Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Enhanced solid solution hardening by off-center substitutional solute atoms in {\alpha}-Ti

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In α-titanium, solute atoms that shift off their lattice sites create a much stronger drag on dislocations than classical theory predicts, including a new interaction with screw dislocations.

desk verdict First quantitative treatment of off-center solutes in α-Ti strengthening, with a plausible qualitative mechanism but a load-bearing fixed-dipole assumption that needs testing before the numbers are trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01298 v1 pith:S7KSDHHH submitted 2024-12-02 physics.comp-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Zi-Han Yu , Shuo Cao , Rui Yang , Qing-Miao Hu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.comp-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords solidsolutionhardeningoff-centersoluteatomJahn-Tellersplittingelasticdipoletensortitaniumalloydislocationinteractionfirst-principlescalculationsLabuschmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper contends that the textbook assumption—substitutional solute atoms sit on high-symmetry lattice sites—misses the dominant hardening mechanism in α-titanium alloys. First-principles calculations show that six transition-metal solutes (Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Tc, Re) spontaneously shift to low-symmetry off-center sites, driven by Jahn-Teller splitting of their d-orbitals, and that the resulting lattice distortion is much larger and non-uniform. Using continuum elasticity with an elastic dipole tensor, the paper computes interaction energies and glide forces with basal and prismatic edge and screw $\langle a\rangle$ dislocations. It finds that the low-symmetry solutes interact much more strongly than their high-symmetry counterparts and, unlike ordinary substitutional solutes, also interact with screw dislocations. If correct, the critical resolved shear stress increments from these solutes are more than an order of magnitude larger than predicted by the classical picture, so solid solution hardening in such alloys has been substantially underestimated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the elastic dipole tensor ($\lambda$-tensor) of the solute, obtained from first-principles supercell calculations of the strain as a function of solute concentration. The tensor is rotated from the solute's principal axes into each dislocation slip-system coordinate frame, and the interaction energy is computed as $E_{\mathrm{int}} = -V_0 \lambda'_{ij} \sigma_{ij}$. The glide force $F_x = \partial E_{\mathrm{int}}/\partial x$ is then fed into the Labusch model to evaluate $\Delta\tau$. The key quantity is the dipole shape factor $|\lambda_1 - \lambda_2|$, which measures how strongly the off-center distortion breaks the hexagonal symmetry; the paper shows $\Delta\tau$ is linear in this factor for all four dislocation types.

What would settle it

A direct atomistic calculation that places a single Mo solute near a prismatic screw dislocation in α-Ti and relaxes the structure would show whether the predicted elastic-dipole force survives: if the solute sits at the predicted on-slip-plane atmosphere position with the relaxed energy matching $E_{\mathrm{int}} = -V_0\lambda'\sigma$, the model holds; if the dipole reorients or weakens near the core, the energies will diverge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a substitutional solute sitting on a low-symmetry off-center site acts as an orthorhombic elastic dipole rather than an elastic monopole, and this changes both the strength and the geometry of solute–dislocation interactions. For Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Tc, and Re in α-Ti, the dipole shape factor $|\lambda_1-\lambda_2|$ is large, and the interaction energy with basal and prismatic $\langle a\rangle$ dislocations is dominated by this shape factor rather than by atomic size mismatch. The paper shows that the critical resolved shear stress increment $\Delta\tau$ from most low-symmetry solutes is more than an order of magnitude larger than that of the same solute at a high-symmetry site, and that these off-center solutes interact strongly with screw dislocations, where high-symmetry substitutional solutes have essentially zero elastic interaction. The hardening correlates linearly with $|\lambda_1-\lambda_2|$, which in turn is set by the strength of the Jahn-Teller splitting of the solute d-orbitals.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume the off-center solute's displacement direction and dipole tensor remain exactly the same everywhere around a dislocation, including right next to the dislocation line inside the core.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Tc, and Re prefer the low-symmetry off-center site in α-Ti, while V, Nb, and Ta stay on the high-symmetry site.
  • Off-center solutes interact strongly with screw dislocations, giving a pinning mechanism that no substitutional solute was previously expected to provide.
  • For most of these solutes the CRSS increment is more than an order of magnitude larger than for the same solute on a high-symmetry site; for Tc and Re on prismatic edge dislocations it is about 25 times larger.
  • Low-symmetry solutes form solute atmospheres on the slip plane of prismatic dislocations, a signature distinct from the Cottrell atmosphere of high-symmetry solutes.
  • The hardening of low-symmetry solutes is governed by the Jahn-Teller-driven dipole shape factor $|\lambda_1-\lambda_2|$, not by atomic size mismatch, which controls the high-symmetry case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rigid-dipole description holds in other hexagonal metals such as zirconium and hafnium, transition-metal solutes with degenerate d states should show the same off-center hardening enhancement, which would enlarge the set of alloy systems where classical solid solution hardening models under-predict strength.
  • The predicted reversal of basal versus prismatic slip priority in Ti-Mo at around 0.4 at.% could be tested directly with single-crystal micropillar compression as a function of Mo content.
  • Because the elastic-dipole model necessarily fails inside the dislocation core, a full validation requires atomistic simulations of a screw dislocation with a nearby low-symmetry solute; the paper itself lists this as follow-up work.
  • At elevated temperature, thermal fluctuations may reorient or weaken the Jahn-Teller dipole as a dislocation approaches; if so, the hardening increment would be temperature-dependent in a way the continuum model does not capture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates the solid solution hardening (SSH) contribution of off-center (low-symmetry, LS) substitutional solutes in α-Ti. Using DFT-derived elastic dipole (λ) tensors, isotropic dislocation stress fields, and the Labusch model, the authors compute solute-dislocation interaction energies, forces, and critical resolved shear stress increments for basal and prismatic edge and screw <a> dislocations. They consider nine solutes, six of which (Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Tc, Re) occupy LS off-center sites according to prior work. The central claim is that LS solutes interact much more strongly with dislocations than their high-symmetry (HS) counterparts, including a new interaction with screw dislocations, leading to strength increments that are, for most LS solutes, more than an order of magnitude larger than for HS solutes.

Significance. If correct, the paper challenges the standard treatment of substitutional solutes as elastic monopoles and identifies a new class of strong strengtheners in hcp metals. The prediction that LS solutes interact with screw dislocations and form atmospheres on the slip plane is concrete and could be tested by high-resolution microscopy or by comparing basal vs prismatic slip activity. The methodology is transparent and reproducible from the manuscript's description, and the qualitative predictions (atmosphere locations, slip-system selectivity) are falsifiable. However, the quantitative strength increments rest on assumptions that the manuscript does not test, in particular the rigidity of the LS elastic dipole in the dislocation stress field. The paper is a useful conceptual and methodological contribution, but its headline quantitative claim is overstated relative to the reported results.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1 Eqs. (10)–(11), §3.2, §3.5, §3.6] The central prediction rests on the assumption that the LS solute's elastic dipole tensor, obtained from stress-free supercells, is rigid and unchanged at every position in the dislocation stress field. Forces are evaluated at h=2b≈5.9 Å, where the shear stress is about 4 GPa (≈8% shear strain). The elastic interaction energy at these positions, of order V0 λ σ ≈ 0.1–0.3 eV, is comparable to the Jahn–Teller stabilization energies in Table 1 (0.045–0.311 eV). Under this stress the three equivalent <10-10> LS variants are no longer degenerate, so the solute may reorient to the variant with the most favorable coupling, or its off-center displacement magnitude may change. The screw-dislocation interaction and the large Δτ ratios are entirely produced by the shear components λ'_xz and λ'_yz of the unperturbed tensor. The manuscript does not test this fixed-dipole approximation; a validation against supercells with applied strain, or at least a bound on the error, is needed before the quantitative claims can be accepted.
  2. [§3.6, Fig. 14a, Abstract] The abstract's claim that 'the strength increments caused by most of the LS solute atoms are more than an order of magnitude higher than those by their HS counterparts' is contradicted by the paper's own results for basal plane edge dislocations. The text accompanying Fig. 14a states that for BPED 'for most of the SAs, the ΔτLS/ΔτHS ratio is small ... except for Mo and W.' Ratios above 10 hold for the prismatic edge and for screw dislocations (where ΔτHS ≈ 0), but not for basal edge dislocations. The abstract and Section 3.6 should qualify the claim to specific dislocation types.
  3. [§3.2, Fig. 4] The λ tensors for all solutes other than Mo are obtained from a single 4×4×2 supercell, using the approximation λ_i ≈ ε_i/c0. No supercell-size convergence check or error estimate is provided for these eight solutes. Since Δτ scales approximately as λ^(2/3), uncertainties in λ propagate directly into the reported strengthening increments. The manuscript should demonstrate convergence for at least one additional solute (e.g., Re or Mn) and report uncertainties, especially for the small HS λ values where the strain–concentration fit for Mo already shows large scatter.
  4. [§3.6, Eq. (13), §4.2] The Labusch-model predictions use fixed choices for the interaction width w≈5b, concentration c=0.4 at.%, and Schmid factor S_F=0.5, but no sensitivity analysis is given; w in particular is taken from a different alloy system. More importantly, for prismatic edge and screw dislocations the LS solutes are found to segregate on the slip plane (Section 4.2), yet the reported Δτ values in Section 3.6 are computed exclusively from F_m at h=2b above the slip plane. The on-slip-plane configurations, which are the physically relevant atmospheres, are acknowledged to be 'tricky' but are not quantified. The authors should either justify that h=2b captures the dominant strengthening or report Δτ for the on-slip-plane case, and should assess the sensitivity to w and c.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The label 'RMSE' in the figure panels is almost certainly R² (coefficient of determination); the values 0.923, 0.467, 0.99 are consistent with R², not root-mean-square error. Please correct the label and add units.
  2. [Table 1] For V, Nb, and Ta, the reported Δd values are nonzero (0.047, 0.028, 0.007 Å). The text says these solutes 'go back' to the HS site. Please clarify whether these residual displacements are within numerical noise or represent a shallow metastable LS state.
  3. [§2.1, Eq. (12)] The sign convention for the force F_x = ∂E_int/∂x is not stated. Since a negative energy gradient corresponds to a force in the negative x direction for the dislocation, the authors should specify the sign convention or add a minus sign if the force on the dislocation is intended.
  4. [§2.1, §3.5] Section 2.1 states that a cylinder of radius r0 = b to 4b is excluded from the elastic stress field, but Section 3.5 evaluates forces at h = 2b. If the core radius is as large as 4b, h=2b lies inside the excluded region. Please clarify the consistency of the chosen core cutoff and the evaluation height.
  5. [Table 3] In the BPSD LS row for V, the value of λ'_xz is listed as 0.0130, while the corresponding values in other rows are given as 0.013. The extra digit appears to be a typographical inconsistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Δτ values are outputs of a DFT-to-elasticity pipeline whose inputs (λ tensors, Volterra stress fields, Labusch parameters) are not fitted to the predicted hardening; the prior same-group LS prediction is recomputed independently in Table 1.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The λ tensors in Section 3.2 come from DFT supercell relaxation and Eqs. (5)–(9), the dislocation stress fields are the standard isotropic elasticity expressions in Eqs. (1)–(2), and the strength increments are obtained from the elastic dipole interaction (Eq. 10) together with the Labusch model (Eq. 13). None of these inputs is adjusted to reproduce Δτ or the Δτ_LS/Δτ_HS ratios; the order-of-magnitude enhancement is a computed output, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The main self-citation is the prior prediction of off-center LS occupancy (Refs. [26,27]), but this does not carry the argument by itself because Section 3.1 and Table 1 re-derive the LS stability, displacement Δd, and energy difference ΔE by fresh DFT relaxations. The Δτ_LS versus |λ1−λ2| correlation in Fig. 16 is a same-dataset interpretation rather than an independent test, and the fixed-λ approximation near the core is a physical assumption, but neither makes the result equal to its input by construction. The paper even flags the region where elasticity fails (h=2b and the core cutoff), so the limitations are acknowledged rather than hidden. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central calculation adds no new physical entities; it relies on standard elasticity and prior DFT predictions. The free parameters listed are the modeling choices that set the absolute magnitude of Δτ and the λ tensor extraction shortcut.

free parameters (4)
  • w (interaction range in Labusch model) = 5b (~14.7 Å)
    Taken from ref [40] without sensitivity analysis; Δτ depends on w^(-1/3), so the effect is moderate.
  • c (solute concentration for Δτ) = 0.4 at.%
    Chosen by hand to reflect limited solubility; Δτ scales as c^(2/3), so this choice affects absolute MPa values.
  • Schmid factor S_F = 0.5 (maximum)
    Set to its maximum value; real polycrystal texture would lower it.
  • λ_i principal tensor components for 8 solutes besides Mo = listed in Fig. 4, one supercell size
    Approximated as ε_i/c0 from a single 4×4×2 supercell instead of a concentration fit; finite-size and image effects are not quantified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Isotropic elasticity stress fields (Eqs. 1 and 2) apply to hcp α-Ti.
    α-Ti is elastically anisotropic, but the paper uses isotropic G and ν and does not compare with anisotropic solutions.
  • domain assumption The solute can be represented as an elastic dipole with a fixed λ tensor (Eqs. 5 to 11).
    Standard for dilute point defects, but assumes linear response and no reorientation near dislocations.
  • domain assumption The Labusch model (Eq. 13) describes the CRSS increment.
    Statistical theory assumes random solute distribution and weak obstacles; not justified here beyond citation.
  • domain assumption DFT/PBE relaxation finds the true stable LS site.
    No convergence with respect to exchange-correlation functional, temperature, or phonon stability is given; relies on refs 26 and 27.
  • domain assumption Jahn-Teller splitting is the cause of the off-center displacement.
    Interpretation carried over from prior work; not independently evidenced in this paper.
invented entities (1)
  • Low-symmetry off-center solute site for Cr, Mo, W, Mn, Tc, Re in α-Ti
    purpose: The key input configuration whose enhanced hardening is the paper's claim.
    Postulated in prior work by the same group (refs 26, 27) and assumed stable here; no direct experimental observation is provided. The paper suggests HRTEM atmosphere observation as a future test.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced solid solution hardening by off-center substitutional solute atoms in {\alpha}-Ti." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7KSDHHH

@misc{pith2026241201298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced solid solution hardening by off-center substitutional solute atoms in \alpha-Ti},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7KSDHHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01298}
}
read the original abstract

Most recently, some substitutional solute atoms in {\alpha}-Ti have been predicted to occupy unexpectedly the low-symmetry (LS) positions away from the high-symmetry (HS) lattice site, which was speculated to result in enhanced solid solution hardening (SSH). In the present work, the SSH induced by the LS off-center solute atom is evaluated within the framework of continuum elasticity theory, in comparison with that induced by its HS lattice-site counterpart. The interaction energy and force between the solute atom and the basal/prismatic edge/screw <a> dislocations in {\alpha}-Ti solid solution are calculated with the elastic dipole model, with which the strength increments induced by the solute atoms are evaluated with the Labusch model. We show that, in general, the LS solute atom interacts much more strongly with the dislocations than its HS counterpart does. The calculated interaction energies suggest that the LS solute atom forms atmosphere above/below the slip plane of the basal <a> dislocations but on the slip plane of the prismatic <a> dislocations regardless of the dislocation types (edge or screw). The strength increments caused by most of the LS solute atoms are more than an order of magnitude higher than those by their HS counterparts. The SSH effect induced by the LS solute atom is mainly determined by the strength of the Jahn-Teller splitting of the d-orbitals of the solute atom, dissimilar to that induced by HS solute atom where the atomic size mismatch dominates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01298 by the authors.

Figure 16
Figure 16. Critical resolved shear stress increments ∆𝜏LS induced by the substitutional solute atom at LS off-center site against the shape factor of the elastic dipole |𝜆1 − 𝜆2 |. The red, green, blue, and cyan symbols are respectively for the basal and prismatic plane edge and screw a dislocations (BPED, PPED, BPSD, and PPSD). The dash lines represent the linear fitting of the corresponding data points. 5. Conclusion Motiv… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gong, A.J

    J. Gong, A.J. Wilkinson, A microcantilever investigation of size effect, solid - solution strengthening and second-phase strengthening for 〈a〉 prism slip in alpha-Ti, Acta Mater. 59 (2011) 5970 –5981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.005 2011

  2. [2]

    Teodosiu, Elastic Models of Crystal Defects, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982

    C. Teodosiu, Elastic Models of Crystal Defects, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11634-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-11634-0 1982

  3. [3]

    Hull, D.J

    D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Introduction to Dislocations, Elsevier, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-64358-0

    doi:10.1016/c2009-0-64358-0 2011

  4. [4]

    Clouet, C

    E. Clouet, C. Varvenne, T. Jourdan, Elastic modeling of point -defects and their interaction, Comput. Mater. Sci. 147 (2018) 49 –63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.053

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.053 2018

  5. [5]

    Cottrell, B.A

    A.H. Cottrell, B.A. Bilby, Dislocation theory of yielding and strai n ageing of iron, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A. 62 (1949) 49 –62. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370- 1298/62/1/308

    doi:10.1088/0370- 1949

  6. [6]

    Cottrell, Theory of dislocations, Prog

    A.H. Cottrell, Theory of dislocations, Prog. Met. Phys. 1 (1949) 77 –126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0502-8205(49)90004-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0502-8205(49)90004-0 1949

  7. [7]

    Fleischer, Solution hardening, Acta Metall

    R.L. Fleischer, Solution hardening, Acta Metall. 9 (1961) 996 –1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(61)90242-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-6160(61)90242-5 1961

  8. [8]

    Labusch, A Statistical Theory of Solid Solution Hardening, Phys

    R. Labusch, A Statistical Theory of Solid Solution Hardening, Phys. Status Solidi. 41 (1970) 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19700410221

    doi:10.1002/pssb.19700410221 1970

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Leyson, W.A

    G.P.M. Leyson, W.A. Curtin, L.G. Hector, C.F. Woodward, Quantitative prediction of solute strengthening in aluminium alloys, Nat. Mater. 9 (2010) 750–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2813

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Leyson, L.G

    G.P.M. Leyson, L.G. Hector, W.A. Curtin, Solute strengthening from first principles and application to aluminum alloys, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 3873–3884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.037

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    Kwasniak, H

    P. Kwasniak, H. Garbacz, Screw dislocation mediated solution strengthening of substitutional α-Ti alloys - First principles investigation, Acta Mater. 141 (2017) 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.028

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Kwasniak, E

    P. Kwasniak, E. Clouet, Influence of simple metals on the stability of 〈a〉 basal screw dislocations in hexagonal titanium alloys, Acta Mater. 180 (2019) 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.039

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    C. Fang, J. Zhang, F. Pan, First -principles study on solute -basal dislocation interaction in Mg alloys, J. Alloys Compd. 785 (2019) 911 –917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.262

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Tsuru, M

    T. Tsuru, M. Itakura, M. Yamaguchi, C. Watanabe, H. Miura, Dislocation core structure and motion in pure titanium and titanium alloys: A first -principles study, Comput. Mater. Sci. 203 (2022) 2 –4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111081

    2022

  7. [15]

    S.I. Rao, C. Woo dward, B. Akdim, Solid solution softening and hardening in binary BCC alloys, Acta Mater. 243 (2023) 118440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118440

    2023

  8. [16]

    Frafjord, I.G

    J. Frafjord, I.G. Ringdalen, O.S. Hopperstad, R. Holmestad, J. Friis, First principle calculati ons of pressure dependent yielding in solute strengthened aluminium alloys, Comput. Mater. Sci. 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109902

    2020

  9. [17]

    Y.J. Hu, M.R. Fellinger, B.G. Bulter, Y. Wang, K.A. Darling, L.J. Kecskes, D.R. Trinkle, Z.K. Liu, Solute-induced solid-solution softening and hardening in bcc tungsten, Acta Mater. 141 (2017) 304 –316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.019

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Yasi, L.G

    J.A. Yasi, L.G. Hector, D.R. Trinkle, First -principles data for solid -solution strengthening of magnesium: From geometry and chemistry to properties, Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 5704–5713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.045

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    Hayward, C

    E. Hayward, C. Deo, B.P. Uberuaga, C.N. Tom é, The interaction of a screw dislocation with point defects in bcc iron, Philos. Mag. 92 (2012) 2759 –2778. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2012.674646

    2012

  12. [20]

    Uesugi, K

    T. Uesugi, K. Higashi, First -principles studies on lattice constants and local lattice distortions in solid solution aluminum alloys, Comput. Mater. Sci. 67 (2013) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.08.037

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    ur Rehman, K

    H. ur Rehman, K. Durst, S. Neumeier, A. Sato, R. Reed, M. G öken, On the temperature dependent strengthening of nickel by transition metal solutes, Acta Mater. 137 (2017) 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.038

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Čižek, P

    L. Čižek, P. Kratochvíl, B. Smola, Solid solution hardening of copper crystals, J. Mater. Sci. 9 (1974) 1517–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00552938

    1974 doi

  15. [23]

    Mordike, Athermal solid solution hardening in niobium alloy single crystals, Phys

    B.L. Mordike, Athermal solid solution hardening in niobium alloy single crystals, Phys. Status Solidi. 35 (1976) 303 –308. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210350132

    1976 doi

  16. [24]

    Bahador, A

    A. Bahador, A. Amrin, S. Kariya, A. Issariyapat, O. Gokcekaya, G. Zhao, J. Umeda, Y. Yang, M. Qian, K. Kondoh, Excellent tensile yield strength with ultrafine grain and tailored microstructure in plastically deformed Ti–Re alloys, J. Alloys Compd. 967 (2023) 171544. https://do...

    2023

  17. [25]

    C. Pöhl, J. Schatte, H. Leitner, Solid solution hardening of molybdenum-hafnium alloys: Experiments and Modeling, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 559 (2013) 643 –650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.004

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Q.M. Hu, R. Yang, Unconventional non-uniform local lattice distortion in dilute Ti-Mo solid solution, Acta Mater. 197 (2020) 91 –96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.033

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    S.M. Chen, Y. Gao, Z.H. Yu, B.N. Liang, S. Cao, R. Yang, Q.M. Hu, Spontaneous symmetry breaking of substitutional solute atoms in dilute α-Ti solid solutions, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7 (2023) 083605. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.083605

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Domain, C.S

    C. Domain, C.S. Becquart, J. Foct, Ab initio study of foreign interstitial atom (C, N) interactions with intrinsic point defects in α-Fe, Phys. Rev. B. 69 (2004) 144112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144112

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    Sivak, V.A

    A.B. Sivak, V.A. Romanov, V.M. Chernov, Influence of stress fields of dislocations on formation and spatial stability of point defects (elastic dipoles) in V and Fe crystals, J. Nuc l. Mater. 323 (2003) 380 –387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.014

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    Kr öner, Allgemeine Kontinuumstheorie der Versetzungen und Eigenspannungen, Arch

    E. Kr öner, Allgemeine Kontinuumstheorie der Versetzungen und Eigenspannungen, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 4 (1959) 273 –334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281393

    1959 doi

  23. [31]

    Bacon, D.M

    D.J. Bacon, D.M. Barnett, R.O. Scattergood, Anisotropic continuum theory of lattice defects, Prog. Mater. Sci. 23 (1980) 51 –262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(80)90007-9

    1980 doi

  24. [32]

    Sivak, V.A

    A.B. Sivak, V.A. Romanov, V.M. Chernov, Diffusion of self -point defects in body-centered cubic iron crystal containing dislocations, Crystallogr. Reports. 55 (2010) 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774510010153

    2010 doi

  25. [33]

    Veiga, M

    R.G.A. Veiga, M. Perez, C.S. Becquart, E. Clouet, C. Domain, Comparison of atomistic and elasticity approaches for carbon diffusion near line defects in α- iron, Acta Mater. 59 (2011) 6963 –6974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.048

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    Tapasa, Yu.N

    K. Tapasa, Yu.N. Osetsky, D.J. Bacon, Computer simulation of interaction of an edge dislocation with a carbon interstitial in α-iron and effects on glide, Acta Mater. 55 (2007) 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.015

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    Clouet, S

    E. Clouet, S. Garruchet, H. Nguyen, M. Perez, C.S. Becquart, Dislocation interaction with C in α-Fe: A comparison between atomic simulations and elasticity theory, Acta Mater. 56 (2008) 3450 –3460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.024

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    Sholl, J.A

    D.S. Sholl, J.A. Steckel, Density Functional Theory, Wiley, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470447710

    2009 doi

  29. [37]

    Q. Yu, L. Qi, T. Tsuru, R. Traylor, D. Rugg, J.W. Morris, M. Asta, D.C. Chrzan, A.M. Minor, Origin of dramatic oxygen solute strengthening effect in titanium, Science. 347 (2015) 635–639. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260485

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    Nowick, B.S

    A.S. Nowick, B.S. Berry, Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids, E lsevier,

  31. [39]

    Cochardt, G

    A.W. Cochardt, G. Schoek, H. Wiedersich, Interaction between dislocations and interstitial atoms in body-centered cubic metals, Acta Metall. 3 (1955) 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(55)90111-5

    1955 doi

  32. [40]

    Kondoh, M

    K. Kondoh, M. Fukuo, S. Kariya, K. Shitara, S. Li, A. Alhazaa, J. Umeda, Quantitative strengthening evaluation of powder metallurgy Ti–Zr binary alloys with high strength and ductility, J. Alloys Compd. 852 (2021) 156954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156954

    2021

  33. [41]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthm üller, Efficiency of ab -initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1996) 15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996 doi

  34. [42]

    Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys

    P.E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B. 50 (1994) 17953– 17979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  35. [43]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3 865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  36. [44]

    W. Zhou, R. Sahara, K. Tsuchiya, First -principles study of the phase stability and elastic properties of Ti-X alloys (X = Mo, Nb, Al, Sn, Zr, Fe, Co, and O), J. Alloys Compd. 727 (2017) 579 –595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.128

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Ikehata, N

    H. Ikehata, N. Nagasako, T. Furuta, A. Fukumoto, K. Miwa, T. Saito, First - principles calculations for development of low elastic modulus Ti alloys, Phys. Rev. B. 70 (2004) 174113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.174113

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    J. Wang, B. Shao, D. Shan, B. Guo, Y. Zong, Diffusion of hydrogen in the Volterra elastic fields around dislocations in α-Ti: Coupling DFT calculations and elasticity method, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 50 (2024) 324 –332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.258

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    Clouet, D

    E. Clouet, D. Caillard, N. Chaari, F. Onimus, D. Rodney, Dislocation locking versus easy glide in titanium and zirconium, Nat. Mater. 14 (2015) 931 –936. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4340

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    Cottrell, D.L

    A.H. Cottrell, D.L. Dext er, Dislocations and Plastic Flow in Crystals, Am. J. Phys. 22 (1954) 242–243. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1933704

    1954 doi

  41. [49]

    Mishin, J.W

    Y. Mishin, J.W. Cahn, Thermodynamics of Cottrell atmospheres tested by atomistic simulations, Acta Mater. 117 (2016) 197 –206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.013

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    Conrad, Effect of interstitial solutes on the strength and ductility of titanium, Prog

    H. Conrad, Effect of interstitial solutes on the strength and ductility of titanium, Prog. Mater. Sci. 26 (1981) 123 –403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079 - 6425(81)90001-3

    1981 doi

  43. [51]

    Snoek, Effect of small quantities of carbon and nitrogen on the elastic and plastic properties of iron, Physica

    J.L. Snoek, Effect of small quantities of carbon and nitrogen on the elastic and plastic properties of iron, Physica. 8 (1941) 711 –733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(41)90517-7

    1941 doi

  44. [52]

    Jiang, T.Y

    F.X. Jiang, T.Y. Zhang, Stress -induced long-range ordering snoek atmosphere, Scr. Metall. 22 (1988) 773–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80047- 4

    1988 doi

  45. [53]

    Schoeck, A

    G. Schoeck, A. Seeger, The flow stress of iron and its dependence on impurities, Acta Metall. 7 (1959) 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(59)90028-8

    1959 doi

  46. [54]

    Zhang, M.J

    J. Zhang, M.J. Bermingham, J. Otte, Y. Liu, Z. Hou, N. Yang, Y. Yin, M. Bayat, W. Lin, X. Huang, D.H. StJohn, M.S. Dargusch, Ultrauniform, strong, and ductile 3D-printed titanium alloy through bifunctional alloy design, Science. 383 (2024) 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1126/scie...

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Chong, M

    Y. Chong, M. Poschmann, R. Zhang, S. Zhao, M.S. Hooshmand, E. Rothchild, D.L. Olmsted, J.W. Morris, D.C. Chrzan, M. Asta, A.M. Minor, Mechanistic basis of oxygen sensitivity in titanium, Sci. Adv. 6 (2020) 1 –11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4060

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    Gong, A.J

    J. Gong, A.J. Wilkinson, Anisotropy in the plastic flow properties of single - crystal α titanium determined from micro -cantilever beams, Acta Mater. 57 (2009) 5693–5705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.064

    2009 doi

  49. [57]

    Williams, R.G

    J.C. Williams, R.G. Baggerly, N.E. Paton, Deformation behavior of HCP Ti -Al alloy single crystals, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 33 (2002) 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-002-1016-2

    2002 doi

  50. [58]

    H. Yu, S. Cao, S.S. Youssef, Y.J. M a, J.F. Lei, Y. Qi, Q.M. Hu, R. Yang, Generalized stacking fault energies and critical resolved shear stresses of random α-Ti-Al alloys from first -principles calculations, J. Alloys Compd. 850 (2021) 156314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallco...

    2021

  51. [59]

    Konchakov, V.A

    R.A. Konchakov, V.A. Khonik, N.P. Kobelev, Split interstitials in computer models of single -crystal and amorphous copper, Phys. Solid State. 57 (2015) 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783415050169

    2015 doi

  52. [1972]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-522650-9.X5001-0

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.