pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.09988 · v1 · pith:QADVYKLKnew · submitted 2024-12-13 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

AI and the Future of Digital Public Squares

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI
keywords publicdigitalllmssquaressystemsfutureopportunitiesparadigm
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Two substantial technological advances have reshaped the public square in recent decades: first with the advent of the internet and second with the recent introduction of large language models (LLMs). LLMs offer opportunities for a paradigm shift towards more decentralized, participatory online spaces that can be used to facilitate deliberative dialogues at scale, but also create risks of exacerbating societal schisms. Here, we explore four applications of LLMs to improve digital public squares: collective dialogue systems, bridging systems, community moderation, and proof-of-humanity systems. Building on the input from over 70 civil society experts and technologists, we argue that LLMs both afford promising opportunities to shift the paradigm for conversations at scale and pose distinct risks for digital public squares. We lay out an agenda for future research and investments in AI that will strengthen digital public squares and safeguard against potential misuses of AI.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Visualizing "We the People": Bridging the Perception Gap through Pluralistic Data Storytelling

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An AI-enabled platform creates interactive opinion landscapes from a 2025 national deliberation to highlight nuance, consensus, and shared values on freedom and equality instead of simplified group conflicts.

  2. Visualizing "We the People": Bridging the Perception Gap through Pluralistic Data Storytelling

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper presents a case study of an AI-enabled deliberation with 2,400 Americans that produced interactive opinion landscapes to reveal consensus and reduce perceptual gaps.