Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Singlet fission contributes to solar energy harvesting in photosynthesis

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that purple-bacterial RC-LH1 complexes harvest extra sunlight by singlet fission across a carotenoid–bacteriochlorophyll pair, storing the energy as a triplet pair and later fusing it back into the bacteriochlorophyll Qy…

desk verdict Plausible heterofission claim, but the BChl triplet assignment and the 20% number need stronger support. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18801 v1 pith:6AAAUR52 submitted 2024-11-27 physics.bio-ph physics.chem-ph

Shuangqing Wang , George A. Sutherland , James P. Pidgeon , David J. K. Swainsbury , Elizabeth C. Martin , Cvetelin Vasilev , Andrew Hitchcock , Daniel J. Gillard
show 5 more authors
Ravi Kumar Venkatraman Dimitri Chekulaev Alexander I. Tartakovskii C. Neil Hunter Jenny Clark
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords singletfissionheterofissioncarotenoidbacteriochlorophylllight-harvestingcomplextriplet-tripletannihilationenergytransferRhodobactersphaeroides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This study argues that the light-harvesting RC-LH1 complexes of purple bacteria use singlet fission to convert one carotenoid excitation into a pair of triplets sitting on neighbouring carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll molecules. The pair is weakly coupled and long-lived, and later fuses back together to repopulate the bacteriochlorophyll Qy state. This gives carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer an extra channel, estimated to add up to about 20% for neurosporene. If correct, it turns a process usually studied for photovoltaics into a natural light-harvesting strategy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the heterofission triplet pair state 3Crt··3BChl, a weakly exchange-coupled pair of triplets localised on adjacent carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll pigments; it is identified by the magnetic-field dependence of delayed bacteriochlorophyll fluorescence and by a spectral fingerprint region (750–830 nm) where singlet Qy population gives positive absorption while triplet T1 gives bleaching. The argument also rests on an energy-budget identity, $\Phi_{\mathrm{EET}} = \Phi_{Q_x} + \Phi_{S_1 \to Q_y}(100 - \Phi_T - \Phi_{Q_x}) + \eta \Phi_T$, that partitions carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer among S2→Qx, S1→Qy, and fission-then-annihilation (T··T)→Qy channels, with $\eta$ the fraction of triplet pairs that recombine to Qy.

What would settle it

A concrete test is a transient absorption measurement that cleanly separates bacteriochlorophyll Qy and T1 contributions after carotenoid excitation, for example by using a probe window or a mutant where the two spectra are distinguishable; if the 750–830 nm signal stays positive (Qy-like) rather than bleaching (T1-like) on sub-picosecond timescales, the heterofission assignment is undercut. A second test is to measure delayed Qy emission against triplet yield at varying magnetic fields: if the delayed emission does not scale with triplet-pair population, the triplet-triplet-annihilation pathway to Qy would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that singlet fission in RC-LH1 complexes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides occurs by heterofission: excitation of the carotenoid S2 state produces a shared triplet pair state 3Crt··3BChl, with the two triplets delocalised over a carotenoid and a neighbouring bacteriochlorophyll molecule rather than on a single carotenoid. Magnetic-field-dependent photoluminescence shows a low-field feature characteristic of weakly exchange-coupled triplet pairs, and transient absorption assigns the bacteriochlorophyll signals in the 750–830 nm fingerprint region to triplet rather than singlet population. The triplet pair then decays by triplet-triplet annihilation, repopulating the bacteriochlorophyll Qy state and adding a triplet-mediated channel to carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer. For neurosporene-containing complexes this channel is estimated to contribute roughly 18–20% of the total energy-transfer efficiency, with smaller contributions for longer carotenoids.

Load-bearing premise

The claim assumes that the weak bacteriochlorophyll signals seen after carotenoid excitation are triplet (T1) population rather than singlet (Qy) population, and that the energy-budget equation has no direct losses from the S2 state or during Qx-to-Qy internal conversion; if either assumption fails, the inferred singlet-fission contribution to energy transfer is overestimated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the heterofission pathway is real, carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer in RC-LH1 complexes includes a triplet-mediated channel, so short-conjugation carotenoids like neurosporene can transfer more absorbed energy than the singlet routes alone would allow.
  • Because the triplet yield and the singlet-fission contribution both drop as carotenoid conjugation length increases, the pathway is most useful in organisms that use shorter carotenoids, which are common in low-light environments.
  • The combination of ultrafast pair formation with weak exchange coupling implies that the two triplets dynamically decouple after formation, a property that synthetic singlet-fission materials typically require triplet migration to achieve.
  • The same carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll pigments in LH2 complexes instead favour charge transfer, so the protein environment of LH1 appears to tune the system toward fission and energy storage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same measurement protocol could be applied to other antenna complexes that contain carotenoids and (bacterio)chlorophylls to see whether heterofission is a general light-harvesting strategy rather than a peculiarity of purple-bacterial LH1.
  • The energy-budget equation implies a quantitative prediction: if the S2→Qx or S1→Qy channels were blocked by mutation, the triplet-mediated channel should compensate and keep total energy transfer efficiency partly constant; this could be tested in engineered complexes.
  • Time-resolved EPR or magneto-optical measurements on the nanosecond timescale could directly track the triplet-pair coherence that the paper invokes to explain why more than 60% of the triplet pairs recombine to the singlet Qy state; the paper only speculates on this point.
  • The SF pathway would be expected to saturate under intense light, because the triplet pairs are long-lived; high-fluence excitation could therefore reveal a ceiling on the additional energy-transfer gain, which matters for any photovoltaic or photocatalytic application.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that singlet fission (SF) in RC-LH1 complexes from Rhodobacter sphaeroides occurs via heterofission: excitation of the carotenoid S2 state generates a shared, weakly exchange-coupled triplet pair on a carotenoid and a neighboring bacteriochlorophyll a, and the subsequent triplet-triplet annihilation repopulates the BChl Qy state. The evidence combines magnetic-field-dependent photoluminescence, transient absorption, delayed fluorescence, and a series of carotenoids of varying conjugation length, together with a yield-budget model that estimates the SF-mediated contribution to Crt-to-BChl energy transfer at up to about 20% (for neurosporene). The authors also propose that this pathway functionally enhances light harvesting by temporarily storing excitation energy in long-lived triplet pairs.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper overturns the long-standing view that SF in photosynthetic antenna complexes is an intramolecular carotenoid process, and it assigns a functional, energy-harvesting role to SF in a natural light-harvesting system. The systematic comparison of five engineered carotenoid variants, the combination of magneto-optical and transient absorption data, and the candid reporting of failed global analyses are notable strengths. The observation of delayed emission that tracks triplet population is an independent piece of evidence that a triplet reservoir repopulates Qy, and the tandem decay of carotenoid and BChl signatures is suggestive of a coupled triplet pair. At the same time, the paper's own analysis flags that the BChl triplet assignment and the quantitative yield budget rest on weak signals, correlated spectral components, and literature-derived scaling factors; these limitations need to be resolved before the headline 20% contribution can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Section 5.1 and Fig. S10C; main text Fig. 3C] The central mechanistic claim, heterofission producing a BChl triplet, depends on the assignment of the weak 750–830 nm and 650 nm features to T1 rather than Qy. The authors state in Supplementary Section 5.1 that MCR-ALS could not separate species beyond S1 and that Glotaran target analysis failed, with persistent correlations at 520 and 780 nm. Given that the Qy and T1 spectra are very similar in the visible and that Qy produces a 2.5x stronger ground-state bleach, the visual match of the 30 ps Neu spectrum to the Crtless T1 reference in Fig. 3C is not sufficient to exclude a significant Qy component. Please provide a quantitative decomposition (for example, target analysis with fixed reference spectra and explicit error propagation, or a wavelength-by-wavelength kinetic analysis after subtracting the Qy contribution) that supports the T1 assignment and constrains the possible Qy contamination.
  2. [Table S2] There is an internal inconsistency in the reported triplet yields. For Spn–RC-LH1, Table S2 lists a BChl a triplet yield of 26.9% and a Crt triplet yield of 13.6%, although heterofission should generate equal numbers of the two triplets. One of these signals must be contaminated or partially mis-assigned. This inconsistency directly affects the quantitative yield estimates used in Eq. 1 and therefore the reported SF-mediated EET contribution. Please address whether the BChl T1 yield was extracted from a spectrally clean region, and discuss what the unequal yields imply for the assignment or for additional triplet generation/decay pathways.
  3. [Supplementary Section 7, Eq. 1, and Fig. S18] The estimate that up to about 20% of Crt-to-BChl energy transfer proceeds via SF is obtained by solving Eq. 1 for η using ΦQx values that are themselves scaled from LH2 spectral overlap factors (Ref. 30) rather than measured in these RC-LH1 complexes. The parametric plot in Fig. S18 shows that for Neu the extracted η is strongly correlated with the assumed ΦQx, and the assumption of no direct S2 losses and no losses during Qx-to-Qy internal conversion is not tested. Because the headline number depends on this closure, please provide a sensitivity analysis over the assumed ΦQx and the omitted loss channels, and ideally a direct measurement or independent constraint on ΦQx in these complexes (for example, from S2/Qx excitation profiles or from a fully constrained kinetic model).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Fig. 3D and Section 5.3] The caption and Section 5.3 explain that the 505 nm and 650 nm transients behave differently between 1–15 ns due to different excitation conditions in the ps–ns and ns–ms setups; this is important context but is easy to miss, and the text would benefit from stating explicitly in the main text that the tandem-decay claim applies outside this overlap window.
  2. [Supplementary Section 6] There is a typo in the sentence describing the iCCD sensitivity: "drops of significantly" should be "drops off significantly."
  3. [Table S1] The notation for the S1 lifetime in solution, τSol S1, is used inconsistently with the equation below it, and the table entries for Lyc and dikSpx do not include a ΦQx column; adding the missing entries and a consistent symbol legend would improve readability.
  4. [Main text, Fig. 5] The caption states that "the general trend is a reduction in both triplet yield and EET efficiency with increasing Crt conjugation length," but Spn is an exception; the caption should acknowledge this explicitly to avoid overstating the monotonic trend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central heterofission and TTA-to-Qy claims rest on independent observables, and the 20% SF-EET figure is a transparent, assumption-dependent residual rather than a hidden fit or predicted result.

full rationale

After walking the claimed derivation chain, I find no step that reduces to its own inputs by construction or by a load-bearing self-citation. The heterofission mechanism is assembled from independent observables: (i) magnetic-field effects interpreted with the established Merrifield framework; (ii) comparison of early-time Neu TA spectra with reference Qy and T1 spectra measured in Crtless complexes; (iii) tandem ps-to-microsecond decays of Crt triplet ESA and the BChl 650 nm band; and (iv) delayed Qy emission appearing on triplet timescales. None of these observables is defined in terms of the conclusion. The energy-budget identity in Supplementary Eq. 1, ΦEET = ΦQx + ΦS1→Qy(100−ΦT−ΦQx) + ηΦT, is used to estimate the SF-mediated EET term ηΦT as a residual after assigning the other channels from measurements and literature-scaled estimates. This does make the specific "up to 20%" figure assumption-dependent, but the paper explicitly labels it a best-guess estimate with large errors and does not present it as an independent prediction. The self-citations present in the paper (e.g., Refs. 23 and 55) provide data from other complexes or external experiments and are not the sole support for any load-bearing step. The paper's own admission that MCR-ALS could not cleanly separate BChl components, and the Table S2 inequality between Crt and BChl triplet yields, are assignment-uncertainty and internal-consistency concerns, not circularity of the derivation. Accordingly, the qualitative claims are self-contained against the measured observables, and no circular step meeting the evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated. The 'heterofission' term names a process, and the 3Crt..3BChl pair is an electronic state inferred from spectra. The free parameters listed above are the quantities that make the quantitative claim (up to 20% SF-mediated EET) work: eta is a closure residual, Phi_Qx is a scaled estimate, and the Spn S1 energy is adjusted to keep the energetics favorable.

free parameters (3)
  • eta (fraction of triplet-pair states that convert to Qy) = Neu 0.66 +/- 0.3; Sph 0.9 +/- 0.7; Spn 0.65 +/- 0.4
    Solved as the residual of Eq 1 after assigning all other pathway yields; its product with the triplet yield is the reported SF-mediated EET of about 18-20%.
  • Phi_Qx (S2-to-Qx EET efficiency) = Neu 20 +/- 10%; Sph 44 +/- 10%; Spn 64 +/- 10%; Lyc 51 +/- 10%
    Best-guess estimates obtained by scaling spectral overlap factors from Cong et al. to the rhodopin glucoside value (SI Section 7.4). These values directly control the size of the inferred SF channel.
  • Spn S1 energy = 1.70 eV (versus accepted 1.61-1.63 eV from TA spectroscopy)
    Re-estimated in SI Section 8 using conjugation-length and energy-gap-law correlations so that the triplet-pair state lies above S1, which makes TTA-to-Qy energetically plausible.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption No losses to the ground state directly from S2, and no losses during Qx-to-Qy internal conversion.
    Stated in SI Section 7 ('Here, we assume no losses...'); this closure assumption is required to solve Eq 1 for eta and to obtain the SF-mediated EET fraction.
  • domain assumption Carotenoid conformation and protein structure are broadly independent of which carotenoid is incorporated.
    Main text: 'We therefore make the assumption that the conformations of the proteins and the pigments within them are broadly independent of Crt.' This supports comparing photophysics across the mutant series.
  • domain assumption Singlet fission occurs directly from the Crt S2 state, within about 170 fs, competing with S2-to-S1 internal conversion and S2-to-Qx transfer.
    Used in SI Section 7 to define the pathway scheme and to explain the conjugation-length dependence of triplet yield; it is inferred from monoexponential rise fits rather than proven by a kinetic model.
  • standard math Merrifield and Benk-Sixl theory for magnetic field effects of weakly exchange-coupled triplet pairs.
    Used to interpret the low-field MFE shape as singlet fission with small inter-triplet exchange coupling (main text and refs 40, 41, 50).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Singlet fission contributes to solar energy harvesting in photosynthesis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6AAAUR52

@misc{pith2026241118801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Singlet fission contributes to solar energy harvesting in photosynthesis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6AAAUR52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18801}
}
read the original abstract

Singlet fission (SF), the spin-allowed conversion of one singlet exciton into two triplet excitons, offers a promising strategy for enhancing the efficiency of photovoltaic devices. However, realising this potential necessitates materials capable of ultrafast (sub-picosecond) SF and the generation of long-lived (> microsecond) triplet excitons, a synthetic challenge. Some photosynthetic organisms have evolved sophisticated molecular architectures that demonstrate these criteria, but despite 40 years of study, the underlying SF mechanisms and its functional significance in these organisms remain unclear. Here, we use a suite of ultrafast and magneto-optical spectroscopic techniques to understand the mechanism of SF within light-harvesting 1 (LH1) complexes from wild-type and genetically modified photosynthetic bacteria. Our findings reveal a SF process, termed "heterofission", wherein singlet excitons are transformed into triplet excitons localised on adjacent carotenoid (Crt) and bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) molecules. We also uncover an unexpected functional role for SF in augmenting Crt-to-BChl photosynthetic energy transfer efficiency. By transiently storing electronic excitation within the SF-generated triplet pair, the system circumvents rapid thermalisation of Crt excitations, thereby enhancing energy transfer efficiency to the BChl Qy state, and enabling the organism to usefully harvest more sunlight.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Qian, P., Hunter, C

    Sutherland, G. A., Qian, P., Hunter, C. N., Swainsbury, D. J. & Hitchcock, A. Engineering purple bacterial carotenoid biosynthesis to study the roles of carotenoids in light-harvesting complexes. Methods in Enzymology 674, 137–184 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Macernis, M. et al. Resonance raman spectra of carotenoid molecules: influence of methyl substitutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 119, 56–66 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Yu, J. et al. Carotenoid singlet fission reactions in bacterial light harvesting complexes as revealed by triplet excitation profiles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, 15984–15993 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    V., Horton, P

    Ruban, A. V., Horton, P. & Robert, B. Resonance raman spectroscopy of the photosystem ii light-harvesting complex of green plants: a comparison of trimeric and aggregated states. Biochemistry 34, 2333–2337 (1995)

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    V., Pascal, A

    Ruban, A. V., Pascal, A. A. & Robert, B. Xanthophylls of the major pho- tosynthetic light-harvesting complex of plants: identification, conformation and dynamics. FEBS letters 477, 181–185 (2000)

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    & Neumann, J.-M

    Lutz, M., Szponarski, W., Berger, G., Robert, B. & Neumann, J.-M. The stereoisomerism of bacterial, reaction-center-bound carotenoids revisited: an elec- tronic absorption, resonance raman and 1h-nmr study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics 894, 423–433 (1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Papagiannakis, E. et al. Light harvesting by carotenoids incorporated into the B850 light-harvesting complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26.1: Excited- state relaxation, ultrafast triplet formation, and energy transfer to bacteriochloro- phyll. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107, 5642–5649 (2003). 35

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Kurashov, V. et al. Critical evaluation of electron transfer kinetics in P700– FA/FB, P700–FX, and P700–A1 Photosystem I core complexes in liquid and in trehalose glass. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics 1859, 1288–1301 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Kakitani, Y. et al. Conjugation-length dependence of the t1 lifetimes of carotenoids free in solution and incorporated into the lh2, lh1, rc, and rc-lh1 complexes: possible mechanisms of triplet-energy dissipation. Biochemistry 46, 2181–2197 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Gradinaru, C. C. et al. An unusual pathway of excitation energy deactivation in carotenoids: Singlet-to-triplet conversion on an ultrafast timescale in a photosyn- thetic antenna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 2364–2369 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    J., Land, E

    Cogdell, R. J., Land, E. J. & Truscott, T. G. The triplet extinction coefficients of some bacterial carotenoids. Photochemistry and Photobiology 38, 723–725 (1983)

    1983

  4. [12]

    F., McGarvey, D

    Borland, C. F., McGarvey, D. J., Truscott, T. G., Codgell, R. J. & Land, E. J. Photophysical studies of bacteriochlorophyll a and bacteriopheophytin a - singlet oxygen generation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B: Biology 1, 93–101 (1987)

    1987

  5. [13]

    Kosumi, D., Nishiguchi, T., Amao, Y., Cogdell, R. J. & Hashimoto, H. Singlet and triplet excited states dynamics of photosynthetic pigment chlorophyll a inves- tigated by sub-nanosecond pump-probe spectroscopy. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 358, 374–3...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Kosumi, D., Horibe, T., Sugisaki, M., Cogdell, R. J. & Hashimoto, H. Photo- protection mechanism of light-harvesting antenna complex from purple bacteria. 36 Journal of Physical Chemistry B 120, 951–956 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    & Tauler, R

    Jaumot, J., Gargallo, R., de Juan, A. & Tauler, R. A graphical user-friendly interface for MCR-ALS: a new tool for multivariate curve resolution in MATLAB. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 76, 101–110 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    & Tauler, R

    Jaumot, J., de Juan, A. & Tauler, R. MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: New features and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 140, 1–12 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    & Angerhofer, A

    Hartwich, G., Scheer, H., Aust, V. & Angerhofer, A. Absorption and ADMR studies on bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres with modified pigments. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics 1230, 97–113 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    G., Cogdell, R

    Monger, T. G., Cogdell, R. J. & Parson, W. W. Triplet states of bacteriochloro- phyll and carotenoids in chromatophores of photosynthetic bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 449, 136–153 (1976)

    1976

  11. [19]

    Niedzwiedzki, D. M. & Blankenship, R. E. Singlet and triplet excited state prop- erties of natural chlorophylls and bacteriochlorophylls. Photosynthesis Research 106, 227–238 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Uragami, C. et al. Photoprotective mechanisms in the core lh1 antenna pigment-protein complex from the purple photosynthetic bacterium, rhodospir- illum rubrum. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 400, 112628 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    & Tanaka, I

    Tobita, S., Kaizu, Y., Kobayashi, H. & Tanaka, I. Study of higher excited singlet states of zinc (II)-tetraphenylporphin. The Journal of Chemical Physics 81, 2962–2969 (1984). 37

    1984

  14. [22]

    J., Laptenok, S., Seger, R., Mullen, K

    Snellenburg, J. J., Laptenok, S., Seger, R., Mullen, K. M. & van Stokkum, I. H. M. Glotaran: A Java-based graphical user interface for the R package TIMP. Journal of Statistical Software 49, 1–22 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    M., Swainsbury, D

    Niedzwiedzki, D. M., Swainsbury, D. J. K., Martin, E. C., Hunter, C. N. & Blankenship, R. E. Origin of the S* excited state feature of carotenoids in light- harvesting complex 1 from purple photosynthetic bacteria. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 121, 7571–7585 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    S., Watanabe, Y., Fujii, R

    Rondonuwu, F. S., Watanabe, Y., Fujii, R. & Koyama, Y. A first detection of singlet to triplet conversion from the 1 1B− u to the 13Ag state and triplet internal conversion from the 1 3Ag to the 1 3Bu state in carotenoids: Dependence on the conjugation length. Chemical Physics...

    2003

  17. [25]

    Niedzwiedzki, D. M. et al. Ultrafast time-resolved absorption spectroscopy of geometric isomers of carotenoids. Chemical physics 357, 4–16 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    & Koyama, Y

    Zhang, J.-P., Inaba, T. & Koyama, Y. The role of the newly-found 1bu- state of carotenoid in mediating the 1bu+-to-2ag- internal conversion and the excited- state dynamics of carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll in a bacterial antenna complex. Journal of Molecular Structure 598,...

    2001

  19. [27]

    Mendes-Pinto, M. M. et al. Electronic absorption and ground state structure of carotenoid molecules. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117, 11015–11021 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Musser, A. J. & Clark, J. Triplet-pair states in organic semiconductors. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 70, 323–351 (2019). 38

    2019

  21. [29]

    M., Swainsbury, D

    Niedzwiedzki, D. M., Swainsbury, D. J., Canniffe, D. P., Neil Hunter, C. & Hitchcock, A. A photosynthetic antenna complex foregoes unity carotenoid-to- bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer efficiency to ensure photoprotection. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences o...

    2020

  22. [30]

    Cong, H. et al. Ultrafast time-resolved carotenoid to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer in LH2 complexes from photosynthetic bacteria. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 112, 10689–10703 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    P., Scholes, G

    Krueger, B. P., Scholes, G. D., Jimenez, R. & Fleming, G. R. Electronic excitation transfer from carotenoid to bacteriochlorophyll in the purple bac- terium rhodopseudomonas acidophila. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 102, 2284–2292 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    N., Arellano, J

    Macpherson, A. N., Arellano, J. B., Fraser, N. J., Cogdell, R. J. & Gillbro, T. Efficient energy transfer from the carotenoid S 2 state in a photosynthetic light- harvesting complex. Biophysical Journal 80, 923–930 (2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    Zhang, J.-P. et al. Mechanism of the carotenoid-to-bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer via the S1 state in the LH2 complexes from purple bacteria. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 104, 3683–3691 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    ˇSlouf, V. et al. Carotenoid to bacteriochlorophyll energy transfer in the RC-LH1-PufX complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides containing the extended conjugation keto-carotenoid diketospirilloxanthin. Photosynthesis research 135, 33–43 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    S., Fiedor, L., Watanabe, Y

    Akahane, J., Rondonuwu, F. S., Fiedor, L., Watanabe, Y. & Koyama, Y. Dependence of singlet-energy transfer on the conjugation length of carotenoids 39 reconstituted into the LH1 complex from Rhodospirillum rubrum G9. Chemical Physics Letters 393, 184–191 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Chi, S. C. et al. Assembly of functional photosystem complexes in Rhodobac- ter sphaeroides incorporating carotenoids from the spirilloxanthin pathway. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Bioenergetics 1847, 189–201 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    & Tasumi, M

    Noguchi, T., Hayashi, H. & Tasumi, M. Factors controlling the efficiency of energy transfer from carotenoids to bacteriochlorophyll in purple photosynthetic bacteria. BBA - Bioenergetics 1017, 280–290 (1990)

    1990

  30. [38]

    & Duysens, L

    Kingma, H., van Grondelle, R. & Duysens, L. N. M. Magnetic-field effects in photosynthetic bacteria. I. Magnetic-field-induced bacteriochlorophyll emis- sion changes in the reaction center and the antenna of Rhodospirillum rubrum, Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides and Prosthecochlo...

    1985

  31. [39]

    & Duysens, L

    Kingma, H., van Grondelle, R. & Duysens, L. N. M. Magnetic-field effects in photosynthetic bacteria. II. Formation of triplet states in the reaction center and the antenna of Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Magnetic-field effects. Biochimica et Biophysi...

    1985

  32. [40]

    J., Van Grondelle, R

    Rademaker, H., Hoff, A. J., Van Grondelle, R. & Duysens, L. N. M. Carotenoid triplet yields in normal and deuterated Rhodospirillum rubrum. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Bioenergetics 592, 240–257 (1980)

    1980

  33. [41]

    & Hashimoto, H

    Sashima, T., Koyama, Y., Yamada, T. & Hashimoto, H. The 1B+ u , 1B− u , and 2Ag- energies of crystalline lycopene, β-carotene, and mini-9-β-carotene as determined by resonance-Raman excitation profiles: dependence of the Bu-state energy on the 40 conjugation length. The Journa...

    2000

  34. [42]

    Frank, H. A. & Pol´ ıvka, T. Energy transfer from carotenoids to bacteriochloro- phylls, 213–230 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    E., Jimenez, R

    Ricci, M., Bradforth, S. E., Jimenez, R. & Fleming, G. R. Internal conversion and energy transfer dynamics of spheroidene in solution and in the LH-1 and LH-2 light-harvesting complexes. Chemical physics letters 259, 381–390 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    Bossanyi, D. G. et al. In optimized rubrene-based nanoparticle blends for photon upconversion, singlet energy collection outcompetes triplet-pair separation, not singlet fission. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 10, 4684–4696 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Zigmantas, D. et al. Effect of a conjugated carbonyl group on the photophysical properties of carotenoids. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 6, 3009–3016 (2004)

    2004

  38. [46]

    & Watanabe, Y

    Fujii, R., Onaka, K., Kuki, M., Koyama, Y. & Watanabe, Y. The 2A − g ener- gies of all-trans-neurosporene and spheroidene as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. Chemical physics letters 288, 847–853 (1998)

    1998

  39. [47]

    Frank, H. A. et al. Spectroscopic properties of spheroidene analogs having differ- ent extents ofπ-electron conjugation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 101, 149–157 (1997)

    1997

  40. [48]

    & Frank, H

    Chynwat, V. & Frank, H. A. The application of the energy gap law to the S 1 energies and dynamics of carotenoids. Chemical physics 194, 237–244 (1995). 41

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.