragotte, L. F. Milles, B. I. M. Wicky, N. Hanikel, S. J. Pellock, A. Courbet, W. Sheffler, J. Wang, P. Venkatesh, I. Sappington, S. Vázquez Torres, A. Lauko, V. De Bortoli, E. Mathieu, S. Ovchinnikov, R. Barzilay, T. S. Jaakola, F. DiMaio, M. Baek,...

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Petrović, V

    D. Petrović, V. A. Risso, S. C. L. Kamerlin, and J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz, Conformational dynamics and enzyme evolution, J. Roy. Soc. Interface15, 20180330 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Campitelli, T

    P. Campitelli, T. Modi, S. Kumar, and S. B. Ozkan, The role of conformational dynamics and allostery in modulating protein evolution, Ann. Rev. Biophys.49, 267 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    P. Ayaz, A. Lyczek, Y. Paung, V. R. Mingione, R. E. Iacob, P. W. de Waal, J. R. Engen, M. A. Seeliger, Y. Shan, and D. E. Shaw, Structural mechanism of a drug-binding process involving a large conformational change of the protein target, Nat. Commun.14, 1885 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne, The Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Res.28, 235 (2000), https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-pdf/28/1/235/9895144/280235.pdf

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Brändén and R

    G. Brändén and R. Neutze, Advances and challenges in time-resolved macromolecular crystallography, Science 373, eaba0954 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    D. R. Hekstra, Emerging time-resolved x-ray diffraction approaches for protein dynamics, Ann. Rev. Biophys.52, 255 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Nettels, N

    D. Nettels, N. Galvanetto, M. T. Ivanović, M. Nüesch, T. Yang, and B. Schuler, Single-molecule fret for probing nanoscale biomolecular dynamics, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 587 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Hohng, S

    S. Hohng, S. Lee, J. Lee, and M. H. Jo, Maximizing information content of single-molecule fret experiments: multi-color fret and fret combined with force or torque, Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 1007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    M. Götz, P. Wortmann, S. Schmid, and T. Hugel, A multicolor single-molecule fret approach to study protein dynamics and interactions simultaneously, inMethods in enzymology, Vol. 581 (Elsevier, 2016) pp. 487–516

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    H. S. Chung and W. A. Eaton, Protein folding transition path times from single molecule fret, Current opinion in structural biology 48, 30 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Yoo, J.-Y

    J. Yoo, J.-Y. Kim, J. M. Louis, I. V. Gopich, and H. S. Chung, Fast three-color single-molecule fret using statistical inference, Nat. Commun.11, 3336 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Barducci, G

    A. Barducci, G. Bussi, and M. Parrinello, Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 020603 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    M. C. Zwier, J. L. Adelman, J. W. Kaus, A. J. Pratt, K. F. Wong, N. B. Rego, E. Suárez, S. Lettieri, D. W. Wang, M. Grabe, D. M. Zuckerman, and L. T. Chong, Westpa: An interoperable, highly scalable software package for weighted ensemble simulation and analysis, J. Chem. Theory Comput.11, 800 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Lindorff-Larsen, S

    K. Lindorff-Larsen, S. Piana, R. O. Dror, and D. E. Shaw, How fast-folding proteins fold, Science334, 517 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Lindorff-Larsen, P

    K. Lindorff-Larsen, P. Maragakis, S. Piana, and D. E. Shaw, Picosecond to millisecond structural dynamics in human ubiquitin, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B120, 8313 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    D. E. Shaw, P. J. Adams, A. Azaria, J. A. Bank, B. Batson, A. Bell, M. Bergdorf, J. Bhatt, J. A. Butts, T. Correia, et al., Anton 3: Twenty microseconds of molecular dynamics simulation before lunch, inProceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (2021) pp. 1–11

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Zimmerman, J

    M. Zimmerman, J. Porter, M. Ward, S. Singh, N. Vithani, A. Meller, U. Mallimadugula, C. Kuhn, J. Borowsky, R. Wiewiora, et al. , Sars-cov-2 simulations go exascale to predict dramatic spike opening and cryptic pockets across the proteome, Nat. Chem.13, 651 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Z. F. Brotzakis and M. Parrinello, Enhanced sampling of protein conformational transitions via dynamically optimized collective variables, J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 1393 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Bonati, E

    L. Bonati, E. Trizio, A. Rizzi, and M. Parrinello, A unified framework for machine learning collective variables for enhanced sampling simulations: mlcolvar, J. Chem. Phys.159 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Shmilovich and A

    K. Shmilovich and A. L. Ferguson, Girsanov reweighting enhanced sampling technique (grest): On-the-fly data-driven discovery of and enhanced sampling in slow collective variables, J. Phys. Chem. A127, 3497 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Rydzewski, M

    J. Rydzewski, M. Chen, T. K. Ghosh, and O. Valsson, Reweighted manifold learning of collective variables from enhanced sampling simulations, J. Chem. Theory Comput.18, 7179 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Mehdi, Z

    S. Mehdi, Z. Smith, L. Herron, Z. Zou, and P. Tiwary, Enhanced sampling with machine learning, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 75 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    W. Shen, K. Wan, D. Li, H. Gao, and X. Shi, Adaptive cvgen: Leveraging reinforcement learning for advanced sampling in protein folding and chemical reactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A121, e2414205121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    M. A. Sauer and M. Heyden, Frequency-selective anharmonic mode analysis of thermally excited vibrations in proteins, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 5481 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Brooks and M

    B. Brooks and M. Karplus, Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A80, 6571 (1983)

    work page 1983

  41. [41]

    L. Yang, G. Song, and R. L. Jernigan, How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models?, Biophys. J.93, 920 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    Mahajan and Y.-H

    S. Mahajan and Y.-H. Sanejouand, Jumping between protein conformers using normal modes, J. Comput. Chem.38, 1622 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    M. G. Costa, P. R. Batista, A. Gomes, L. S. Bastos, M. Louet, N. Floquet, P. M. Bisch, and D. Perahia, Mdexciter: Enhanced sampling molecular dynamics by excited normal modes or principal components obtained from experiments, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 412 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Mondal, M

    S. Mondal, M. A. Sauer, and M. Heyden, Exploring conformational landscapes along anharmonic low-frequency vibrations, J. Phys. Chem. B128, 7112 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Y. M. Huang, J. A. McCammon, and Y. Miao, Replica exchange gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Improved enhanced sampling and free energy calculation, J. Chem. Theory Comput.14, 1853 (2018). 16

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    M.Benabderrahmane, R.Bureau, A.S.Voisin-Chiret,andJ.Sopkova-deOliveiraSantos,Insightsintomcl-1conformational states and allosteric inhibition mechanism from molecular dynamics simulations, enhanced sampling, and pocket crosstalk analysis, J. Chem. Inf. Model.60, 3172 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    W. Ren, H. M. Dokainish, A. Shinobu, H. Oshima, and Y. Sugita, Unraveling the coupling between conformational changes and ligand binding in ribose binding protein using multiscale molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations, J. Phys. Chem. B125, 2898 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    J. Chen, S. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Pang, Q. Zhang, and X. Liu, Mutation-induced impacts on the switch transformations of the gdp-and gtp-bound k-ras: insights from multiple replica gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics and free energy analysis, J. Chem. Inf. Model.61, 1954 (2021)

    work page 1954

  49. [49]

    De Simone, R

    A. De Simone, R. W. Montalvao, C. M. Dobson, and M. Vendruscolo, Characterization of the interdomain motions in hen lysozyme using residual dipolar couplings as replica-averaged structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations, Biochemistry 52, 6480 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [50]

    Branduardi, G

    D. Branduardi, G. Bussi, and M. Parrinello, Metadynamics with adaptive gaussians, J. Chem. Theory Comput.8, 2247 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Levitt, C

    M. Levitt, C. Sander, and P. S. Stern, Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme, J. Mol. Biol.181, 423 (1985)

    work page 1985

  52. [52]

    Chennubhotla, A

    C. Chennubhotla, A. Rader, L.-W. Yang, and I. Bahar, Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies, Phys. Biol.2, S173 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Consortium, Uniprot: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge, Nucleic Acids Res.47, D506 (2019)

    U. Consortium, Uniprot: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge, Nucleic Acids Res.47, D506 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    Janson, G

    G. Janson, G. Valdes-Garcia, L. Heo, and M. Feig, Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning, Nat. Commun.14, 774 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Tesei, A

    G. Tesei, A. I. Trolle, N. Jonsson, J. Betz, F. E. Knudsen, F. Pesce, K. E. Johansson, and K. Lindorff-Larsen, Conforma- tional ensembles of the human intrinsically disordered proteome, Nature626, 897 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    J. M. Lotthammer, G. M. Ginell, D. Griffith, R. Emenecker, and A. S. Holehouse, Direct prediction of intrinsically disordered protein conformational properties from sequence, Nat. Methods21, 465 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    D. M. Jennewein, J. Lee, C. Kurtz, W. Dizon, I. Shaeffer, A. Chapman, A. Chiquete, J. Burks, A. Carlson, N. Mason, A. Kobwala, T. Jagadeesan, P. Barghav, T. Battelle, R. Belshe, D. McCaffrey, M. Brazil, C. Inumella, K. Kuznia, J. Buzin- ski, S. Dudley, D. Shah, G. Speyer, and J. Yalim, The Sol Supercomputer at Arizona State University, inPractice and Expe...

    work page

  58. [58]

    M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. Páll, J. C. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, Gromacs: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX1, 19 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    W.-L.Jorgensen, J.Chandrasekhar, J.-D.Madura, R.-W.Impey,andM.-L.Klein,Comparisonofsimplepotentialfunctions for simulating liquid water, J. Chem. Phys.79, 926 (1983)

    work page 1983

  60. [60]

    A. D. MacKerell Jr, D. Bashford, M. L. D. R. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack Jr, J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, I. Reiher, W. E., B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiórkiewicz...

    work page 1998

  61. [61]

    Hornak, R

    V. Hornak, R. Abel, A. Okur, B. Strockbine, A. Roitberg, and C. Simmerling, Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf.65, 712 (2006)

    work page 2006

  62. [62]

    J. A. Maier, C. Martinez, K. Kasavajhala, L. Wickstrom, K. E. Hauser, and C. Simmerling, ff14sb: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99sb, J. Chem. Theory Comput.11, 3696 (2015), pMID: 26574453

    work page 2015

  63. [63]

    Huang, S

    J. Huang, S. Rauscher, G. Nawrocki, M. F. Ting Ran, B. L. de Groot, H. Grubmüller, and A. D. M. Jr, Charmm36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins, Nat. Methods14, 71 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Bussi, D

    G. Bussi, D. Donadio, and M. Parrinello, Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling, J. Chem. Phys.126, 014101 (2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    Bernetti and G

    M. Bernetti and G. Bussi, Pressure control using stochastic cell rescaling, J. Chem. Phys.153, 10.1063/5.0020514 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0020514 2020

  66. [66]

    Nosé, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Mol

    S. Nosé, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Mol. Phys.52, 255 (1984)

    work page 1984

  67. [67]

    W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A31, 1695 (1985)

    work page 1985

  68. [68]

    Parrinello and A

    M. Parrinello and A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981)

    work page 1981

  69. [69]

    B. Hess, H. Bekker, H. J. Berendsen, and J. G. Fraaije, Lincs: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations, J. Comput. Chem.18, 1463 (1997)

    work page 1997

  70. [70]

    Darden, D

    T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, Particle mesh ewald: An n log (n) method for ewald sums in large systems, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089 (1993)

    work page 1993

  71. [71]

    Bonomi, D

    M. Bonomi, D. Branduardi, G. Bussi, C. Camilloni, D. Provasi, P. Raiteri, D. Donadio, F. Marinelli, F. Pietrucci, R. A. Broglia, and M. Parrinello, Plumed: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics, Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 1961 (2009)

    work page 1961

  72. [72]

    G. A. Tribello, M. Bonomi, D. Branduardi, C. Camilloni, and G. Bussi, Plumed 2: New feathers for an old bird, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 604 (2014)

    work page 2014