Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Sub-diffraction Imaging of Carrier Dynamics in Halide Perovskite Semiconductors: Effects of Passivation, Morphology, and Ion Motion

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy can image carrier recombination dynamics in halide perovskites below the optical diffraction limit by timing surface potential equilibration.

desk verdict Solid nanoscale trEFM study of 3D perovskites, but the quantitative SRV link rests on a fragile assumption and a four-point correlation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04423 v1 pith:EDJQPF3T submitted 2024-12-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Madeleine D. Breshears , Justin Pothoof , Rajiv Giridharagopal , David S. Ginger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords halideperovskitestime-resolvedelectrostaticforcemicroscopysurfacerecombinationvelocitycarrierlifetimesionmigrationpassivationsub-diffractionimagingdrift-diffusionsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy (trEFM), a scanning-probe method that senses local electrostatic forces with a vibrating cantilever, can measure how long a halide perovskite surface takes to reach electrostatic equilibrium after a step change in illumination. Across untreated films and films treated with three passivation agents, the measured equilibration time tracks the minority-carrier lifetime from time-resolved photoluminescence and correlates inversely with the surface recombination velocity computed from those decays. Because trEFM is a mechanical measurement, it carries this information at length scales far below the optical diffraction limit, where it reveals that grain boundaries equilibrate more slowly than grain interiors and that even effective passivation leaves nanoscale variations in recombination. The result matters because it gives perovskite solar-cell and LED researchers a non-destructive way to evaluate passivation uniformity and to separate electronic recombination from ion motion in the same film.

What carries the argument

The central object is the trEFM surface potential equilibration time $\tau$, obtained by demodulating the cantilever's instantaneous frequency after a ~2-ns photoexcitation step, fitting the frequency transient, and calibrating the time-to-first-peak against a simulated cantilever response to extract a cantilever-independent $\tau$. The physical mechanism is the approach of photogenerated carrier populations to a new equilibrium: the surface potential follows carrier redistribution, so the equilibration time is set by the generation–recombination balance, with surface recombination velocity the dominant surface term, plus a slower contribution from mobile ions. A one-dimensional drift-diffusion model that couples charge-carrier transport with ion-vacancy motion provides the quantitative link between $\tau$, surface recombination velocity, and mobile-ion concentration that the experiments are compared against.

What would settle it

A reader could settle the claim by measuring trEFM equilibration times on films whose surface recombination velocity is varied independently of bulk recombination (for example, by changing surface treatment while keeping the same precursor batch and thickness), and checking whether the inverse log-linear correlation with the trPL-derived SRV reappears when the bulk lifetime, diffusion coefficient, and thickness are measured rather than assumed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that trEFM probes the surface potential equilibration time in halide perovskite films, and that this time constant reports on the same recombination physics captured by time-resolved photoluminescence. The paper shows that slower equilibration times follow surface passivation with APTMS, AEAPTMS, and PEAI, matching the ranking of trPL lifetimes and PLQY improvements; plotting trEFM time constants against surface recombination velocities derived from trPL gives a strong inverse linear trend in log-SRV with Pearson $r = -0.91$. Drift-diffusion simulations with coupled electronic and ionic carrier dynamics reproduce the experimental timescales: lowering surface recombination velocity slows equilibration, while raising mobile-ion concentration also slows it. The authors conclude that trEFM measures local carrier equilibration as controlled by surface recombination and mobile ions, and that this makes trEFM a predictive, sub-diffraction-limited probe of carrier recombination dynamics and passivation heterogeneity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the surface recombination velocities used in the correlation are correct: they are computed from photoluminescence decays using assumed values for the bulk lifetime (8000 ns), carrier diffusion coefficient (0.75 cm2/s), and film thickness (500 nm), and if those assumptions are wrong for these films the correlation could weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • trEFM equilibration times can serve as a nanoscale proxy for surface recombination velocity, allowing passivation treatments to be ranked locally rather than by film-averaged photoluminescence.
  • Grain boundaries in unpassivated mixed-cation, mixed-halide films will show slower surface potential equilibration than grain interiors, and this contrast can be reduced or eliminated by background illumination that screens mobile ions and charge traps.
  • Excitation wavelength tunes the depth profile of carrier generation, so redder illumination weights surface recombination more heavily; comparing wavelengths separates surface from bulk contributions.
  • Because the measurement is mechanical, it applies to films with grains of order 100 nm or smaller, below the visible diffraction limit, without the sample damage associated with electron-beam probes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The background-illumination results imply a testable protocol: imaging under strong bias light should isolate electronic recombination contrast, while imaging at low bias should emphasize ion-motion heterogeneity; the paper does not state this as an operational recipe.
  • If the correlation between $\tau$ and surface recombination velocity is robust, the same cantilever-based approach could be extended to other mixed electronic/ionic conductors, such as organic semiconductors and battery-relevant oxides, to map local recombination and ion accumulation below the diffraction limit.
  • The depth sensitivity suggested by the wavelength dependence hints that combining multiple excitation wavelengths could reconstruct approximate depth profiles of surface recombination velocity in thin films, a tomographic extension the authors do not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy (trEFM) measurements on halide perovskite half-stacks, comparing nanoscale surface-potential equilibration times with spatially averaged time-resolved photoluminescence lifetimes and derived surface recombination velocities (SRV). The authors show a large-area correlation between trEFM equilibration times and confocal PL intensity, a sample-level correlation between trEFM times and PL lifetimes, and an inverse log-linear correlation between trEFM times and SRV computed from trPL. They further image nanoscale heterogeneity in passivated and unpassivated films, observe slower grain-boundary dynamics, and use 1D IonMonger drift-diffusion simulations to argue that lower SRV and higher mobile-ion concentrations slow the surface potential equilibration. The central claim is that trEFM probes dynamics directly related to SRV and carrier lifetimes, enabling sub-diffraction imaging of recombination and ion-motion-related heterogeneity.

Significance. If the quantitative correlation between trEFM equilibration times and SRV is robust, this work offers a nondestructive, sub-diffraction probe of passivation quality and local recombination in modern halide perovskites. The paper's strengths include the direct correlated trEFM/confocal-PL map (r = 0.88), the use of open-source analysis code (FFTA) and an open simulator (IonMonger), and the attempt to separate electronic and ionic contributions through wavelength-, intensity-, and bias-illumination-dependent experiments. The claim is significant because existing nanoscale carrier-dynamics probes (e.g., cathodoluminescence) are often destructive, whereas trEFM is mechanical and non-destructive. However, the quantitative SRV axis of the central correlation rests on a single assumed bulk lifetime, and the paper's own supplementary data contain inconsistencies that must be resolved before the quantitative claims are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Note 3, Eq. (5); Fig. 2b] The SRV values in Fig. 2b are not direct measurements but are derived from trPL via Eq. (5), tau_surf = (1/tau_eff - 1/tau_bulk)^-1, using a fixed assumed bulk lifetime tau_bulk = 8000 ns, diffusion coefficient D = 0.75 cm^2/s, and thickness W = 500 nm. For the longest-lived APTMS samples, the average trPL lifetimes from Supplementary Table 4 at the fluences relevant to the main-text measurements are about 3-4 us, a substantial fraction of the assumed tau_bulk. The conversion is highly nonlinear in this regime: if tau_bulk were 3 us instead of 8 us, tau_surf would become negative and SRV undefined for the passivated samples, which are precisely the points that anchor the high-lifetime end of Fig. 2b. Because this transformation defines the x-axis of the central correlation (Pearson r = -0.91, p = 0.013, four points), the authors must demonstrate that the correlation is robust to a physically reasonable range of tau_bulk (e.g., 3-10 us) or provide a direct determination of tau_bulk for these films. As written, the quantitative claim that trEFM time constants are predictive of local SRV is not fully supported.
  2. [Main text, passivation results; Supplementary Tables 1 and 4] The main text states that APTMS, AEAPTMS, and PEAI treatments produce 18x, 2x, and 2x improvements in carrier lifetime, respectively, citing the half-stack trPL data. The supplementary tables do not support these factors. For APTMS, at fluences near the quoted 30 nJ/cm^2 condition (about 5e10 photons/cm^2), Supplementary Table 4 gives control tau_C = 566 ns, beta = 0.54 (average lifetime ~1.0 us) and APTMS tau_C = 2483 ns, beta = 0.57 (average lifetime ~4.0 us), i.e., roughly a 4x improvement, not 18x. For AEAPTMS and PEAI, Supplementary Table 1 gives average-lifetime ratios of ~2x relative to their respective controls. This discrepancy must be corrected or explained; if the 18x figure refers to a different metric, excitation condition, or a different sample set, that should be stated explicitly, since the magnitude of passivation improvement is used to interpret the trEFM trends.
  3. [Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (6); Fig. 3c,d] The manuscript attributes slower grain-boundary equilibration times to higher local mobile-ion concentrations and states that simulations with higher N0 produce slower surface potential equilibration. However, Eq. (6) in Supplementary Note 4 yields ion-migration timescales of minutes (or longer) for the parameters in Supplementary Table 3, while the trEFM and simulated dynamics are on the microsecond scale. The mechanism by which a static or nearly static mobile-ion background slows the microsecond carrier equilibration is not explained; the claim that 'slow ion motion contributes to microsecond dynamics' appears internally inconsistent. The authors should clarify whether the simulated N0 dependence is a static space-charge effect on the carrier redistribution process (through Poisson's equation) and should demonstrate explicitly that the experimental grain-boundary contrast cannot be explained solely by local variations in SRV or trap-mediated carrier dynamics.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Fig. 2b] The Pearson correlation coefficient (0.88) and p-value (0.018) are reported, but the number of correlated points is not stated; please include n in the caption or text.
  2. [Fig. 2a and Supplementary Note 3] The figure legend describes SRV as 'approximated'; please state explicitly in the main text that the SRV values are not directly measured but derived under the assumptions in Supplementary Note 3, and consider adding a sensitivity analysis or error bars reflecting the assumed tau_bulk range.
  3. [Methods, trEFM excitation] The excitation protocol states that the laser is turned off at t = 7 ms within a 16 ms window; the text should clarify whether the extracted trEFM time constants reflect the turn-on transient or the turn-off transient, since the interpretation in the paper focuses on the rise of the frequency shift after excitation.
  4. [Throughout] The phrase 'surface potential equilibration time' is used interchangeably with 'trEFM time constant'; consider defining the exact fitted quantity (e.g., time-to-first-peak after calibration) once in the main text to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: trEFM and trPL/SRV are independent measurements; SRV-axis assumptions are a correctness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central quantitative claim is the correlation between trEFM time constants and SRV derived from trPL (Fig. 2b). The trEFM tau values are obtained from an independent cantilever calibration (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1) that uses only cantilever mechanics and a defined exponential perturbation; no trPL lifetime or SRV value enters that calibration. The SRV values in Fig. 2b are computed from independent trPL decays via Eqs. 4-5 in Supplementary Note 3, and the trPL and trEFM measurements are separate experiments on separate instruments. A monotonic transform of the trPL lifetime axis (tau_eff to SRV) does not make the correlation circular, because the trEFM variable is not fitted to or derived from that axis. The assumption tau_bulk = 8000 ns, D = 0.75 cm2/s, and W = 500 nm in the SRV calculation is a parameter-sensitivity and correctness concern, and it could indeed be fragile for long-lifetime passivated samples, but it is not a case of the prediction being equivalent to its input. The paper also relies on the authors' prior trEFM methodology (refs 48-49 and the publicly available FFTA code), but that is external, code-released methodology with published benchmarks, not an unverified conclusion imported to force the result. The IonMonger simulations use literature parameters (Supplementary Table 3) and are not fitted to the trEFM data; the intensity- and wavelength-dependent tests are additional independent checks. No equation in the paper reduces to its input by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The stated limitations that the simulations are qualitative and not full 3D further support a cautious, non-circular interpretation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on calibration, interpretation of trEFM signal, and assumed material parameters for SRV extraction; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • bulk carrier lifetime (tau_bulk) = 8000 ns
    Assumed in Supplementary Note 3 to extract SRV from trPL effective lifetimes; taken from previous literature (Jariwala et al., Wang et al.).
  • carrier diffusion coefficient (D) = 0.75 cm2/s
    Assumed in Supplementary Note 3 for SRV calculation; from literature for halide perovskites.
  • film thickness (W) = 500 nm
    Perovskite thickness used in SRV calculation; matches sample preparation but not independently verified in this paper.
  • mobile ion concentration (N0) in simulations = 1e13 to 1e17 cm-3
    Swept over literature range in IonMonger simulations; specific values in Fig. 5b are chosen to reproduce the experimental grain boundary vs. interior contrast.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The cantilever frequency response can be modeled as a damped driven harmonic oscillator, and the calibration simulation maps time-to-first-peak to sample time constant.
    Supplementary Note 1; if the model is wrong, all reported tau values are systematically biased.
  • domain assumption The surface potential equilibration time measured by trEFM reflects carrier recombination dynamics and mobile ion concentration at the local surface.
    Central interpretational premise; supports the correlation with PL lifetime and SRV.
  • domain assumption Carrier generation equals recombination rate at equilibrium (G=R), with recombination described by SRH and bimolecular terms.
    Supplementary Note 4, Equations 7-8; used to argue lower SRV leads to slower equilibration.
  • ad hoc to paper Ion migration is slow (minutes) and does not directly contribute to microsecond surface potential dynamics, but higher mobile ion concentration slows equilibration through Poisson's equation coupling.
    Supplementary Note 4; the timescale argument is used to justify neglecting direct ion motion, while concentration still modulates the electric field and carrier dynamics. This dual role is not fully resolved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sub-diffraction Imaging of Carrier Dynamics in Halide Perovskite Semiconductors: Effects of Passivation, Morphology, and Ion Motion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EDJQPF3T

@misc{pith2026241204423,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sub-diffraction Imaging of Carrier Dynamics in Halide Perovskite Semiconductors: Effects of Passivation, Morphology, and Ion Motion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EDJQPF3T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04423}
}
read the original abstract

We spatially resolve photocarrier dynamics in halide perovskites using time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy (trEFM) to map surface potential equilibration during photoexcitation. Following treatment with different surface passivation agents, we show that trEFM probes dynamics directly related to surface recombination velocity and carrier lifetimes correlated with time-resolved photoluminescence. Our results reveal nanoscale variations in recombination dynamics following surface passivation. We also observe heterogeneity in surface potential equilibration times dependent on perovskite film morphology. We combine wavelength- and intensity-dependent measurements with drift-diffusion simulations to disentangle the influence of carrier recombination and ion migration on surface potential equilibration. These results demonstrate that we can use mechanical detection to image electronic carrier recombination dynamics in perovskites below the optical diffraction limit while also showing the potential for future improvements in heterogeneity of surface passivation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04423 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. trEFM measures photoinduced dynamics that correlate to PL metrics of interest [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Output Convolutional Neural Network for Improved Parameter Extraction in Time-Resolved Electrostatic Force Microscopy Data

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-branch CNN fed with the trEFM frequency trace and cantilever parameters extracts bi-exponential kinetic parameters (τ1, τ2, A) more accurately and noise-robustly than the prior single-exponential neural network.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M., Chu, J

    Zhang, H., Pfeifer, L., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Chu, J. & Grätzel, M. Tailoring passivators for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Nat. Rev. Chem. 7, 632–652 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Stranks, S. D. & Snaith, H. J. Metal-halide perovskites for photovoltaic and light-emitting devices. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 391–402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Li, M. et al. Acceleration of radiative recombination for efficient perovskite LEDs. Nature 630, 631–635 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    & Huang, J

    Wei, H. & Huang, J. Halide lead perovskites for ionizing radiation detection. Nat. Commun. 10, 1066 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Nguyen, H. A. et al. Design Rules for Obtaining Narrow Luminescence from Semiconductors Made in Solution. Chem. Rev. 123, 7890–7952 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    E., Horantner, M

    Eperon, G. E., Horantner, M. T. & Snaith, H. J. Metal halide perovskite tandem and multiple-junction photovoltaics. Nat. Rev. 1, 0095 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Dequilettes, D. W. et al. Photoluminescence Lifetimes Exceeding 8 μs and Quantum Yields Exceeding 30% in Hybrid Perovskite Thin Films by Ligand Passivation. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 438–444 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    DeQuilettes, D. W. et al. Impact of microstructure on local carrier lifetime in perovskite solar cells. Science 348, 683–686 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Jariwala, S. et al. Local Crystal Misorientation Influences Non-radiative Recombination in Halide Perovskites. Joule 3, 3048–3060 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    & Petrozza, A

    Kim, G.-W. & Petrozza, A. Defect Tolerance and Intolerance in Metal-Halide Perovskites

  3. [11]

    Defects in Perovskite Solar Cells: Efficiency versus Stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2001959 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    De Keersmaecker, M., Tirado, J., Armstrong, N. R. & Ratcliff, E. L. Defect Quantification in Metal Halide Perovskites Anticipates Photoluminescence and Photovoltaic Performance. ACS Energy Lett 9, 243–252 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Dequilettes, D. W. et al. Reduced recombination via tunable surface fields in perovskite thin films. Nat Energy 9, 457–466 (2024)

    2024

  6. [15]

    Lin, Y . H. et al. Bandgap-universal passivation enables stable perovskite solar cells with low photovoltage loss. Science 384, 767–775 (2024)

    2024

  7. [18]

    Rigter, S. A. et al. Passivation Properties and Formation Mechanism of Amorphous Halide Perovskite Thin Films. Adv. Func. Mater. 31, 2010330 (2021)

    2021

  8. [19]

    & Ginger, D

    Akrami, F., Jiang, F., Giridharagopal, R. & Ginger, D. S. Kinetic Suppression of Photoinduced Halide Migration in Wide Bandgap Perovskites via Surface Passivation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 14, 9310–9315 (2023)

    2023

  9. [20]

    Pothoof, J., Westbrook, R. J. E., Giridharagopal, R., Breshears, M. D. & Ginger, D. S. Surface Passivation Suppresses Local Ion Motion in Halide Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 14, 6092–6098 (2023)

    2023

  10. [21]

    Jiang, F. et al. Scanning Kelvin Probe Microscopy Reveals That Ion Motion Varies with Dimensionality in 2D Halide Perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 100–108 (2021)

    2021

  11. [22]

    McGovern, L. et al. Reduced Barrier for Ion Migration in Mixed-Halide Perovskites. ACS Appl Energy Mater 4, 13431–13437 (2021)

    2021

  12. [23]

    Liu, Y . et al. Direct Observation of Photoinduced Ion Migration in Lead Halide Perovskites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008777 (2020)

    2020

  13. [24]

    Jiang, F. et al. Improved reverse bias stability in p-i-n perovskite solar cells with optimized hole transport materials and less reactive electrodes. Nat. Energy 9, 1275–1284 (2024)

    2024

  14. [25]

    Weber, S. A. L. et al. How the formation of interfacial charge causes hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2404–2413 (2018)

    2018

  15. [26]

    Liu, J. et al. Correlations between Electrochemical Ion Migration and Anomalous Device Behaviors in Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1003–1014 (2021)

    2021

  16. [27]

    Jones, T. W. et al. Lattice strain causes non-radiative losses in halide perovskites. Energy Environ Sci 12, 596–606 (2019)

    2019

  17. [28]

    M., S Doherty, T

    Tennyson, E. M., S Doherty, T. A. & Stranks, S. D. Heterogeneity at multiple length scales in halide perovskite semiconductors. Nat. Rev. 4, 573–587 (2019)

    2019

  18. [29]

    Frohna, K. et al. The impact of interfacial quality and nanoscale performance disorder on the stability of alloyed perovskite solar cells. Nat Energy (2024) doi:10.1038/s41560-024- 01660-1

    2024 doi

  19. [30]

    & Stranks, S

    Delport, G., Macpherson, S. & Stranks, S. D. Imaging Carrier Transport Properties in Halide Perovskites using Time-Resolved Optical Microscopy. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903814 (2020)

    2020

  20. [31]

    Giridharagopal, R., Cox, P. A. & Ginger, D. S. Functional Scanning Probe Imaging of Nanostructured Solar Energy Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1769–1776 (2016)

    2016

  21. [32]

    Giridharagopal, R. et al. Time-Resolved Electrical Scanning Probe Microscopy of Layered Perovskites Reveals Spatial Variations in Photoinduced Ionic and Electronic Carrier Motion. ACS Nano 13, 2812–2821 (2019)

    2019

  22. [33]

    & Moseley, J

    Guthrey, H. & Moseley, J. A Review and Perspective on Cathodoluminescence Analysis of Halide Perovskites. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903840 (2020)

    2020

  23. [34]

    M., Jen, A

    Zhou, Y ., Herz, L. M., Jen, A. K.-Y . & Saliba, M. Advances and challenges in understanding the microscopic structure–property–performance relationship in perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 7, 794–807 (2022)

    2022

  24. [35]

    Tennyson, E. M. et al. Correlated Electrical and Chemical Nanoscale Properties in Potassium‐Passivated, Triple‐Cation Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. Interaces 7, 2000515 (2020)

    2020

  25. [36]

    Collins, S. D. et al. Observing Ion Motion in Conjugated Polyelectrolytes with Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy. Adv Electron Mater 3, 1700005 (2017)

    2017

  26. [38]

    Yuan, Y . et al. Shallow defects and variable photoluminescence decay times up to 280 µs in triple-cation perovskites. Nature Materials | 23, 391–397 (2024)

    2024

  27. [39]

    Xiong, S. et al. Reducing nonradiative recombination for highly efficient inverted perovskite solar cells via a synergistic bimolecular interface. Nat. Commun. 15, 5607 (2024)

    2024

  28. [40]

    Zhao, K. et al. peri-Fused polyaromatic molecular contacts for perovskite solar cells. Nature 632, 301–306 (2024)

    2024

  29. [41]

    Rehman, W. et al. Photovoltaic mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskites: links between crystallinity, photo-stability and electronic properties. Energy Environ. Sci 10, 361–369 (2017)

    2017

  30. [42]

    G., Sanehira, E

    Bischak, C. G., Sanehira, E. M., Precht, J. T., Luther, J. M. & Ginsberg, N. S. Heterogeneous Charge Carrier Dynamics in Organic−Inorganic Hybrid Materials: Nanoscale Lateral and Depth-Dependent Variation of Recombination Rates in Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskite Thin Fil...

    2015

  31. [43]

    P., Harrell, L

    Dwyer, R. P., Harrell, L. E. & Marohn, J. A. Lagrangian and Impedance-Spectroscopy Treatments of Electric Force Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 64020–64052 (2019)

    2019

  32. [45]

    R., Grütter, P., Horne, D

    Albrecht, T. R., Grütter, P., Horne, D. & Rugar, D. Frequency modulation detection using high-Q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 668–673 (1991)

    1991

  33. [46]

    & Grütter, P

    Miyahara, Y ., Cockins, L. & Grütter, P. Electrostatic Force Microscopy Characterization of Low Dimensional Systems. in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (eds. Sadewasser, A. & Glatzel, T.) vol. 48 177–199 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg)

  34. [47]

    Collins, L. et al. Breaking the Time Barrier in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy: Fast Free Force Reconstruction Using the G-Mode Platform. ACS Nano 11, 8717–8729 (2017)

    2017

  35. [48]

    Coffey, D. C. & Ginger, D. S. Time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy of polymer solar cells. Nat. Mater. 5, 735–740 (2006)

    2006

  36. [51]

    Cox, P. A. et al. Imaging Charge Transfer State Excitations in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells with Time-Resolved Electrostatic Force Microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2852– 2858 (2015)

    2015

  37. [52]

    G., Rayermann, G

    Reid, O. G., Rayermann, G. E., Coffey, D. C. & Ginger, D. S. Imaging Local Trap Formation in Conjugated Polymer Solar Cells: A Comparison of Time-Resolved Electrostatic Force Microscopy and Scanning Kelvin Probe Imagin. J. Phys. Chem. C. 114, 20672–20677 (2010)

    2010

  38. [53]

    E., Smith, E

    Shao, G., Rayermann, G. E., Smith, E. M. & Ginger, D. S. Morphology-Dependent Trap Formation in Bulk Heterojunction Photodiodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 4654–4660 (2013)

    2013

  39. [54]

    D., Giridharagopal, R., Pothoof, J

    Breshears, M. D., Giridharagopal, R., Pothoof, J. & Ginger, D. S. A Robust Neural Network for Extracting Dynamics from Electrostatic Force Microscopy Data. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 4342–4350 (2022)

    2022

  40. [55]

    Teale, S., Degani, M., Chen, B., Sargent, E. H. & Grancini, G. Molecular cation and low- dimensional perovskite surface passivation in perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 9, 779– 792 (2024)

    2024

  41. [57]

    Thornton, S. T. & Marion, J. B. Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems. in Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems 100–117 (Thomsom Brooks/Cole, 2004)

    2004

  42. [58]

    Taddei, M. et al. Ethylenediamine Addition Improves Performance and Suppresses Phase Instabilities in Mixed-Halide Perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 4265–4273 (2022)

    2022

  43. [59]

    Xu, J. et al. Triple-halide wide–band gap perovskites with suppressed phase segregation for efficient tandems. Science 367, 1097–1104 (2020)

    2020

  44. [60]

    Wang, R. et al. Constructive molecular configurations for surface-defect passivation of perovskite photovoltaics. Science 366, 1509–1513 (2019)

    2019

  45. [61]

    Johnston, M. B. & Herz, L. M. Hybrid Perovskites for Photovoltaics: Charge-Carrier Recombination, Diffusion, and Radiative Efficiencies. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 146–154 (2016)

    2016

  46. [71]

    time -to-first-peak

    Mcgovern, L. et al. Reduced Barrier for Ion Migration in Mixed-Halide Perovskites. Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 13431–13437 (2021). 1 Supplementary Information Sub-diffraction-limited Imaging of Carrier Dynamics in Halide Perovskite Semiconductors: Effects of Passivation, Morphology...

    2021

  47. [72]

    Giridharagopal, R. et al. Submicrosecond time resolution atomic force microscopy for probing nanoscale dynamics. Nano Lett. 12, 893–898 (2012)

    2012

  48. [73]

    U., Harrison, J

    Karatay, D. U., Harrison, J. S., Glaz, M. S., Giridharagopal, R. & Ginger, D. S. Fast time- resolved electrostatic force microscopy: Achieving sub-cycle time resolution. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 053702 (2016)

    2016

  49. [74]

    M., Dwyer, R

    Tirmzi, A. M., Dwyer, R. P., Jiang, F. & Marohn, J. A. Light-Dependent Impedance Spectra and Transient Photoconductivity in a Ruddlesden-Popper 2D Lead-Halide Perovskite Revealed by Electrical Scanned Probe Microscopy and Accompanying Theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 13639–13648 (2020)

    2020

  50. [75]

    E., Giridharagopal, R., Ginger, D

    Shea, D. E., Giridharagopal, R., Ginger, D. S., Brunton, S. L. & Kutz, J. N. Extraction of Instantaneous Frequencies and Amplitudes in Nonstationary Time-Series Data. IEEE Access 9, 83453–83466 (2021)

    2021

  51. [76]

    M., Marohn, J

    Yazdanian, S. M., Marohn, J. A. & Loring, R. F. Dielectric fluctuations in force microscopy: Noncontact friction and frequency jitter. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 224706 (2008)

    2008

  52. [77]

    Rajiv Giridharagopal. FFTA. GitHub repository, https://github.com/rajgiriUW/ffta (2021)

    2021

  53. [78]

    Taddei, M. et al. Interpreting Halide Perovskite Semiconductor Photoluminescence Kinetics. ACS Energy Lett. 9, 2508–2516 (2024)

    2024

  54. [79]

    Jiang, Q. et al. Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells. Nat. Photonics 13, 460–466 (2019)

    2019

  55. [80]

    Jariwala, S. et al. Reducing surface recombination velocity of methylammonium-free mixed-cation mixed-halide perovskites via surface passivation. Chem. Mater. 33, 5035– 5044 (2021)

    2021

  56. [81]

    Wang, J. et al. Reducing Surface Recombination Velocities at the Electrical Contacts Will Improve Perovskite Photovoltaics. ACS Energy Lett. 14, 222–227 (2019)

    2019

  57. [82]

    E., Cave, · J M, Walker, · A B, Richardson, · G & Foster, · J M

    Courtier, N. E., Cave, · J M, Walker, · A B, Richardson, · G & Foster, · J M. IonMonger: a free and fast planar perovskite solar cell simulator with coupled ion vacancy and charge carrier dynamics. J Comput Electron 18, 1435–1449 (2019)

    2019

  58. [83]

    E., Richardson, G

    Courtier, N. E., Richardson, G. & Foster, J. M. A fast and robust numerical scheme for solving models of charge carrier transport and ion vacancy motion in perovskite solar cells. Appl. Math. Model. 63, 329–348 (2018)

    2018

  59. [84]

    E., Cave, J

    Courtier, N. E., Cave, J. M., Foster, J. M., Walker, A. B. & Richardson, G. How transport layer properties affect perovskite solar cell performance: insights from a coupled charge transport/ion migration model. Energy Environ. Sci 12, 396–409 (2019)

    2019

  60. [85]

    Lin, Y . H. et al. Bandgap-universal passivation enables stable perovskite solar cells with low photovoltage loss. Science 384, 767–775 (2024). 31

    2024

  61. [86]

    Riquelme, A. J. et al. Understanding equivalent circuits in perovskite solar cells. Insights from drift-diffusion simulation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 24, 15657 (2022)

    2022

  62. [87]

    & Du, M.-H

    Yang, D., Ming, W., Shi, H., Zhang, L. & Du, M.-H. Fast Diffusion of Native Defects and Impurities in Perovskite Solar Cell Material CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3. 28, 4349–4357 (2016)

    2016

  63. [88]

    Peng, W. et al. Quantification of Ionic Diffusion in Lead Halide Perovskite Single Crystals. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1477–1481 (2018)

    2018

  64. [89]

    Futscher, M. H. et al. Quantification of ion migration in CH3NH3PbI 3 perovskite solar cells by transient capacitance measurements. Mater. Horiz. 6, 1497–1503 (2019)

    2019

  65. [90]

    Mcgovern, L. et al. Reduced Barrier for Ion Migration in Mixed-Halide Perovskites. Appl. Energy Mater. 4, 13431–13437 (2021)

    2021

  66. [91]

    Yun, J. S. et al. Critical Role of Grain Boundaries for Ion Migration in Formamidinium and Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600330 (2016)

    2016

  67. [92]

    & Kirchartz, T

    Siekmann, J., Ravishankar, S. & Kirchartz, T. Apparent Defect Densities in Halide Perovskite Thin Films and Single Crystals. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 3244–3251 (2021)

    2021

  68. [93]

    Eames, C. et al. Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7497 (2015)

    2015

  69. [94]

    & Weber, K

    Wu, N., Walter, D., Fell, A., Wu, Y . & Weber, K. The Impact of Mobile Ions on the Steady-State Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 219–229 (2020)

    2020

  70. [95]

    Bertoluzzi, L. et al. Mobile Ion Concentration Measurement and Open-Access Band Diagram Simulation Platform for Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Joule 4, 109–127

  71. [96]

    & Jin, S

    Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Tian, W. & Jin, S. Carrier Transport in Lead Halide Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 22868–22879 (2023)

    2023

  72. [97]

    Shi, Y . et al. (3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane Surface Passivation Improves Perovskite Solar Cell Performance by Reducing Surface Recombination Velocity. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 4081–4088 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.