Statistical analysis of multivariate planar curves and applications to X-ray classification

C\'edric Beaulac; Issam-Ali Moindji\'e; Marie-H\'el\`ene Descary

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Statistical analysis of multivariate planar curves and applications to X-ray classification

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that segmented images can be classified by analyzing the contours they contain together, as multivariate planar curves, and by using a joint alignment step that produces shape variables suited to functional classificatio

desk verdict Abstract describes a plausible shape-analysis method, but the full text is an unrelated quantum-physics paper, leaving every substantive claim unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11780 v2 pith:GEQ4Z5QJ submitted 2025-08-15 stat.ME cs.CVstat.ML

Issam-Ali Moindjié , Marie-Hélène Descary , Cédric Beaulac This is my paper

classification stat.MEcs.CVstat.ML MSC 62R1062H35

keywords multivariateplanarcurvesstatisticalshapeanalysiscurvealignmenttangentprojectionsfunctionalclassificationcardiomegalydetectionsegmentedX-rayimagesvariables

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that the shape of objects in segmented images can be used as a statistical predictor by analyzing their contours jointly rather than one at a time. It introduces multivariate planar curves, a formal extension of single-curve shape analysis to several curves, and proposes a joint alignment method that removes nuisance differences while keeping classification-relevant shape variation. The aligned shapes are mapped into the tangent space of the shape space and fed into functional classifiers. The authors report that this shape-only approach detects cardiomegaly in segmented chest X-rays and behaves robustly on synthetic data.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multivariate planar curve: a random element consisting of several planar contours viewed together. The load-bearing step is a joint alignment criterion that simultaneously registers all curves so that the resulting multivariate shape variables are compatible across images. These variables are then projected to the tangent space of the shape space, making them usable as functional predictors. The alignment step is what makes the formalism more than a collection of separate single-curve analyses.

What would settle it

Add controlled noise to the contours of the segmented X-rays and measure classification accuracy; if small perturbations erase the cardiomegaly signal, the claimed robustness fails. Alternatively, compute the joint-alignment objective for two curves and test for multiple distinct minimizers—non-unique optima would mean the alignment step is not well posed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the alignment problem in statistical shape analysis—how to register multiple planar curves across images, removing translation, rotation, and scaling—can be solved jointly in a way that preserves the differences that matter for classification. Solving it yields multivariate shape variables that live in a linearized tangent space, so standard functional classification methods can be applied directly to shape information. The paper's demonstration is cardiomegaly detection: from segmented chest X-rays, the aligned shape variables distinguish enlarged hearts, and synthetic experiments provide evidence for the stability of the procedure.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pipeline assumes the segmented contours are correct and that the joint alignment has a unique optimum that preserves the shape differences used for classification; if segmentation is noisy or the alignment objective has near-degenerate solutions, the shape variables lose their classification value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the formalism holds, pixel intensities are not needed for classification: the contour geometry alone carries the signal.
The joint alignment gives a principled way to compare the shapes of groups of objects within an image, allowing multiple organs or components to be treated as one statistical unit.
Tangent-projected shape variables can be plugged into off-the-shelf functional classifiers, bridging shape analysis and supervised learning.
A practical diagnostic—cardiomegaly—is claimed to be detectable from segmented X-rays using shape information only.
Synthetic experiments are claimed to show that the alignment remains stable under variation, which is a prerequisite for use beyond the specific dataset.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same aligned-shape representation could be extended to regression or to tracking shape evolution over time, since the projected variables are continuous and lie in a linear space.
The practical ceiling is set by segmentation quality: the method inherits every error in contour extraction, so its real-world accuracy depends on the segmenter as much as on the alignment.
The full text supplied for this abstract describes a different manuscript (on ultracold-molecule quantum control), so the cardiomegaly and synthetic-data results are not documented in the material provided; they are claims of the abstract alone.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things you should know. First, the abstract is about multivariate planar curves and X-ray classification. Second, the full text attached is arXiv:2508.11785v1, 'Control of Dipolar Dynamics by Geometrical Programming', a quantum-optics paper on molecular tweezer arrays. There is no overlap. No multivariate curves, no alignment, no tangent projections, no X-rays. So as an artifact for review, this submission contains only an abstract and an unrelated text. That is not a minor formatting issue; it means every substantive claim in the abstract—the new formalism, the solution to the alignment problem, the classification experiments—has no support in the submitted manuscript.

What the abstract itself offers is genuinely interesting as a direction. Statistical shape analysis has largely worked on single curves; extending it to multiple planar curves jointly, and treating the joint alignment as part of the model, is a sensible problem. The application to cardiomegaly detection from segmented X-rays is concrete and clinically meaningful. If the accompanying derivations and experiments are as clean as the abstract hints, it could be a useful contribution. I want to give credit where it's due: the prose is clear, the motivation is real, and the authors are not overselling—they say 'demonstrate appeal and robustness,' which is modest.

The soft spot is load-bearing and it is the entire body of the paper. There is no derivation of the alignment objective, no statement of the tangent projection, no synthetic experiments, no data description, and no accuracy numbers beyond the abstract's claim. The reader's concern about segmentation noise and near-degenerate alignment optima is reasonable, but we cannot even check whether the authors address it because the relevant sections do not exist in this artifact. This is not a 'maybe the math is wrong' situation; it is a 'no math is present' situation.

So: who is this for? As submitted, nobody. The abstract alone is not enough to judge novelty or soundness, and the unrelated text adds nothing. If a matching full text appears, it should get a proper reading.

Recommendation: desk reject, direct the authors to resubmit with the correct manuscript. I would not send this artifact to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as received, consists of an abstract announcing a new statistical formalism for multivariate planar curves and its application to X-ray classification, followed by a full text that is entirely unrelated: 'Control of Dipolar Dynamics by Geometrical Programming' (You et al., arXiv:2508.11785v1), a quantum-physics paper on molecular tweezer arrays. None of the claimed content—the definition of multivariate planar curves, the alignment objective, tangent projections, functional classification, synthetic experiments, or the cardiomegaly study—appears anywhere in the full text. The internal mathematical development (Eqs. (1)-(9), Figs. 1-4, Supplementary Material) concerns dipolar interactions, thermal dephasing, and spin squeezing. Consequently, the abstract's central claims cannot be checked for correctness, consistency, or reproducibility. The submission is not merely missing a minor section; it lacks the entire supporting document for the research described in the abstract.

Significance. If the proposed formalism existed and performed as claimed, the contribution could be relevant to statistical shape analysis and medical image classification by offering a multivariate extension of functional data analysis on contours. However, significance cannot be assessed because no derivations, algorithmic definitions, or experimental results are supplied. The paper as submitted contributes no verifiable content beyond the abstract's claims. No code, proofs, or data are provided. Thus the potential significance is entirely conditional on content that is absent.

major comments (3)

[Full text (all sections)] The submitted full text is a quantum-physics paper, 'Control of Dipolar Dynamics by Geometrical Programming' (You et al.), not a statistics manuscript. It contains no multivariate planar curves, no alignment objective, no tangent projection, no functional classification, and no X-ray data. For example, Eq. (1) describes a dipolar interaction strength, and Figs. 1-4 show molecular array geometries and spin squeezing. This is a load-bearing missing-support issue: the central claims in the abstract are entirely unsupported by the document under review.
[Abstract, cardiomegaly claim] The abstract states that 'Detection of cardiomegaly in segmented X-rays and numerical experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the appeal and robustness of the proposed method.' The full text contains no such experiments, no dataset description, no segmentation procedure, no evaluation metric, and no accuracy results. The claimed empirical validation is absent, so the abstract's assertion of 'appeal and robustness' cannot be verified.
[Abstract, alignment solution] The abstract claims 'we propose a solution to the alignment issue in statistical shape analysis.' The supplied text gives no definition of the multivariate shape variables, no optimization problem for alignment, no existence/uniqueness statement, and no tangent-space construction. This omission is not a presentation detail; it removes the methodological core from the submission.

minor comments (2)

[Title/metadata] The arXiv identifier in the reviewer materials (2508.11780) does not match the arXiv identifier on the supplied full text (2508.11785v1). The editor should verify that the correct file was uploaded.
[References] The reference list is entirely quantum-physics literature and contains no citations to statistical shape analysis (e.g., Kendall, Dryden and Mardia, or functional data analysis). This is consistent with the full text being a different paper, but it also means the abstract's framing has no bibliographic support in the submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified; supplied full text is a different paper, so the abstract's derivation chain is unsupported rather than circular.

full rationale

The supplied full text (arXiv:2508.11785v1, 'Control of Dipolar Dynamics by Geometrical Programming') is a quantum-physics Letter on molecular tweezer arrays and contains none of the abstract's claimed content: no multivariate planar curve formalism, no alignment objective in statistical shape analysis, no tangent projections, no functional classification, no segmented X-ray or synthetic shape experiments. There is therefore no derivation chain present to audit, and no equation or fitted parameter can be exhibited as equivalent to its own inputs by construction. The mismatch is a missing-support / verifiability problem, not a circularity problem: per the hard rules, absence of evidence for the central claim does not by itself establish that the claim is circular. The reader's robustness concern about segmentation noise or non-unique alignment also cannot be evaluated because the relevant sections are absent. Since no circular step can be quoted, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The abstract names no fitted quantities, so no free parameters can be enumerated at this level of evidence. A full audit would need the alignment objective (typically an optimization over reparameterization and rotation parameters), the tangent-space projection details, and the classifier hyperparameters, none of which are available in the abstract. The absence is a limitation of the evidence, not evidence of a clean ledger.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Shape of a planar curve is invariant under reparameterization and rigid motion, so classification features can be built from equivalence classes of curves.
Implied by the abstract's reference to the alignment issue in statistical shape analysis; the whole method assumes the meaningful information is shape, not parametrization or pose.
domain assumption The space of multivariate curve shapes is a manifold with a tangent structure on which standard classifiers can operate.
The abstract states classification is done through tangent projections; that requires the shape space to admit a well-defined tangent-space approximation for the multivariate object, which is a nontrivial geometric assumption.
domain assumption Contours segmented from radiographs faithfully represent the anatomy relevant to the diagnosis.
The abstract uses segmented images (through the associated contours they highlight) as predictors; if segmentation is systematically biased, the classification result does not generalize to clinical use.

invented entities (1)

Multivariate planar curve (the joint formal object over multiple contours)
purpose: Represents several contour curves of one image jointly so their shapes can be analyzed and aligned simultaneously instead of one curve at a time.
This is the abstract's claimed new formalism. It is a mathematical representational device, not a physical entity. Its only support is internal consistency plus the paper's own reported experiments, so it carries no falsifiable handle outside this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Statistical analysis of multivariate planar curves and applications to X-ray classification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GEQ4Z5QJ

@misc{pith2026250811780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Statistical analysis of multivariate planar curves and applications to X-ray classification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GEQ4Z5QJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11780}
}

read the original abstract

Recent developments in computer vision have enabled the availability of segmented images across various domains, such as medicine, where segmented radiography images play an important role in diagnosis-making. As prediction problems are common in medical image analysis, this work explores the use of segmented images (through the associated contours they highlight) as predictors in a supervised classification context. Consequently, we develop a new approach for image analysis that takes into account the shape of objects within images. For this aim, we introduce a new formalism that extends the study of single random planar curves to the joint analysis of multiple planar curves-referred to here as multivariate planar curves. In this framework, we propose a solution to the alignment issue in statistical shape analysis. The obtained multivariate shape variables are then used in functional classification methods through tangent projections. Detection of cardiomegaly in segmented X-rays and numerical experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the appeal and robustness of the proposed method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Functional Data Framework For Analyzing Shapes and Textures in Images
stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Proposes a frugal functional representation for star-shaped image objects to analyze contours and textures, illustrated on supervised classification.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Burchesky, L

S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Physical Review Letters �� , 123202 (2021)

work page 2021
[2]

A. J. Park, L. R. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, J. T. Zhang, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Physical Review Letters �� , 183401 (2023)

work page 2023
[3]

P. D. Gregory, L. M. Fernley, A. L. Tao, S. L. Bromley, J. Stepp, Z. Zhang, S. Kotochigova, K. R. Hazzard, and S. L. Cornish, Nature Physics �� , 415 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature �� , 821 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

T. R. Hepworth, D. K. Ruttley, F. von Gierke, P. D. Gregory, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15088 (2024)

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[8]

Anderegg, L

L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science �� , 1156 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Nature �� , 282 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

J. W. Park, Z. Z. Yan, H. Loh, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Science �� , 372 (2017)

work page 2017

Show all 51 references

[12]

Silveri, J

M. Silveri, J. Tuorila, E. Thuneberg, and G. Paraoanu, Reports on Progress in Physics �� , 056002 (2017)

2017
[13]

J. A. Blackmore, R. Sawant, P. D. Gregory, S. L. Brom- ley, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Physical Review A �� , 053316 (2020)

2020
[14]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. De L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science �� , 1021 (2016)

2016
[15]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Science �� , 1024 (2016)

2016
[16]

Bluvstein, H

D. Bluvstein, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, M. Kalinowski, A. Keesling, N. Maskara, H. Pichler, M. Greiner, et al., Nature �� , 451 (2022)

2022
[17]

Deist, J

E. Deist, J. A. Gerber, Y.-H. Lu, J. Zeiher, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Physical Review Letters �� , 083201 (2022)

2022
[18]

E. J. Davis, B. Ye, F. Machado, S. A. Meynell, W. Wu, T. Mittiga, W. Schenken, M. Joos, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, et al., Nature physics �� , 836 (2023)

2023
[19]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Nature Physics �� , 132 (2020)

2020
[20]

Bornet, G

G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mez- zacapo, et al., Nature �� , 728 (2023)

2023
[21]

L. Su, A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. H´ ebert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson, et al., Nature �� , 724 (2023)

2023
[22]

Raeisi, N

S. Raeisi, N. Wiebe, and B. C. Sanders, New Journal of Physics �� , 103017 (2012)

2012
[23]

Bluvstein, S

D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kalinowski, D. Hangleiter, et al., Nature �� , 58 (2024)

2024
[25]

Bergonzoni, S

M. Bergonzoni, S. Jandura, and G. Pupillo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21238 (2025)

2025
[26]

Anderegg, B

L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, L. W. Cheuk, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Nature Physics �� , 890 (2018). 6

2018
[27]

L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Physical review letters �� , 083201 (2018)

2018
[28]

Y. Lu, S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, and L. W. Cheuk, Nature Physics �� , 389 (2024)

2024
[29]

Caldwell and M

L. Caldwell and M. Tarbutt, Physical Review Research �, 013251 (2020)

2020
[30]

Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, J. You, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ket- terle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Physical Review X �� , 031002 (2024)

2024
[31]

See Supplemental Material for additional details
[32]

Emperauger, M

G. Emperauger, M. Qiao, G. Bornet, C. Chen, R. Martin, Y. T. Chew, B. G´ ely, L. Klein, D. Barredo, A. Browaeys, et al., Physical Review A �� , 062806 (2025)

2025
[33]

M. A. Perlin, C. Qu, and A. M. Rey, Physical Review Letters �� , 223401 (2020)

2020
[34]

W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Nature �� , 734 (2023)

2023
[35]

J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, G. L. Moreau, M. D. Wahrman, N. A. Lewis, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Schleier- Smith, Physical Review Letters �� , 063401 (2023)

2023
[37]

Douglas, V

A. Douglas, V. Kaxiras, L. Su, M. Szurek, V. Singh, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07219 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[38]

D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Physical Review A �� , 67 (1994)

1994
[39]

Wellnitz, M

D. Wellnitz, M. Mamaev, T. Bilitewski, and A. M. Rey, Physical Review Research �, L012025 (2024)

2024
[40]

Schachenmayer, A

J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Physical Review X �, 011022 (2015)

2015
[41]

Borish, O

V. Borish, O. Markovi´ c, J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, and M. Schleier-Smith, Physical review letters �� , 063601 (2020)

2020
[42]

Schine, A

N. Schine, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, M. J. Martin, and A. M. Kaufman, Nature Physics �� , 1067 (2022)

2022
[43]

S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, Nature �� , 279 (2023)

2023
[44]

Scholl, A

P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi, and M. Endres, Nature �� , 273 (2023). 7 Supplementary Material In this supplementary material, we discuss the mathematical modeling used to calculate thermally induced dephas- ing at different temperatures and an...

2023
[45]

K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Chemical science �, 6830 (2018)

2018
[46]

Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science �� , 1138 (2023)

2023
[47]

C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, Science �� , 1143 (2023)

2023
[48]

L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature �� , 821 (2025)

2025
[49]

D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Nature , 1 (2025)

2025
[50]

B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Nature �� , 521 (2013)

2013
[51]

Christakis, J

L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morningstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Nature �� , 64 (2023)

2023
[52]

S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, et al., Nature �� , 268 (2023)

2023
[53]

Block, B

M. Block, B. Ye, B. Roberts, S. Chern, W. Wu, Z. Wang, L. Pollet, E. J. Davis, B. I. Halperin, and N. Y. Yao, Nature Physics �� , 1575 (2024)

2024
[54]

Bentsen, T

G. Bentsen, T. Hashizume, A. S. Buyskikh, E. J. Davis, A. J. Daley, S. S. Gubser, and M. Schleier-Smith, Physical review letters �� , 130601 (2019)

2019
[55]

Hashizume, G

T. Hashizume, G. S. Bentsen, S. Weber, and A. J. Daley, Physical Review Letters �� , 200603 (2021)

2021
[56]

Lin, H.-S

R. Lin, H.-S. Zhong, Y. Li, Z.-R. Zhao, L.-T. Zheng, T.-R. Hu, H.-M. Wu, Z. Wu, W.-J. Ma, Y. Gao, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14647 (2024)

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Burchesky, L

S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Physical Review Letters �� , 123202 (2021)

work page 2021

[2] [2]

A. J. Park, L. R. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, J. T. Zhang, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Physical Review Letters �� , 183401 (2023)

work page 2023

[3] [3]

P. D. Gregory, L. M. Fernley, A. L. Tao, S. L. Bromley, J. Stepp, Z. Zhang, S. Kotochigova, K. R. Hazzard, and S. L. Cornish, Nature Physics �� , 415 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [6]

L. R. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Nature �� , 821 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [7]

T. R. Hepworth, D. K. Ruttley, F. von Gierke, P. D. Gregory, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15088 (2024)

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[6] [8]

Anderegg, L

L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science �� , 1156 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [9]

N. B. Vilas, P. Robichaud, C. Hallas, G. K. Li, L. An- deregg, and J. M. Doyle, Nature �� , 282 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [10]

J. W. Park, Z. Z. Yan, H. Loh, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Science �� , 372 (2017)

work page 2017