Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Long-lived multilevel coherences and spin-1 dynamics encoded in the rotational states of ultracold molecules

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ultracold molecules in a single magic-wavelength tweezer keep three rotational-state superpositions coherent for over a second, encoding a spin-1 system and enabling multiparameter estimation.

desk verdict Solid magic-wavelength spectroscopy and a real three-level demonstration, but the 'second-scale coherence' headline overreaches the data: the >1.5 s estimate drops their own magnetic noise. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15088 v2 pith:GNLMGDOE submitted 2024-12-19 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Tom R. Hepworth , Daniel K. Ruttley , Fritz von Gierke , Philip D. Gregory , Alexander Guttridge , Simon L. Cornish This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords ultracoldpolarmoleculesrotationalcoherencemagic-wavelengthopticaltweezersRamseyspectroscopyspin-1qutritmultiparameterquantumestimationACStarkshiftsRbCs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the rotational structure of ultracold polar molecules can be used as a multi-level coherent resource, not just two-level qubits, by engineering optical tweezers that are simultaneously near-magic for several rotational transitions. Its central experimental result is that with the tweezer polarisation parallel to the quantisation axis, the magic detunings for the superpositions $(0,0)$--$(1,1)$, $(1,1)$--$(2,2)$, and $(0,0)$--$(2,2)$ lie within roughly 200 MHz, so one trap detuning near 185.26 GHz gives expected coherence times above 1.5 s for all three at once. High-contrast Ramsey fringes at 500 ms demonstrate this simultaneous second-scale coherence. The paper then encodes a spin-1 system in the three rotational states and uses a generalised three-level Ramsey sequence to perform quantum multiparameter estimation, extracting two microwave detunings with Hz-level precision. It also predicts, with modest noise improvements, that second-scale coherence should extend to ten rotational states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the polarisability decomposition $\alpha_N(\Delta,\beta) = \tilde\alpha_N^{(0)}(\Delta) + \tilde\alpha_N^{(2)}(\Delta) C_N P_2(\cos\beta)$, expressing each stretched rotational state's polarisability as a scalar part plus a tensor part whose coefficient $C_N = -N/(2N+3)$ depends on the rotational quantum number. Because the rotational constants of the ground and $b^3\Pi$ manifolds differ, the scalar and tensor parts both depend on $N$, so the magic detuning where $\alpha_N = \alpha_{N'}$ is different for every pair. The argument then exploits the geometric factor $P_2(\cos\beta)$: at $\beta=0$ the tensor contribution is maximised, so the compensating magic detunings for different $N$ stay close together, whereas at $\beta=90^\circ$ they spread apart and hyperpolarisability appears. This mechanism is what allows one detuning to be nearly magic for many transitions simultaneously.

What would settle it

Measure the magic detunings for transitions involving $N=3,4,\ldots,10$ stretched states at $\beta=0$ with the same Ramsey technique and compare them to Eq. (2); if they deviate from the model by more than the fitted uncertainty, or if the minimum $T_2^*$ over all pairs at 0.1% intensity noise falls below about 0.9 s, the ten-state scalability claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with RbCs molecules in optical tweezers and polarisation parallel to the quantisation axis, the authors measure, by Hz-level Ramsey spectroscopy, the magic detuning of each transition as the point where the transition frequency is independent of trap intensity. They find that the magic detunings for $(0,0)$--$(1,1)$, $(1,1)$--$(2,2)$, and $(0,0)$--$(2,2)$ cluster in a window about 200 MHz wide (185.2980, 185.142, and 185.239 GHz), unlike the orthogonal polarisation case where they are far apart. Operating at a common detuning, they observe close-to-unity Ramsey contrast at 500 ms on all three superpositions simultaneously. They prepare an equal superposition of the three states as a spin-1 system and analyse the resulting three-level interference pattern to extract detunings $\delta_{01} = 98.11(2)$ Hz and $\delta_{12} = -149.51(2)$ Hz, with a quantum Fisher information matrix showing that a single three-level measurement achieves the same variance bound as two two-level Ramsey measurements using $3/4$ of the repetitions. Extrapolating their two-parameter polarisability model to $N$ up to 10, they predict that with 0.1% relative intensity noise the minimum $T_2^*$ over all stretched-state pairs can reach about 0.9 s.

Load-bearing premise

The second-scale and ten-state coherence projections assume the measured intensity noise and an upper bound on laser-frequency noise, and assume the two-parameter polarisability model stays accurate up to $N=10$; if the true frequency noise exceeds the bound or the model degrades at high $N$, the coherence claims would weaken substantially.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single magic-wavelength setting can serve many rotational transitions at once, so multilevel coherence no longer requires state-by-state trap tuning.
  • The demonstrated spin-1 encoding gives a platform for qutrit-based quantum information and interaction-driven physics such as SU(N) magnetism or synthetic dimensions.
  • Three-level Ramsey estimation reaches the same parameter variance as two two-level Ramsey measurements with $3/4$ the experimental repetitions, reducing data-acquisition cost for multilevel spectroscopy.
  • If the polarisability model holds to $N=10$ and trap noise is reduced to 0.1%, second-scale simultaneous coherence across ten rotational states is within reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the magic-detuning clustering at $\beta=0$ is not specific to RbCs; the same scalar/tensor compensation mechanism should appear in other bialkali molecules whose $b^3\Pi$ vibrational poles tune the parallel polarisability, so the technique may transfer directly.
  • Editorial inference: the $3/4$ measurement advantage for two parameters suggests that larger symmetric superpositions of $N$ rotational states could yield a scaling advantage in multiparameter estimation, a claim the paper does not make.
  • Editorial inference: a direct test would be to measure the magic detuning for transitions involving $N=3$ to $N=10$ pairs; if the model's predicted clustering fails there, the ten-state projection would need revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports precision Ramsey spectroscopy of rotational transitions of 87Rb133Cs molecules held in optical tweezers operating near the magic wavelength of the 1145.3 nm trap. The authors measure magic detunings and sensitivity constants for the (0,0)-(1,1), (1,1)-(2,2), and (0,0)-(2,2) superpositions for tweezer polarizations both parallel (β=0°) and orthogonal (β=90°) to the quantisation axis. They find that for β=0° the magic detunings are clustered within about 200 MHz, allowing a single trap detuning near 185.26 GHz to yield simultaneously long predicted coherence times. They observe high-contrast Ramsey fringes at 500 ms for all three superpositions, encode a spin-1 (qutrit) system in the rotational states, demonstrate a three-level generalized Ramsey sequence for multiparameter estimation, and use a two-parameter polarisability model to predict that second-scale coherence of ten rotational states should be achievable with reduced intensity noise. The core experimental measurements are carefully executed, with nested-sampling fits and quoted 1σ uncertainties, and the data are made available.

Significance. If the second-scale coherence claims hold, this is an important advance for the cold-molecules and quantum-information community: it provides a practical route to simultaneous multilevel rotational coherence, enables spin-1 encodings in molecules, and demonstrates a multiparameter estimation scheme with a quantum Fisher information advantage. The paper's methodology is a strength: nested-sampling Monte Carlo fits, explicit 1σ error bars, transparent model parameters, and a data availability link. The measurement of the polarisation dependence of the magic wavelength and the identification of the β=0° clustering are likely to be broadly useful. The ten-state prediction is clearly labelled as a prediction rather than a demonstration, which is appropriate. However, two load-bearing quantitative issues need to be resolved before the central claims are fully supported: an internal inconsistency in the reported two-photon sensitivity constant, and the basis for the specific 'exceeds 1.5 s' coherence-time statement.

major comments (2)
  1. [Table I and Results ('Simultaneous second-scale coherence')] The reported β=0° sensitivity constant for the (0,0)-(2,2) transition, k=184(11) mHz MHz^{-1} (kW cm^{-2})^{-1}, is inconsistent with the sum of the one-photon constants k_{01}=98(3) and k_{12}=38(2), which gives 136(4). Because the differential polarisability for the two-photon transition is the sum of the two one-photon differential polarisabilities, the sensitivity constants should add; the β=90° entries in the same table indeed satisfy this (-63(4) ≈ -43(2) - 18(3)). The 4σ discrepancy for β=0° suggests a typographical error or an unaccounted systematic effect in at least one of the three fits. This is load-bearing because the (0,0)-(2,2) transition is the most sensitive at the common detuning and therefore sets the achievable common T2*. Please re-examine the fits, correct the table, and update all downstream T2* estimates and the Fig. 3(a) model accordingly.
  2. [Results ('Simultaneous second-scale coherence') and Methods ('Limitations to two-state coherence')] The statement that at Δ≈185.26 GHz the T2* time for each superposition exceeds 1.5 s is not supported when the measured magnetic-field noise is included. Using the reported values for the (0,0)-(2,2) transition (k=184 mHz MHz^{-1} (kW cm^{-2})^{-1}, I=4.6 kW/cm^2, σI/I=0.65%, σΔ=80 kHz, Δ-Δmagic≈21 MHz) gives an optical contribution σ_opt≈134 mHz; adding the stated magnetic noise of about 10 mG (sensitivity 9.45 Hz/G) gives σ_total≈164 mHz and T2*≈1.37 s. Moreover, the 500 ms fringes in Fig. 3(b) demonstrate high contrast but not the decay time itself; the >1.5 s figure is an extrapolation from the Gaussian noise model. I recommend either measuring the contrast decay out to T>1 s or revising the text (including the abstract's 'demonstrate simultaneous second-scale coherence') to 'projected'/'expected', with the magnetic-noise contribution stated explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'demonstrating the ultility of the spin-1 coherence' contains a typo; it should read 'utility'.
  2. [Methods ('Three-level Ramsey sequence')] The word 'peform' should be 'perform' in the sentence 'After this hold time, we peform a sequence of π/2 pulses.'
  3. [Results and Methods] The relative intensity noise is quoted as 0.65(4)% in the Results and Fig. 3 caption, but as 0.65(5)% in the Methods; please harmonize these values and state which one was used in the T2* calculations.
  4. [Methods (Eq. (1) fits for β=90°)] For the β=90° fits, the detuning Δiso is fixed to values informed by the β=0° measurements and Ref. [31]; this constraint should be discussed as a source of systematic uncertainty in the extracted k' and Δmagic values.
  5. [Discussion and Abstract] The phrase 'readily achievable' for the ten-state second-scale coherence prediction is stronger than the evidence, which relies on an assumed intensity-noise improvement to 0.1% and on model extrapolation beyond N=2; 'potentially achievable' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: magic detunings are measured directly by Ramsey spectroscopy; multilevel and ten-state extrapolations use a separately constrained polarisability model, and self-citations are background rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central quantitative outputs of the paper, namely the magic detunings Δmagic and sensitivity constants k for the (0,0)-(1,1), (1,1)-(2,2), and (0,0)-(2,2) transitions, are obtained by fitting measured Ramsey transition frequencies f(I,Δ) to Eq. (1), an empirical expansion in intensity and detuning. These values do not presuppose the polarisability model. The model in Eq. (2) is a reformulation of Guan et al. [30] with two free parameters (Bv′ and α∥^bkgd) fit to those measured values; using it to compute magic detunings and T2* for transitions up to N=10 is a genuine extrapolation to states outside the fitted set, not a restatement of the inputs. The simultaneous-coherence statement that T2* exceeds 1.5 s is an expectation from the measured noise model and is labelled as such; the direct demonstration at T ≈ 500 ms is the actual measured claim. Possible over-optimism in the noise budget, such as omission of magnetic-field noise in the ten-state projection, is a correctness concern rather than circularity. Self-citations such as Refs. [21], [30], [31], and [35] provide apparatus, previous coherence demonstrations, or a theory framework, but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or to forbid alternatives, and the paper's quantitative claims rest on its own Ramsey measurements. The model-input constants from the unpublished Ref. [36] are shared spectroscopy results; their reliability is a reproducibility issue, but they are not the target of the paper's derivation. No load-bearing circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small number of fitted parameters, primarily Bv' and alpha_parallel^bkgd for the polarisability model and a fitted intensity-noise value for the coherence estimate. The ten-state prediction additionally assumes improved intensity noise. No new physical entities are introduced. Most background assumptions are standard physical models, clearly flagged in the text.

free parameters (5)
  • Bv' (effective rotational constant of b3Pi0, v'=0) = 518.0(4) MHz
    Fitted to the measured magic detunings and sensitivity constants through Eq. (2). It controls the rotational-state dependence of the model used for the ten-state prediction.
  • alpha_parallel background polarisability (alpha_parallel^bkgd) = 134.4(8) Hz (W cm^-2)^-1
    Fitted jointly with Bv' to the same magic-detuning and sensitivity data. Together with the measured alpha_perp^bkgd, it sets the scalar-tensor balance in the extrapolated model.
  • Tweezer relative intensity noise sigma_I/I = 0.65(5)%
    A single free parameter fitted to the contrast-versus-detuning curves in Fig. 3(a). This value is used with the frequency-noise bound to estimate T2* at the common detuning.
  • Hyperpolarisability coefficients for beta=90 degrees, k'*(Delta_magic - Delta_iso)^2 = 25(2), -580(50), 26(2) mHz (kW cm^-2)^-2
    Fitted for the three transitions at beta=90 after fixing Delta_iso to values informed by beta=0 measurements and Ref. [31]. These are peripheral to the central beta=0 multilevel result.
  • Assumed improved relative intensity noise for Fig. 5 = 0.1%
    Taken from Ref. [45] as a projected improvement, not measured in this experiment. The ten-state second-scale coherence prediction depends directly on this assumption.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gaussian dephasing model: Ramsey contrast decays as C(T) = exp(-(T/T2*)^2) with T2* = sqrt(2)/(2 pi sigma)
    Used to convert frequency noise into coherence times. This is a standard model referenced to Ref. [63] in Methods.
  • domain assumption The polarisability decomposition of Eq. (2) with fixed ground-state rotational constants and vibrational linewidths from prior spectroscopy
    Reformulated from Guan et al. [30]; the model is used to predict magic detunings for unmeasured rotational superpositions up to N=10.
  • domain assumption Tweezer intensity noise and frequency noise are independent and add in quadrature to the transition-frequency noise
    Methods 'Limitations to two-state coherence'; this is the basis for the T2* estimates at and away from the magic detuning.
  • ad hoc to paper For beta=90 degrees, Delta_iso is fixed to 185.47, 185.53, and 185.60 GHz for the three transitions when fitting k'
    The paper states there is insufficient data to fit both Delta_iso and k' simultaneously; the fixed values are informed by beta=0 measurements and Ref. [31]. This affects the beta=90 comparison, not the central beta=0 result.
  • domain assumption Tweezer frequency noise sigma_Delta is bounded by 80(20) kHz from a beat-note measurement
    This upper bound is used to estimate T2* at exact magic detuning and in the Fig. 5 calculations. If the true noise were larger, the predicted coherence times would be shorter.
  • domain assumption Molecule loss during readout is state-independent and postselection does not bias relative populations
    Methods 'Experimental apparatus'; required for interpreting the measured populations and contrasts as unbiased estimators of the molecular state distribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-lived multilevel coherences and spin-1 dynamics encoded in the rotational states of ultracold molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GNLMGDOE

@misc{pith2026241215088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-lived multilevel coherences and spin-1 dynamics encoded in the rotational states of ultracold molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GNLMGDOE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15088}
}
read the original abstract

Rotational states of ultracold polar molecules possess long radiative lifetimes, microwave-domain coupling, and tunable dipolar interactions. The availability of numerous rotational states has inspired many proposed applications, including simulations of quantum magnetism, encodings of information in high-dimensional qudits, and synthetic dimensions with many synthetic lattice sites. Many of these applications are yet to be realised, primarily because engineering long-lived coherent superpositions of multiple rotational states is highly challenging. Here, we investigate how multilevel coherences between rotational states can be engineered by using optical tweezer traps operating close to a magic wavelength for a given pair of states. By performing precision Ramsey spectroscopy we find the exact magic wavelengths and sensitivities to detuning errors for multiple rotational state superpositions. We find that, for a trap polarised parallel to the quantisation axis, the magic wavelengths are closely clustered enabling long-lived coherence across multiple rotational states simultaneously. As an example, we demonstrate simultaneous second-scale coherence between three rotational states. Utilising this extended coherence, we perform multiparameter estimation using a generalised Ramsey sequence and demonstrate coherent spin-1 dynamics encoded in the rotational states. With modest experimental improvements, we predict that second-scale coherent dynamics of ten rotational states should be readily achievable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (c) where we replot the same measurements as a function of I. Here, the fitted grey dashed lines high￾light points with the same ∆ to demonstrate the linear relationship between f and I and the points at ∆magic correspond to the horizontal line. From the fit to the measurements in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (b) to constrain two unknown constants related to the molecular structure that are embedded in the terms for α˜ (0) N (∆) and α˜ (2) N (∆) (see Methods). The results are shown by the solid lines for β = 0° and the dashed lines for β = 90°. The agreement between the model and the measurements is excellent. Moreover, having established the parameters in the model, we are able to predict the magic detunings and sensiti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. , we can prepare highly coherent quantum super￾positions of three rotational states, effectively encoding a spin-1 system in the rotational structure of the molecule. Pushing beyond the usual two-level paradigm will open many new applications in quantum science using ultra￾cold molecules [1]. As a first demonstration of such an ap￾plication, we use the dynamics of a spin-1 system encoded in the rotational structure … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical analysis of multivariate planar curves and applications to X-ray classification

    stat.ME 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces multivariate planar curve analysis with a solved alignment problem, then classifies segmented X-rays for cardiomegaly via tangent projections and functional classifiers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ul- tracold molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Barnett, D

    R. Barnett, D. Petrov, M. Lukin, and E. Demler, Quan- tum magnetism with multicomponent dipolar molecules in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 190401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    A.V.Gorshkov, S.R.Manmana, G.Chen, J.Ye, E.Dem- ler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Tunable superfluidity and quantum magnetism with ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 115301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    K. R. A. Hazzard, S. R. Manmana, M. Foss-Feig, and A. M. Rey, Far-from-equilibrium quantum magnetism with ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 075301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Mukherjee, J

    B. Mukherjee, J. M. Hutson, and K. R. A. Hazzard, SU(N) magnetism with ultracold molecules, New Jour- nal of Physics27, 013013 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Sundar, B

    B. Sundar, B. Gadway, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Synthetic dimensions in ultracold polar molecules, Sci. Rep.8, 3422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Sundar, M

    B. Sundar, M. Thibodeau, Z. Wang, B. Gadway, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Strings of ultracold molecules in a synthetic dimension, Phys. Rev. A99, 013624 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    C. Feng, H. Manetsch, V. G. Rousseau, K. R. A. Haz- zard, and R. Scalettar, Quantum membrane phases in synthetic lattices of cold molecules or Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A105, 063320 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Cohen, M

    M. Cohen, M. Casebolt, Y. Zhang, K. R. A. Hazzard, and R. Scalettar, Classical analog of quantum models in synthetic dimensions, Phys. Rev. A109, 013303 (2024). 11

    2024

  3. [11]

    V. V. Albert, J. P. Covey, and J. Preskill, Robust encod- ing of a qubit in a molecule, Phys. Rev. X10, 031050 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Sawant, J

    R. Sawant, J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cornish, Ultracold polar molecules as qudits, New J. Phys.22, 013027 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. A. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules, Nature501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    J.-R. Li, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, W. G. Tobias, J. S. Higgins, and J. Ye, Tunable itinerant spin dynamics with polar molecules, Nature614, 70 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules, Nature614, 64 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebret- sadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Entangle- ment and iSWAP gate between molecular qubits, Nature 637, 821–826 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic- wavelengthopticaltweezers,Nature 637,827–832(2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Rev.175, 453 (1968)

    U.HaeberlenandJ.S.Waugh,Coherentaveragingeffects in magnetic resonance, Phys. Rev.175, 453 (1968)

    1968

  15. [23]

    Viola and E

    L. Viola and E. Knill, Robust dynamical decoupling of quantum systems with bounded controls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 037901 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    X. Yuan, Y. Li, M. Zhang, C. Liu, M. Zhu, X. Qin, N. V. Vitanov, Y. Lin, and J. Du, Preserving multilevel quan- tum coherence by dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022412 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    A. H. da Silva, R. d. J. Napolitano, F. F. Fanchini, and B. Bellomo, Time-dependent Rabi frequencies to protect quantum operations on an atomic qutrit by continuous dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A109, 032611 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Burchesky, L

    S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W.Ketterle, K.-K.Ni,andJ.M.Doyle,Rotationalcoher- ence times of polar molecules in optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 123202 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    A. J. Park, L. R. B. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, J. T. Zhang, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Extended rotational coher- ence of polar molecules in an elliptically polarized trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 183401 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Seeßelberg, X.-Y

    F. Seeßelberg, X.-Y. Luo, M. Li, R. Bause, S. Ko- tochigova, I. Bloch, and C. Gohle, Extending rota- tional coherence of interacting polar molecules in a spin- decoupled magic trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 253401 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, J.-R. Li, C. Miller, A. N. Car- roll, T. Bilitewski, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Reactions be- tween layer-resolved molecules mediated by dipolar spin exchange, Science375, 1299 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Q. Guan, S. L. Cornish, and S. Kotochigova, Magic con- ditions for multiple rotational states of bialkali molecules in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A103, 043311 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    P. D. Gregory, L. M. Fernley, A. L. Tao, S. L. Bromley, J. Stepp, Z. Zhang, S. Kotochigova, K. R. A. Hazzard, and S. L. Cornish, Second-scale rotational coherence and dipolar interactions in a gas of ultracold polar molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 415 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Demkowicz-Dobrzański, W

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, W. Górecki, and M. Guţă, Multi-parameter estimation beyond quantum Fisher in- formation, J. Phys. A53, 363001 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estima- tion, J. Phys. A53, 023001 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    P. D. Gregory, J. A. Blackmore, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hut- son, and S. L. Cornish, ac Stark effect in ultracold polar 87Rb133Cs molecules, Phys. Rev. A96, 021402 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, T. R. Hepworth, and S. L. Cornish, Enhanced quantum control of individual ultra- cold molecules using optical tweezer arrays, PRX Quan- tum 5, 020333 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    A. Das, A. L. Tao, L. M. Fernley, F. von Gierke, P. D. Gregory, S. L. Cornish, J. Hutson, R. Vexiau, and O. Dulieu, High-resolution spectroscopy of the low- est vibrational levels of the b3Π0 potential of 87Rb133Cs molecules (in preparation)

  29. [37]

    Albarelli, M

    F. Albarelli, M. Barbieri, M. Genoni, and I. Gianani, A perspective on multiparameter quantum metrology: From theoretical tools to applications in quantum imag- ing, Phys. Lett. A384, 126311 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    B. Dive, N. Koukoulekidis, S. Mousafeiris, and F. Mintert, Characterization of multilevel quantum co- herence without ideal measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013220 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Corfield, J

    O. Corfield, J. Lishman, C. Lee, J. M. Toba, G. Porter, J. M. Heinrich, S. C. Webster, F. Mintert, and R. C. Thompson, Certifying multilevel coherence in the mo- tional state of a trapped ion, PRX Quantum2, 040359 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Pezzè and A

    L. Pezzè and A. Smerzi, Advances in multiparameter quantum sensing and metrology, arXiv 2502, 17396 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    J.YeandP.Zoller,Essay: Quantumsensingwithatomic, molecular, andopticalplatformsforfundamentalphysics, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 190001 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Szczykulska, T

    M. Szczykulska, T. Baumgratz, and A. D. and, Multi- parameter quantum metrology, Advances in Physics: X 1, 621 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Gassab and Ö

    L. Gassab and Ö. E. Müstecaplıoğlu, Spin squeezing en- hanced quantum magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy center qutrits, arXiv2406, 15324 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    A. R. Shlyakhov, V. V. Zemlyanov, M. V. Suslov, A. V. Lebedev, G. S. Paraoanu, G. B. Lesovik, and G. Blatter, Quantum metrology with a transmon qutrit, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022115 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Preuschoff, M

    T. Preuschoff, M. Schlosser, and G. Birkl, Digital laser frequency and intensity stabilization based on the stem- lab platform (originally red pitaya), Review of Scientific Instruments 91, 083001 (2020). 12

    2020

  38. [46]

    A. N. Ciavarella and C. W. Bauer, Quantum simulation of SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory at leading order in large-Nc expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 111901 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Wellnitz, G

    D. Wellnitz, G. A. Domínguez-Castro, T. Bilitewski, M. Aidelsburger, A. M. Rey, and L. Santos, Emergent interaction-induced topology in bose-hubbard ladders, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012012 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Homeier, T

    L. Homeier, T. J. Harris, T. Blatz, S. Geier, S. Hollerith, U. Schollwöck, F. Grusdt, and A. Bohrdt, Antiferromag- netic bosonic t−J models and their quantum simulation in tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 230401 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    T. Roy, Z. Li, E. Kapit, and D. Schuster, Two-qutrit quantumalgorithmsonaprogrammablesuperconducting processor, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 064024 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    K. Wang, C. P. Williams, L. R. B. Picard, N. Y. Yao, andK.-K.Ni,Enrichingthequantumtoolboxofultracold molecules with Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030339 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. R. Tarbutt, Quantum computation in a hybrid array of molecules and Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030340 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Guttridge, D

    A. Guttridge, D. K. Ruttley, A. C. Baldock, R. González- Férez, H. R. Sadeghpour, C. S. Adams, and S. L. Cor- nish, Observation of Rydberg blockade due to the charge- dipole interaction between an atom and a polar molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 013401 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    R. V. Brooks, S. Spence, A. Guttridge, A. Alampounti, A. Rakonjac, L. A. McArd, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cor- nish, Preparation of one 87Rb and one 133Cs atom in a single optical tweezer, New J. Phys.23, 065002 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Spence, R

    S. Spence, R. V. Brooks, D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Preparation of87Rb and 133Cs in the motional ground state of a single optical tweezer, New J. Phys. 24, 103022 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, S. Spence, R. C. Bird, C. R. Le Sueur, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Formation of ultracold molecules by merging optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 223401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Jeffreys, An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems, Proc

    H. Jeffreys, An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A186, 453 (1946)

    1946

  49. [57]

    L. D. Brown, T. T. Cai, and A. DasGupta, Interval es- timation for a binomial proportion, Stat. Sci. 16, 101 (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    T. T. Cai, One-sided confidence intervals in discrete dis- tributions, J. Stat. Plan. Inference131, 63 (2005)

    2005

  51. [59]

    Ammenwerth, H

    M. Ammenwerth, H. Timme, F. Gyger, R. Tao, I. Bloch, andJ.Zeiher,Realizationofafasttriple-magicall-optical qutrit in strontium-88, arXiv2411, 02869 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Buchner, Nested sampling methods, Stat

    J. Buchner, Nested sampling methods, Stat. Surv.17, 169 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Buchner, UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine, J

    J. Buchner, UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine, J. Open Source Softw.6, 3001 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Valeri, V

    M. Valeri, V. Cimini, S. Piacentini, F. Ceccarelli, E. Polino, F. Hoch, G. Bizzarri, G. Corrielli, N. Spag- nolo, R. Osellame, and F. Sciarrino, Experimental multi- parameter quantum metrology in adaptive regime, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013138 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    S. Kuhr, W. Alt, D. Schrader, I. Dotsenko, Y. Mirosh- nychenko, W. Rosenfeld, M. Khudaverdyan, V. Gomer, A. Rauschenbeutel, and D. Meschede, Coherence proper- ties and quantum state transportation in an optical con- veyor belt, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 213002 (2003)

    2003

  56. [64]

    Aldegunde, B

    J. Aldegunde, B. A. Rivington, P. S. Żuchowski, and J. M. Hutson, Hyperfine energy levels of alkali-metal dimers: Ground-state polar molecules in electric and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A78, 033434 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    Barakhshan, A

    P. Barakhshan, A. Marrs, A. Bhosale, B. Arora, R. Eigenmann, and M. S. Safronova, Portal for high- precision atomic data and computation (version 2.0), [Online] (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    T. A. Savard, K. M. O’Hara, and J. E. Thomas, Laser- noise-induced heating in far-off resonance optical traps, Phys. Rev. A56, R1095 (1997)

    1997

  59. [67]

    Sawant, J

    P.D.Gregory, M.D.Frye, J.A.Blackmore, E.M.Bridge, R. Sawant, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Sticky col- lisions of ultracold RbCs molecules, Nat. Commun.10, 3104 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Diatomic-py: A Python module for calculating the rotational and hyperfine structure of1Σ molecules, Comput. Phys. Commun.282, 108512 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    P. D. Gregory, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Controlling the rotational and hyperfine state of ultracold 87Rb133Cs molecules, Phys. Rev. A 94, 041403(R) (2016). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Arpita Das, Albert Li Tao, and Luke M. Fernley for sharing their spectrosc...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.