Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 24 references

A dynamical study of Hilda asteroids in the Circular and Elliptic RTBP

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hilda asteroids are best defined by their two in-plane frequencies in the Sun-Jupiter circular restricted three-body problem, not by a box of two-body orbital elements.

desk verdict Solid tori computations for Hilda asteroids, but the frequency-based classification claim is tested only on the orbital-element-selected sample it claims to beat. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07700 v1 pith:OC42EXB4 submitted 2024-12-10 math.DS math-phmath.MP

Àngel Jorba , Begoña Nicolás , Óscar Rodríguez This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath-phmath.MP MSC 37N0570F0770F15
keywords Hildaasteroidsrestrictedthree-bodyproblemquasi-periodicinvarianttoriPoincarésectionfrequencyanalysis3:2mean-motionresonanceJacobiconstantasteroidclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the Hilda asteroids, traditionally defined by a box of two-body orbital elements (semi-major axis between 3.7 and 4.2 AU, eccentricity below 0.3, inclination below 20 degrees), are better understood as a single dynamical object in the planar Sun-Jupiter circular restricted three-body problem. It finds a family of stable periodic orbits surrounded by islands of two-dimensional quasi-periodic motion, and shows that observed Hilda asteroids sit inside these islands, each tracing a closed curve in a suitable Poincaré section. The two dominant frequencies of that quasi-periodic motion lie in a narrow band near 0.5, and the same picture survives in the planar elliptic problem where Jupiter's eccentricity is included. If this is right, Hilda membership is a robust dynamical property of the Sun-Jupiter system, measurable by two frequencies, and the standard orbital-element classification can misassign boundary asteroids.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the family of stable periodic orbits around the Sun in the planar CRTBP, parameterized by Jacobi constant $C\in[2.98,3.06]$, which acts as the skeleton of the Hilda group. Around each such orbit lies a Cantor family of two-dimensional invariant tori, a nearly continuous stack of tori with exponentially small gaps at resonances; their intersection with the section $\Sigma$ is an invariant curve $\varphi(\theta)$ satisfying $P_C(\varphi(\theta))=\varphi(\theta+\rho)$, computed as a truncated Fourier series by a Newton method. In the ERTBP, the central tool is the stroboscopic map taken at true anomaly $f=2\pi k$, whose invariant curves represent two-dimensional tori of the flow, with rotation number fixed by the CRTBP period through $\rho=2\pi\omega/\omega_e=4\pi^2/T$, and whose stability is decided by the generalized eigenvalue problem for $D_xP(\varphi(\theta))\psi(\theta)=\lambda\Gamma_\rho\psi(\theta)$. Frequency analysis, using a Hanning-windowed discrete Fourier transform followed by collocation, extracts the two dominant frequencies and verifies that all other frequencies are integer combinations of them; the Thick-Poincaré Section Plot then lets the whole group of asteroids be compared by narrow ranges of $C$ without computing one section plot per asteroid.

What would settle it

Take the full set of current Hilda candidates, propagate each in a three-dimensional model that includes Jupiter's eccentricity, and compare each object's two in-plane frequencies with the island boundaries found here: if any object whose planar frequencies sit inside the island escapes over a few million years, or if any object outside the island with in-island planar frequencies persists indefinitely, the criterion fails. A cheaper targeted check is to take a high-inclination member, with inclination near 20 degrees, and see whether its vertical motion moves its fundamental frequencies by more than the island's observed frequency width.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Hilda group occupies one coherent dynamical region rather than a box of orbital elements: a family of stable periodic orbits around the Sun in the planar Sun-Jupiter CRTBP, each surrounded by a Cantor family of two-dimensional invariant tori. For a fixed Jacobi constant $C$, the Poincaré section $\Sigma=\{y=0,\dot y<0\}$ shows each asteroid's trajectory as a single closed invariant curve, with neighboring curves forming concentric islands separated by a chaotic sea. The two fundamental frequencies of these tori are close to $0.5$, consistent with the underlying $4\pi$ periodic orbit, and they vary only in a narrow range along the family; resonances appear as chains of islands and as horizontal segments or jumps in the frequency plot. Repeating the analysis in the planar ERTBP, where Jupiter's eccentricity acts as a $2\pi$-periodic perturbation, turns the periodic orbits into two-dimensional tori and the two-dimensional tori into three-dimensional tori, with essentially the same two main frequencies. The authors conclude that membership in the Hilda class is better decided by these frequencies in the planar CRTBP than by two-body orbital elements.

Load-bearing premise

The entire classification hangs on using only the flat, in-plane motion: asteroids with orbits tilted up to 20 degrees are projected onto the plane, and the paper does not quantify how much that projection shifts the frequencies or the size of the island.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hilda membership becomes a dynamical statement about the Sun-Jupiter system: an asteroid belongs if its planar CRTBP trajectory lies on a closed curve in the Poincaré section at its Jacobi constant, inside the stable island.
  • The orbital-element box (3.7–4.2 AU, eccentricity below 0.3, inclination below 20 degrees) can misclassify boundary objects, and the frequency criterion removes the epoch dependence of those cuts.
  • Jupiter's eccentricity does not destroy the island: the ERTBP retains the same families as higher-dimensional tori with the same two main frequencies plus the forcing frequency 1, so the CRTBP result is robust to the main perturbation.
  • The two dominant frequencies of a Hilda asteroid sit close to approximately (0.505, 0.456) in the planar CRTBP, near the $4\pi$ periodic orbit, giving an objective numerical signature for membership.
  • Resonances inside the island show up as chains of islands and as flats or jumps in the frequency plot, so the frequency analysis can separate asteroids trapped on resonant chains from those on regular quasi-periodic motion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A practical classifier could be built from the island's frequency boundaries: integrate a candidate in the planar CRTBP, extract its two dominant frequencies, and accept it as Hilda only if the pair falls inside the measured island; this would assign boundary objects like (164903) or (210340) unambiguously.
  • The frequency table's integer-combination checks, with residuals near $10^{-15}$ in the CRTBP and $10^{-14}$ in the ERTBP, suggest the quasi-periodic description is numerically sharp; the same tool could look for slow diffusion by testing whether the two frequencies drift over integrations longer than the $2^{20}$ time units used here.
  • If the planar criterion is adopted, high-inclination Hildas are the stress test: the vertical degree of freedom adds a third frequency, and the paper's plan to extend to three dimensions implies the planar island boundaries may move once inclinations are included.
  • The same machinery should transfer to other resonant asteroid groups, such as the 2:1 resonance or the Trojans, since the method only requires a stable periodic family and the surrounding tori.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes the Hilda asteroid group in the planar Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem (CRTBP) and the planar Elliptic RTBP (ERTBP). It numerically computes a family of stable periodic orbits in the CRTBP and, using Poincaré sections and frequency analysis, shows that six representative Hilda asteroids are surrounded by islands of two-dimensional quasi-periodic invariant tori. In the ERTBP, the same asteroids appear to lie on three-dimensional tori, with the Jupiter eccentricity adding a frequency equal to 1. The authors propose that membership in the Hilda class should be decided by the two dominant frequencies in the planar CRTBP rather than by two-body orbital elements.

Significance. The paper's dynamical machinery is careful and the confinement result for the preselected Hilda sample is credible: frequency combinations are checked at the 10^-14 level (Table I), the Taylor integration is run with local threshold 10^-16, and the CRTBP/ERTBP comparison is internally consistent. If limited to the statement that the orbital-element-defined Hilda sample lies in islands of quasi-periodic motion, the contribution is solid and relevant to the dynamical classification of asteroids. However, the abstract's stronger claim that the planar CRTBP frequencies are a better membership criterion than two-body elements is not supported by the experiments: the sample is preselected by the two-body element box, there is no control population, and no decision boundary is given. The paper itself notes in the Conclusions that a three-dimensional model is essential for high-inclination members, which further limits the planar frequency criterion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section I.C, Section III.B, Abstract] The comparative classification claim is not tested. The Hilda sample used throughout the paper is selected in Section I.C using the two-body orbital-element box (3.7–4.2 AU, eccentricity below 0.3, inclination below 20°) taken from Zellner et al., and the six representative asteroids and the T-PSP groups of 40–50 asteroids per Jacobi-constant range in Section III.B are drawn from this preselected set. The paper therefore shows that most orbital-element-defined Hildas lie on or near two-dimensional tori, but it does not show that planar CRTBP frequencies separate Hildas from non-Hildas. No control population is integrated (no near-boundary objects, no asteroids with similar a, e, i outside the 3:2 resonance), no false-positive/false-negative rates are reported, and no operational decision boundary in (ω1, ω2) is provided. The abstract's claim that frequencies are 'much better' than two-body elements requires a comparative test on a mixed sample.
  2. [Appendix A, Section III.B] The quasi-periodicity acceptance criterion is under-specified. Appendix A states that when the frequency-analysis output 'match[es] the input data' the motion is accepted as quasi-periodic, and that asteroids whose trajectories collide with the Sun or Jupiter are discarded as not quasi-periodic, but it does not report the number or fraction of discarded candidates in the T-PSP groups or in the full sample. Without this count, the conclusion that the Hilda group is 'confined' in an island of two-dimensional quasi-periodic solutions cannot be quantitatively assessed. Please give the tolerance used for the acceptance test and the fraction of discarded asteroids per group.
  3. [Section II, Conclusions] The planar projection is applied to asteroids with inclinations up to 20°, and the Conclusions explicitly state that 'Some asteroids exhibit significant inclinations, making it essential to incorporate a three-dimensional model into our analysis.' Since the proposed membership criterion is based on planar CRTBP frequencies, the effect of out-of-plane motion on the two dominant frequencies and on the island boundaries is unquantified; high-inclination members could be misclassified. Provide a quantitative estimate, for example by comparing the planar frequencies with the projection of a full three-dimensional integration for several high-inclination Hildas.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV.B] In the discussion of the invariant relation (7), the statement that 'the integral term can be taken as zero' is correct only at the initial section f=0, not at f=2π; please clarify that the evaluation is made at f=0.
  2. [Section III (Figure 3)] The text and caption use 'medium value' where 'median value' is meant (the figure uses Q1, Q2, Q3 and the interquartile range).
  3. [Section I.C] The epoch description is confusing: the coordinates are downloaded at MJD 59800 and must be propagated backwards to the chosen date MJD 58914; the phrase 'up to the date of interest' suggests forward propagation.
  4. [Figures 10, 15, 16] There are typos in captions: 'Analougous' in Figure 10 and 'collumn' in Figures 15 and 16.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

ERTBP validation family is seeded by the asteroids themselves, making the Section IV.B frequency overlay a construction; the central CRTBP result remains independent.

  1. self definitional [Section IV B, 'Three-dimensional quasi-periodic solutions' (pages 13-14), procedure for the double section Σ0]
    "Given the curve for one asteroid in the double section Σ0, C takes a slightly different value for each point in the curve, taking the minimum value at the right cross of the axis x (x′ = 0). Then, we use that point to find the two-dimensional invariant tori satisfying Equation (15) with that value of C at f = 0, y = 0, x′ = 0. Once we have that point, new initial conditions are generated in the double section along the axis x (x′ = 0), by increasing x and modifying y′ such that C value remains."

    The 'family' of 3D tori in the ERTBP is generated by starting from a double-section point belonging to the asteroid's own trajectory. The first invariant curve therefore contains the asteroid's orbit, and the horizontal black frequency lines in Figures 15-16 are overlaid at exactly the seed point. The match between the asteroid's two main frequencies and the family frequency curves at that point is thus enforced by construction rather than discovered independently. The independent content is limited to the continuation to neighbouring tori and the small variation of frequencies across the family; the claim that the asteroid itself lies on those frequency curves is not an independent test.

full rationale

The main CRTBP analysis (Section III) is self-contained: invariant curves are obtained by solving the invariance condition (14) with a Newton method, and the asteroid frequencies are measured by independent integrations with the Taylor method followed by frequency analysis; the overlay of the asteroid's closed curve on the PSP family is a genuine comparison, not a fit. The orbital-element preselection of the sample does not by itself force the conclusion, because the PSP/T-PSP could have revealed chaotic or resonant behaviour; the observed closed curves are a real result. The strongest overclaim — that planar CRTBP frequencies are better than two-body elements for deciding Hilda membership — is under-supported: no control population is tested, no decision boundary is given, and Appendix A discards colliding asteroids without reporting the discarded fraction. However, under-support is an evidence gap, not circularity. The one genuinely circular leg is the ERTBP family in Section IV B, where the family is anchored at the asteroid's own double-section point, so the frequency overlay at the seed is a construction. Because the central CRTBP claim and the CRTBP↔ERTBP frequency comparison retain independent content, the overall circularity is moderate rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on modeling assumptions (planarity, Keplerian primaries, KAM persistence) and on numerical heuristics (frequency analysis acceptance), rather than on fitted parameters or invented entities. The two hand-picked numerical choices (epoch and interpolation tolerance) do not change the qualitative conclusions but affect the precise computed values.

free parameters (2)
  • Epoch MJD 58914 for coordinate transformation = 58914 (6 March 2020)
    Chosen by hand so that the Sun-Jupiter distance is close to its mean value; affects all asteroid initial conditions and hence the computed frequencies.
  • Double-section interpolation tolerance delta = 1e-5 to 1e-4
    Used to define the y=0 cut in Poincare double sections; a numerical parameter, not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Planar CRTBP/ERTBP adequately describe Hilda resonant dynamics; out-of-plane motion can be neglected for classification.
    The entire analysis projects asteroids to the xy-plane and uses planar equations; Section I C admits inclinations up to 20 degrees, and Section V says a 3D model is needed for significant inclinations.
  • domain assumption Sun and Jupiter follow Keplerian ellipses after the initial epoch, so the angular momentum derivative is zero and the coordinate transformation is valid.
    Section II A: 'from that time on, Sun and Jupiter will move on ellipses... angular momentum is conserved, being its derivative zero.' This removes the other planets and asteroid perturbations.
  • domain assumption KAM persistence and non-resonance conditions hold for the tori families under the eccentricity perturbation.
    Section IV relies on the persistence of lower-dimensional tori from Jorba-Villanueva to justify that CRTBP periodic orbits become 2D tori in the ERTBP.
  • ad hoc to paper The frequency-analysis acceptance criterion certifies quasi-periodicity.
    Appendix A: 'If the output of the algorithm is a set of frequencies and amplitudes that match the input data, we accept that the motion is quasi-periodic.' This is a numerical heuristic, not a mathematical proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A dynamical study of Hilda asteroids in the Circular and Elliptic RTBP." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OC42EXB4

@misc{pith2026241207700,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A dynamical study of Hilda asteroids in the Circular and Elliptic RTBP},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OC42EXB4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07700}
}
read the original abstract

The Hilda group is a set of asteroids whose mean motion is in a 3:2 orbital resonance with Jupiter. In this paper we use the planar Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem (CRTBP) as a dynamical model and we show that there exists a family of stable periodic orbits that are surrounded by islands of quasi-periodic motions. We have computed the frequencies of these quasi-periodic motions and we have shown how the Hilda family fits inside these islands. We have compared these results with the ones obtained using the Elliptic Restricted Three-Body Problem and they are similar, showing the suitability of the CRTBP model. It turns out that, to decide if a given asteroid belongs to the Hilda class, it is much better to look at its frequencies in the planar CRTBP rather than to use two-body orbital elements as it is commonly done today.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07700 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sun-Jupiter system and its five equilibrium points. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution in time of the Jacobi constant for Hilda asteroids [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. FIG. 6. Trajectories of six different asteroids. From left to right: first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left, surface composed by a continuum of periodic orbits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Poincaré Section Plots (PSP) at the energy level of the six [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Thick-Poincaré Section Plots (T-PSP) for Hilda-type aster [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. First row left, PSP at the energy level of asteroid (153) Hilda. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Analougous representation as in the first row of Figure 9 for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Top left, 2D invariant tori of the ERTBP for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Left, positions of (1911) Schubart asteroid trajectory in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Left, positions of (153) Hilda asteroid trajectory in temporal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Left column, double sections plots generated using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Left column, double sections plots generated using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Schubart ,\ title title Long-period effects in the motion of Hilda-type planets , \ 10.1086/110605 journal journal Astron

    author author J. Schubart ,\ title title Long-period effects in the motion of Hilda-type planets , \ 10.1086/110605 journal journal Astron. J. \ volume 73 ,\ pages 99--103 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1086/110605 1968

  2. [2]

    Schubart ,\ title title Three characteristic parameters of orbits of Hilda-type asteroids , \ @noop journal journal Astron

    author author J. Schubart ,\ title title Three characteristic parameters of orbits of Hilda-type asteroids , \ @noop journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 200--204 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Morbidelli \ and\ author M

    author author A. Morbidelli \ and\ author M. Moons ,\ title title Secular resonances in mean motion commensurabilities: The 2/1 and 3/2 cases , \ https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1993.1052 journal journal Icarus \ volume 102 ,\ pages 316--332 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    Ferraz-Mello ,\ 10.1007/978-3-031-45816-3 title Chaotic Dynamics in Planetary Systems (Springer Praxis Books) \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author S. Ferraz-Mello ,\ 10.1007/978-3-031-45816-3 title Chaotic Dynamics in Planetary Systems (Springer Praxis Books) \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45816-3 2024

  5. [5]

    Jorba \ and\ author J

    author author \`A . Jorba \ and\ author J. Villanueva ,\ title title On the normal behaviour of partially elliptic lower dimensional tori of H amiltonian systems , \ 10.1088/0951-7715/10/4/001 journal journal Nonlinearity \ volume 10 ,\ pages 783--822 ( year 1997 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0951-7715/10/4/001

  6. [6]

    Szebehely ,\ @noop title Theory of Orbits \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 1967 ) NoStop

    author author V. Szebehely ,\ @noop title Theory of Orbits \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 1967 ) NoStop

    work page 1967

  7. [7]

    Zellner , author A

    author author B. Zellner , author A. Thirunagari , \ and\ author D. Bender ,\ title title The large-scale structure of the asteroid belt , \ 10.1016/0019-1035(85)90190-3 journal journal Icarus \ volume 62 ,\ pages 505--511 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(85)90190-3

  8. [8]

    Jorba \ and\ author B

    author author \`A . Jorba \ and\ author B. Nicolás ,\ title title Transport and invariant manifolds near L _3 in the E arth- M oon B icircular model , \ 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105327 journal journal Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 105327 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2020

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    G \'o mez , author J

    author author G. G \'o mez , author J. Llibre , author R. Martínez , \ and\ author C. Sim \'o ,\ @noop title Station keeping of libration point orbits , \ type ESOC Contract 5648/83/ D / JS(SC) , final report \ ( institution European Space Agency ,\ year 1985 )\ note reprinted...

    1985

  2. [10]

    G \'o mez , author \`A

    author author G. G \'o mez , author \`A . Jorba , author J. Masdemont , \ and\ author C. Sim \'o ,\ @noop title Study refinement of semi-analytical H alo orbit theory , \ type ESOC Contract 8625/89/ D / MD(SC) , final report \ ( institution European Space Agency ,\ year 1991 )...

    1991

  3. [11]

    Jorba \ and\ author B

    author author \`A . Jorba \ and\ author B. Nicolás ,\ title title Using invariant manifolds to capture an asteroid near the L _3 point of the E arth- M oon B icircular model , \ 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105948 journal journal Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. \ volume 102 ,\ pa...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Jorba \ and\ author J

    author author \`A . Jorba \ and\ author J. Villanueva ,\ title title On the persistence of lower dimensional invariant tori under quasi-periodic perturbations , \ 10.1007/s003329900036 journal journal J. Nonlinear Sci. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 427--473 ( year 1997 b ) NoStop

    doi

  5. [13]

    Castell \`a \ and\ author \`A

    author author E. Castell \`a \ and\ author \`A . Jorba ,\ title title On the vertical families of two-dimensional tori near the triangular points of the B icircular problem , \ 10.1023/A:1008321605028 journal journal Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 35--54...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author \`A . Jorba ,\ title title Numerical computation of the normal behaviour of invariant curves of n -dimensional maps , \ 10.1088/0951-7715/14/5/303 journal journal Nonlinearity \ volume 14 ,\ pages 943--976 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [15]

    Gabern \ and\ author \`A

    author author F. Gabern \ and\ author \`A . Jorba ,\ title title Generalizing the R estricted T hree- B ody P roblem. T he B ianular and T ricircular C oherent P roblems , \ 10.1051/0004-6361:20035799 journal journal Astron. Astrophys. \ volume 420 ,\ pages 751--762 ( year 200...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author C. Sim\'o ,\ title title Effective computations in celestial mechanics and astrodynamics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Modern Methods of Analytical Mechanics and their Applications ,\ series CISM Courses and Lectures , Vol.\ volume 387 ,\ editor edited by\ editor V. Ru...

    1998

  9. [17]

    Broer , author H

    author author H. Broer , author H. Han mann , author A. Jorba , author J. Villanueva , \ and\ author F. Wagener ,\ title title Normal-internal resonances in quasiperiodically forced oscillators: a conservative approach , \ @noop journal journal Nonlinearity \ volume 16 ,\ page...

    2003

  10. [18]

    G \'o mez , author J

    author author G. G \'o mez , author J. M. \ Mondelo , \ and\ author C. Sim \'o ,\ title title A collocation method for the numerical fourier analysis of quasi-periodic functions. i: Numerical tests and examples , \ 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.41 journal journal Discrete Contin. Dyn....

    doi

  11. [19]

    G \'o mez , author J

    author author G. G \'o mez , author J. M. \ Mondelo , \ and\ author C. Sim \'o ,\ title title A collocation method for the numerical fourier analysis of quasi-periodic functions. ii: Analytical error estimates , \ 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.75 journal journal Discrete Contin. Dyn. ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author J. Laskar ,\ title title The chaotic motion of the solar system: A numerical estimate of the size of the chaotic zones , \ 10.1016/0019-1035(90)90084-M journal journal Icarus \ volume 88 ,\ pages 266--291 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Laskar ,\ title title Frequency analysis of a dynamical system , \ 10.1007/BF00699731 journal journal Celestial Mech

    author author J. Laskar ,\ title title Frequency analysis of a dynamical system , \ 10.1007/BF00699731 journal journal Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. \ volume 56 ,\ pages 191–196 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  14. [22]

    author author J. Laskar ,\ title title Introduction to frequency map analysis , \ in\ 10.1007/978-94-011-4673-9_13 booktitle Hamiltonian Systems with Three or More Degrees of Freedom ,\ editor edited by\ editor C. Sim\'o \ ( publisher Springer Netherlands ,\ address Dordrecht ...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Mondelo ,\ title Contribution to the Study of Fourier Methods for Quasi–Periodic Functions and the Vicinity of the Collinear Libration Points ,\ @noop Ph.D

    author author J. Mondelo ,\ title Contribution to the Study of Fourier Methods for Quasi–Periodic Functions and the Vicinity of the Collinear Libration Points ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school U niversitat de B arcelona ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  16. [24]

    Jorba \ and\ author M

    author author \`A . Jorba \ and\ author M. Zou ,\ title title A software package for the numerical integration of ODE s by means of high-order T aylor methods , \ 10.1080/10586458.2005.10128904 journal journal Exp. Math. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 99--117 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.